Mohammad Abufaraj, Yazeed E Alhanbali, Sarah B Al-Qalalweh, Ubadah Froukh, Nabil William G Sweis, Mohammad Yousef Mahmoud, Mohamed A O Kharabsheh, Osama Samara, Shahrokh F Shariat
{"title":"Interrater agreement and reliability of the Bosniak classification for cystic renal masses version 2019.","authors":"Mohammad Abufaraj, Yazeed E Alhanbali, Sarah B Al-Qalalweh, Ubadah Froukh, Nabil William G Sweis, Mohammad Yousef Mahmoud, Mohamed A O Kharabsheh, Osama Samara, Shahrokh F Shariat","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Bosniak classification for cystic renal masses has undergone refinements since its inception. The 2019 version provides more objective criteria to enhance interrater agreement but needs validation. This study compares the interrater agreement of the 2005 and 2019 Bosniak classifications for cystic renal masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty cystic renal masses identified on computed tomography scans were selected, distributed equally among the five classes of the 2005 Bosniak classification. Eight radiology residents participated in 2 consecutive rating sessions using the 2005 and 2019 versions, respectively, with a 1-month wash-out period in between. Interrater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' κ, and changes in cyst classes between the versions were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fleiss' κ values for interrater reliability were 0.354 (0.286-0.431) for 2005 and 0.373 (0.292-0.487) for 2019, indicating fair to moderate agreement. A significant decrease in cyst grades was noted using the 2019 version (Z = 3.49, r = 0.55, P < 0.001) among all cysts assessed by residents and only in complex cysts assessed by consultants (Z = 1.907, r = 0.275, P = 0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interrater agreement was similar for both classifications, ranging from fair to moderate. The 2019 version increased the proportion of masses downgraded to lower classes. Comprehensive training may enhance reliability and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Bosniak classification for cystic renal masses has undergone refinements since its inception. The 2019 version provides more objective criteria to enhance interrater agreement but needs validation. This study compares the interrater agreement of the 2005 and 2019 Bosniak classifications for cystic renal masses.
Methods: Forty cystic renal masses identified on computed tomography scans were selected, distributed equally among the five classes of the 2005 Bosniak classification. Eight radiology residents participated in 2 consecutive rating sessions using the 2005 and 2019 versions, respectively, with a 1-month wash-out period in between. Interrater reliability was assessed using Fleiss' κ, and changes in cyst classes between the versions were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Fleiss' κ values for interrater reliability were 0.354 (0.286-0.431) for 2005 and 0.373 (0.292-0.487) for 2019, indicating fair to moderate agreement. A significant decrease in cyst grades was noted using the 2019 version (Z = 3.49, r = 0.55, P < 0.001) among all cysts assessed by residents and only in complex cysts assessed by consultants (Z = 1.907, r = 0.275, P = 0.048).
Conclusion: Interrater agreement was similar for both classifications, ranging from fair to moderate. The 2019 version increased the proportion of masses downgraded to lower classes. Comprehensive training may enhance reliability and accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.