Support needs of gout patients and suitability of eHealth to address these needs.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae125
Jeffrey van der Ven, Bart J F van den Bemt, Floor Ariaans, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Marcel Flendrie, Lise M Verhoef
{"title":"Support needs of gout patients and suitability of eHealth to address these needs.","authors":"Jeffrey van der Ven, Bart J F van den Bemt, Floor Ariaans, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Marcel Flendrie, Lise M Verhoef","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the support needs of patients with gout regarding information, communication, treatment and disease monitoring, and patients' views on and preferences for eHealth applications to address these needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focus group study using purposive sampling was conducted. Three focus group sessions with a duration of 2 h per group were held with in total of 23 patients using urate-lowering therapy, recruited from primary and secondary care. Audio recordings were transcribed, and data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight themes were identified. Five themes addressed support needs of gout patients and suitability of eHealth in addressing those needs: (1) Timely access to healthcare, especially during flares; (2) (personalized) information regarding diagnosis, medication, and diet; (3) insight into uric acid levels and medication side effects through blood monitoring; (4) better coordination across primary and secondary care; and (5) self-management and shared responsibility over care for maintaining health. Three themes addressed eHealth in general: (1) receptive towards eHealth in gout care; (2) the preference for eHealth to have a complementary role (i.e. not replacing face-to-face) contact with healthcare providers; and (3) preferences on eHealth use and functionalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients expressed various needs regarding their disease management and projected a supporting role for eHealth in (self)management of gout. Addressing the needs and preferences of patients could enhance their understanding of the disease and treatment, self-management, and possibly health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"rkae125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the support needs of patients with gout regarding information, communication, treatment and disease monitoring, and patients' views on and preferences for eHealth applications to address these needs.

Methods: A focus group study using purposive sampling was conducted. Three focus group sessions with a duration of 2 h per group were held with in total of 23 patients using urate-lowering therapy, recruited from primary and secondary care. Audio recordings were transcribed, and data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Eight themes were identified. Five themes addressed support needs of gout patients and suitability of eHealth in addressing those needs: (1) Timely access to healthcare, especially during flares; (2) (personalized) information regarding diagnosis, medication, and diet; (3) insight into uric acid levels and medication side effects through blood monitoring; (4) better coordination across primary and secondary care; and (5) self-management and shared responsibility over care for maintaining health. Three themes addressed eHealth in general: (1) receptive towards eHealth in gout care; (2) the preference for eHealth to have a complementary role (i.e. not replacing face-to-face) contact with healthcare providers; and (3) preferences on eHealth use and functionalities.

Conclusion: Patients expressed various needs regarding their disease management and projected a supporting role for eHealth in (self)management of gout. Addressing the needs and preferences of patients could enhance their understanding of the disease and treatment, self-management, and possibly health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痛风患者的支持需求以及电子医疗满足这些需求的适宜性。
目的调查痛风患者在信息、交流、治疗和疾病监测方面的支持需求,以及患者对满足这些需求的电子健康应用程序的看法和偏好:方法:采用目的取样法进行了一次焦点小组研究。从初级和二级医疗机构共招募了 23 名接受降尿酸治疗的患者参加了三次焦点小组会议,每组会议持续 2 小时。对录音进行了转录,并采用主题分析法对数据进行了分析:结果:共确定了八个主题。五个主题涉及痛风患者的支持需求以及电子医疗在满足这些需求方面的适用性:(1) 及时获得医疗服务,尤其是在病情发作时;(2) 有关诊断、药物和饮食的(个性化)信息;(3) 通过血液监测了解尿酸水平和药物副作用;(4) 在初级和二级医疗机构之间更好地协调;(5) 自我管理和共同承担维护健康的责任。有三个主题涉及电子健康:(1)痛风护理中对电子健康的接受程度;(2)希望电子健康发挥补充作用(即不取代与医疗服务提供者的面对面接触);以及(3)对电子健康的使用和功能的偏好:结论:患者表达了他们在疾病管理方面的各种需求,并预测了电子健康在痛风(自我)管理中的辅助作用。满足患者的需求和偏好可以增强他们对疾病和治疗的理解,促进自我管理,并可能改善健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Axial spondyloarthritis treatment patterns, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome collection in US rheumatology practices. Patterns of steroid use in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis commencing treatment with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs. Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients demonstrate comparable rates of major adverse cardiovascular events: a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Gout, TikTok and misleading information: a content analysis. Cardiovascular risk and lipid-lowering therapy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a call for improved, disease-specific risk assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1