[Collaboration with patients' family members and representatives: legal perspective and barriers in clinical practice].

Q4 Medicine Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-01-01
A Vellinga, E Landeweer, C Blankman
{"title":"[Collaboration with patients' family members and representatives: legal perspective and barriers in clinical practice].","authors":"A Vellinga, E Landeweer, C Blankman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act (Wvggz) family members and representatives have a more central position. However, in clinical practice there is a lack of collaboration.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Giving an overview of the relevant legal texts and analyzing possible reasons for the lack of collaboration.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Discussion of relevant legal texts and publications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aim of the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act is to enhance the patients&rsquo; rights and rights of their family. In clinical practice it is difficult to find a good collaboration. One problem is that patients&rsquo; competence may fluctuate over time. And also confidentiality is seen as an important barrier. Family members also experience tension by fulfilling different roles, especially when they are representative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act gives a clear framework for collaboration with family members, the application is complex in clinical practice. The formal possibilities can only be applied, when relations with both patients and their family members are built in trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"66 8","pages":"432-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act (Wvggz) family members and representatives have a more central position. However, in clinical practice there is a lack of collaboration.

Aim: Giving an overview of the relevant legal texts and analyzing possible reasons for the lack of collaboration.

Method: Discussion of relevant legal texts and publications.

Results: The aim of the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act is to enhance the patients’ rights and rights of their family. In clinical practice it is difficult to find a good collaboration. One problem is that patients’ competence may fluctuate over time. And also confidentiality is seen as an important barrier. Family members also experience tension by fulfilling different roles, especially when they are representative.

Conclusion: Although the Compulsory Mental Health Care Act gives a clear framework for collaboration with family members, the application is complex in clinical practice. The formal possibilities can only be applied, when relations with both patients and their family members are built in trust.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[与患者家属和代表合作:法律视角与临床实践中的障碍]。
背景:在《强制精神健康护理法》(Wvggz)中,家庭成员和代表的地位更为重要。目的:概述相关法律条文,分析缺乏合作的可能原因:方法:讨论相关法律文本和出版物:强制精神健康护理法》的目的是加强患者及其家属的权利。在临床实践中,很难找到一种良好的合作方式。其中一个问题是患者的能力可能会随着时间的推移而发生变化。此外,保密也被视为一个重要障碍。家庭成员也会因为扮演不同的角色而感到紧张,尤其是当他们作为代表时:尽管《强制精神健康护理法》为与家庭成员的合作提供了一个清晰的框架,但在临床实践中的应用却很复杂。只有在与患者及其家属建立起相互信任的关系后,才有可能正式应用这些可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
[Compulsory care for a mental incompetent pregnant woman: a case-report]. [Erotomania as a symptom of pathological grief]. [The nurse practitioner as responsible clinician: opportunities and challenges]. [Underexposed consequences of assisted death on psychiatric grounds for mental health care]. [Verplichte zorg bij een wilsonbekwame zwangere: maatwerk met respect voor mensenrechten].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1