Erector Spinae Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Patient-controlled Analgesia Needed.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Pub Date : 2025-02-15 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005185
Ernest Y Young, David Gurd, Thomas Kuivila, John Seif, Leah Bess, Ryan Goodwin
{"title":"Erector Spinae Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: No Patient-controlled Analgesia Needed.","authors":"Ernest Y Young, David Gurd, Thomas Kuivila, John Seif, Leah Bess, Ryan Goodwin","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective controlled cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on patients with postoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with and without patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain control after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for AIS includes opioids and other modalities. The goal of these modalities is to reduce pain and opioid consumption. Two new modalities for pain control include LB and ESPB. There are scant studies on these modalities tested in concert on patients undergoing PSF for AIS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Seventy-two consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF were separated into patients who had a PCA (group A) as part of their postoperative pain management and those who did not (group B). Opioid consumption was measured through morphine milligram equivalents. Pain scores were measured through the visual acuity score (Visual Analog Scale). Patient mobility was measured by steps taken. These were measured by the function of postoperative days from surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group B had significantly lower morphine milligram equivalents at every point after surgery, most notably throughout the entire hospital stay (99.8 vs . 200.7). Postoperative pain scores in group B were the same if not better than group A. There was no difference in mobility between the cohorts. Group B had lower LOS (3.7 vs . 4.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In postoperative PSF for patients with AIS receiving LB through ESPB, those who did not receive a PCA had lower opioid consumption without worse pain scores or mobility and had a lower LOS. Adding LB through ESPB to postoperative pain regimens effectively replaces a PCA by providing the same pain control and reducing overall opioid consumption and LOS.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"266-270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective controlled cohort.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine (LB) through erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on patients with postoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with and without patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).

Background: Pain control after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for AIS includes opioids and other modalities. The goal of these modalities is to reduce pain and opioid consumption. Two new modalities for pain control include LB and ESPB. There are scant studies on these modalities tested in concert on patients undergoing PSF for AIS.

Patients and methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients with AIS who underwent PSF were separated into patients who had a PCA (group A) as part of their postoperative pain management and those who did not (group B). Opioid consumption was measured through morphine milligram equivalents. Pain scores were measured through the visual acuity score (Visual Analog Scale). Patient mobility was measured by steps taken. These were measured by the function of postoperative days from surgery.

Results: Group B had significantly lower morphine milligram equivalents at every point after surgery, most notably throughout the entire hospital stay (99.8 vs . 200.7). Postoperative pain scores in group B were the same if not better than group A. There was no difference in mobility between the cohorts. Group B had lower LOS (3.7 vs . 4.1).

Conclusion: In postoperative PSF for patients with AIS receiving LB through ESPB, those who did not receive a PCA had lower opioid consumption without worse pain scores or mobility and had a lower LOS. Adding LB through ESPB to postoperative pain regimens effectively replaces a PCA by providing the same pain control and reducing overall opioid consumption and LOS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸手术中使用脂质体布比卡因进行脊柱侧凸平面阻滞:无需患者自控镇痛。
研究设计回顾性对照队列:评估术中通过脊柱前凸平面阻滞(ESPB)使用脂质体布比卡因(LB)对青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者术后使用和不使用患者自控镇痛(PCA)的效果:背景数据摘要:特发性脊柱侧弯症(AIS)后路脊柱融合术(PSF)后的疼痛控制包括阿片类药物和其他方式。这些方法的目的是减少疼痛和阿片类药物的用量。两种新的疼痛控制方式包括 LB 和 ESPB。方法:72 名连续接受 PSF 的 AIS 患者被分为两组,作为术后疼痛治疗的一部分,接受 PCA 的患者(A 组)和未接受 PCA 的患者(B 组)。阿片类药物的消耗量通过吗啡毫克当量(MME)进行测量。疼痛评分通过视觉敏锐度评分(VAS)进行测量。患者的活动能力通过步数来衡量。这些都是通过术后天数(POD)来衡量的:结果:B 组患者术后各阶段的 MME 均明显较低,尤其是在整个住院期间(99.8 对 200.7)。B 组的术后疼痛评分与 A 组相同,甚至更好。B组的住院时间较短(3.7 对 4.1):在通过ESPB接受LB治疗的AIS患者术后PSF中,未接受PCA治疗的患者阿片类药物用量较低,但疼痛评分或活动能力并没有变差,而且LOS较低。在术后止痛方案中加入通过ESPB进行的LB治疗可有效替代PCA,提供相同的疼痛控制,减少阿片类药物的总用量和LOS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Scoliosis: A Mid-Term Cohort Study. Assessing the Impact of Preoperative MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Scores on Five-Year Prognosis in Lumbar Spine Surgery. Return to Work After Surgery for Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Nationwide Registry-based Study. Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding: Intraoperative Hypotension is an Important Modifiable Risk Factor for Major Complications in Spinal Fusion Surgery. Reply to Concerning the Article: Feasibility of C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation With the "in-out-in" Technique for Patients With Basilar Invagination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1