Shift from Widespread to Tailored Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Treated with CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy: Results from a Large Retrospective Cohort.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.10.010
Giovanna Melica, Alejandro Luna de Abia, Gunjan L Shah, Sean Devlin, Magdalena Corona, Joshua Fein, Parastoo B Dahi, Sergio A Giralt, Richard J Lin, M Lia Palomba, Allison Parascondola, Jae Park, Gilles Salles, Amethyst Saldia, Michael Scordo, Roni Shouval, Miguel-Angel Perales, Susan K Seo
{"title":"Shift from Widespread to Tailored Antifungal Prophylaxis in Lymphoma Patients Treated with CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy: Results from a Large Retrospective Cohort.","authors":"Giovanna Melica, Alejandro Luna de Abia, Gunjan L Shah, Sean Devlin, Magdalena Corona, Joshua Fein, Parastoo B Dahi, Sergio A Giralt, Richard J Lin, M Lia Palomba, Allison Parascondola, Jae Park, Gilles Salles, Amethyst Saldia, Michael Scordo, Roni Shouval, Miguel-Angel Perales, Susan K Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients undergoing CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy exhibit multiple immune deficits that may increase their susceptibility to infections. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are life-threatening events in the setting of hematologic diseases. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal role and duration of antifungal prophylaxis in this specific patient population. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of IFI prophylactic strategies over time and to assess IFI incidence rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma treated with CAR-T cell therapy. A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with R/R B cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between April 2016 and March 2023. Group A (April 2016-August 2020) consisted of patients primarily treated with fluconazole, irrespective of their individual IFI risk profile. In Group B (September 2020-March 2023) antifungal prophylaxis was recommended only for high-risk patients. Overall, 330 patients were included. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed to 119/142 (84%) patients in Group A and 58/188 (31%) in Group B (P < .001). Anti-mold azoles were prescribed to 8 (5.6%) patients in Group A and 21 (11.2%) patients in Group B. In Group A, 42 (29%) patients were switched to another antifungal, 9 (21%) because of toxicity, with 6 cases of transaminitis and 3 cases of prolonged QTc. In Group B, 21 (11.2%) patients were switched to the antifungal drug, mainly from fluconazole or micafungin to a mold-active agent following revised guidelines. No difference was found in liver toxicity between the two groups at infusion, day 10, and day 30. No significant differences were observed between the groups. IFIs following CAR-T cell therapy were rare, with 1 case of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in group A (.7%) and 1 case of invasive aspergillosis in Group B (.5%), both occurring in patients on micafungin prophylaxis. In this large single-center cohort of patients with R/R lymphoma treated with CAR-T cells, we show that individualized prophylaxis, alongside careful management of CAR-T cell-related toxicities such as CRS, was associated with a very low IFI rate, avoiding the risk of unnecessary toxicities, drug-drug interactions, and high costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtct.2024.10.010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients undergoing CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy exhibit multiple immune deficits that may increase their susceptibility to infections. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are life-threatening events in the setting of hematologic diseases. However, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal role and duration of antifungal prophylaxis in this specific patient population. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of IFI prophylactic strategies over time and to assess IFI incidence rates in a cohort of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphoma treated with CAR-T cell therapy. A single-center retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of patients with R/R B cell lymphoma treated with CD19 CAR-T cell therapy between April 2016 and March 2023. Group A (April 2016-August 2020) consisted of patients primarily treated with fluconazole, irrespective of their individual IFI risk profile. In Group B (September 2020-March 2023) antifungal prophylaxis was recommended only for high-risk patients. Overall, 330 patients were included. Antifungal prophylaxis was prescribed to 119/142 (84%) patients in Group A and 58/188 (31%) in Group B (P < .001). Anti-mold azoles were prescribed to 8 (5.6%) patients in Group A and 21 (11.2%) patients in Group B. In Group A, 42 (29%) patients were switched to another antifungal, 9 (21%) because of toxicity, with 6 cases of transaminitis and 3 cases of prolonged QTc. In Group B, 21 (11.2%) patients were switched to the antifungal drug, mainly from fluconazole or micafungin to a mold-active agent following revised guidelines. No difference was found in liver toxicity between the two groups at infusion, day 10, and day 30. No significant differences were observed between the groups. IFIs following CAR-T cell therapy were rare, with 1 case of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in group A (.7%) and 1 case of invasive aspergillosis in Group B (.5%), both occurring in patients on micafungin prophylaxis. In this large single-center cohort of patients with R/R lymphoma treated with CAR-T cells, we show that individualized prophylaxis, alongside careful management of CAR-T cell-related toxicities such as CRS, was associated with a very low IFI rate, avoiding the risk of unnecessary toxicities, drug-drug interactions, and high costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受 CD19 CAR T 细胞疗法的淋巴瘤患者的抗真菌预防从广泛应用转向量身定制:大型回顾性队列的结果。
背景:接受 CD19 嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T 细胞疗法的患者表现出多种免疫缺陷,这可能会增加他们对感染的易感性。侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是血液病中威胁生命的疾病。然而,关于抗真菌预防在这一特殊患者群体中的最佳作用和持续时间一直存在争议:本研究的目的是全面概述随着时间推移IFI预防策略的演变,并评估接受CAR-T细胞疗法治疗的复发或难治性(R/R)淋巴瘤患者队列中的IFI发生率:2016年4月至2023年3月期间接受CD19 CAR-T细胞疗法治疗的R/R B细胞淋巴瘤患者队列的单中心回顾性研究。A组(2016年4月至2020年8月)包括主要接受氟康唑治疗的患者,无论其个体IFI风险状况如何。B 组(2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月)仅建议高风险患者使用抗真菌预防:结果:共纳入 330 名患者。A组有119/142(84%)名患者接受了抗真菌预防治疗,B组有58/188(31%)名患者接受了抗真菌预防治疗:在这个大型单中心队列中,我们对接受CAR T细胞治疗的R/R淋巴瘤患者进行了研究,结果表明,在谨慎处理CAR T细胞相关毒性(如CRS)的同时,个体化预防与极低的IFI率相关,避免了不必要的毒性、药物间相互作用和高成本风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1061
审稿时长
51 days
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Risk Factors for Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome after Initial Detection of Pulmonary Impairment after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation' [Transplantation and Cellular Therapy 29/3 (2023) 204-204]. Early mixed donor chimerism is a strong negative prognostic indicator in allogeneic stem cell transplant for AML and MDS. Factors Associated with Increased Risk of Contamination in Bone Marrow Transplants. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Extracorporeal Photopheresis for the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Outpatient management of patients conditioned with Fludarabine and Treosulfan prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1