[Expert consensus on pharmacoeconomic evaluations alongside clinical trials (2024 edition)].

{"title":"[Expert consensus on pharmacoeconomic evaluations alongside clinical trials (2024 edition)].","authors":"","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240422-00954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a technical tool to guide the optimal allocation of healthcare resources, pharmacoeconomic evaluation has been gradually applied to national healthcare decisions, including the adjustment of the National Reimbursement Drug List in China. With the acceleration of drug market approval and access to insurance coverage, the demand for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in healthcare decision-making is also increasing. Designing a pharmacoeconomic evaluation alongside clinical trials has become an important research direction and the source of evidence. In order to facilitate the standardization of this research field, the current consensus focuses on the topic of how to conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation alongside clinical trials from the Chinese healthcare system and decision-making context. The consensus group reconciled expert opinions and developed recommendations covering the entire process of study design, data collection and management, data analysis, and methods and results reporting. A total of 24 recommendations regarding to methodology and practice were developed from eighteen aspects including target population, selection of comparators, calculation of sample size, data collection of healthcare resource utilization, data collection of health-related quality of life, cost analysis, health outcome analysis, addressing the missing and censored data, etc., with the aim to provide reference for scholars and decision makers in this research filed.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"104 40","pages":"3736-3744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240422-00954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a technical tool to guide the optimal allocation of healthcare resources, pharmacoeconomic evaluation has been gradually applied to national healthcare decisions, including the adjustment of the National Reimbursement Drug List in China. With the acceleration of drug market approval and access to insurance coverage, the demand for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in healthcare decision-making is also increasing. Designing a pharmacoeconomic evaluation alongside clinical trials has become an important research direction and the source of evidence. In order to facilitate the standardization of this research field, the current consensus focuses on the topic of how to conduct a pharmacoeconomic evaluation alongside clinical trials from the Chinese healthcare system and decision-making context. The consensus group reconciled expert opinions and developed recommendations covering the entire process of study design, data collection and management, data analysis, and methods and results reporting. A total of 24 recommendations regarding to methodology and practice were developed from eighteen aspects including target population, selection of comparators, calculation of sample size, data collection of healthcare resource utilization, data collection of health-related quality of life, cost analysis, health outcome analysis, addressing the missing and censored data, etc., with the aim to provide reference for scholars and decision makers in this research filed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于临床试验药物经济学评价的专家共识(2024 年版)]。
作为指导医疗资源优化配置的技术工具,药物经济学评价已逐步应用于国家医疗决策,包括中国国家报销药品目录的调整。随着药品上市审批和医保准入的加快,医疗决策中对药物经济学评价的需求也在不断增加。在临床试验的同时设计药物经济学评价已成为重要的研究方向和证据来源。为了促进这一研究领域的规范化,本次共识主要从中国的医疗体系和决策背景出发,探讨如何在进行临床试验的同时进行药物经济学评价。共识小组对专家意见进行了梳理,提出了涵盖研究设计、数据收集与管理、数据分析、方法与结果报告等全过程的建议。从目标人群、比较对象的选择、样本量的计算、医疗资源利用率的数据收集、健康相关生活质量的数据收集、成本分析、健康结果分析、缺失和删减数据的处理等十八个方面共提出了24条方法和实践建议,旨在为该研究领域的学者和决策者提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
期刊最新文献
[A prospective phase Ⅱ clinical trial of toripalimab combined with platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer]. [Analysis and reflections on the current status of diagnosis and treatment of marginal zone lymphoma]. [Application of robot-assisted laparoscopic isthmectomy for the treatment of symptomatic horseshoe kidney]. [Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with TP53 mutation]. [Comparison of microdrill versus diode laser in endoscopic stapedotomy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1