Milk production and viability of the various smallholder dairying models used in Zimbabwe.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Tropical animal health and production Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s11250-024-04191-9
Takudzwa Mafigu, Blessed Masunda, Venancio Edward Imbayarwo-Chikosi, David Tinotenda Mbiriri, Pride Hodzi
{"title":"Milk production and viability of the various smallholder dairying models used in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Takudzwa Mafigu, Blessed Masunda, Venancio Edward Imbayarwo-Chikosi, David Tinotenda Mbiriri, Pride Hodzi","doi":"10.1007/s11250-024-04191-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An evaluation of milk yield, dairy products and viability of the smallholder dairy production models used in Zimbabwe was carried out. We used secondary data on 1167 smallholder dairy farmers. These were categorised into commercial dairying (119), Milk collection centre (MCC) bulking and processing (145), MCC bulking and delivering to processor (87), farm gate (468) and other (348) models. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0. The average daily milk yield per cows was highest in the Commercial dairying model (9.20 ± 0.4 l) but was not significantly different from the MCC bulking and processing and MCC bulking and delivering to processor models. Average lactation milk yield per cow was highest (P < 0.05) in the commercial dairying model (2804.91 ± 133.9 l) and was significantly different from the rest of the models. The processed milk products identified in the study were fermented milk, pasteurised milk and unspecified products but production volumes were very low in the respective models. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in gross margin across all the smallholder dairying models. The commercial dairying model surpassed all models on proportion of pure exotic dairy breeds, number of milking cows, milk yield. However, it was discovered that all models were underperforming but smallholder dairy farmers can be recommended to adopt the commercial dairying model if measures to improve milk yield per cow and reduce milk production costs are established.</p>","PeriodicalId":23329,"journal":{"name":"Tropical animal health and production","volume":"56 8","pages":"353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical animal health and production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-024-04191-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An evaluation of milk yield, dairy products and viability of the smallholder dairy production models used in Zimbabwe was carried out. We used secondary data on 1167 smallholder dairy farmers. These were categorised into commercial dairying (119), Milk collection centre (MCC) bulking and processing (145), MCC bulking and delivering to processor (87), farm gate (468) and other (348) models. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0. The average daily milk yield per cows was highest in the Commercial dairying model (9.20 ± 0.4 l) but was not significantly different from the MCC bulking and processing and MCC bulking and delivering to processor models. Average lactation milk yield per cow was highest (P < 0.05) in the commercial dairying model (2804.91 ± 133.9 l) and was significantly different from the rest of the models. The processed milk products identified in the study were fermented milk, pasteurised milk and unspecified products but production volumes were very low in the respective models. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in gross margin across all the smallholder dairying models. The commercial dairying model surpassed all models on proportion of pure exotic dairy breeds, number of milking cows, milk yield. However, it was discovered that all models were underperforming but smallholder dairy farmers can be recommended to adopt the commercial dairying model if measures to improve milk yield per cow and reduce milk production costs are established.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
津巴布韦各种小农奶业模式的牛奶产量和可行性。
我们对产奶量、乳制品和津巴布韦小农奶业生产模式的可行性进行了评估。我们使用了 1167 个小农奶农的二手数据。这些数据被分为商业化奶业(119)、牛奶收集中心(MCC)散装和加工(145)、牛奶收集中心散装并交付给加工商(87)、农场门口(468)和其他(348)模式。数据使用 SPSS 25.0 版进行分析。每头奶牛的平均日产奶量在商业奶业模式中最高(9.20 ± 0.4 升),但与 MCC 散装加工模式和 MCC 散装并交付给加工商模式没有显著差异。在所有小农奶业模式中,每头奶牛的平均泌乳产奶量在毛利率方面最高(P 0.05)。商业奶业模式在纯种外来奶牛品种比例、挤奶奶牛数量和产奶量方面超过了所有模式。然而,研究发现,所有模式都表现不佳,但如果能采取措施提高每头奶牛的产奶量并降低牛奶生产成本,可以建议小农奶农采用商业化奶业模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical animal health and production
Tropical animal health and production 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tropical Animal Health and Production is an international journal publishing the results of original research in any field of animal health, welfare, and production with the aim of improving health and productivity of livestock, and better utilisation of animal resources, including wildlife in tropical, subtropical and similar agro-ecological environments.
期刊最新文献
Effect of supplementation of distillers' dried grain with solubles (DDGS) to a straw-based diet on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in Nellore ram lambs. Practices and efficacy of nematode control in sheep, goats and cattle in communal grazing settings of central Ethiopia. Assessment of feeding hydroponic fodder on growth and reproduction performance in Black Bengal goat. Effects of adding mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) as a replacement for fish meal to broiler chicken diet on performance, carcass parameters, meat quality and nutrient digestibility. Is the sex ratio of Japanese quail offspring equal?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1