Validation of a risk stratification tool for SARS-CoV-2 Delta community transmission in the Australian Capital Territory.

Alexandra Marmor, Tze Vun Voo, Meru Sheel, Timothy Sloan-Gardner, Nevada Pingault
{"title":"Validation of a risk stratification tool for SARS-CoV-2 Delta community transmission in the Australian Capital Territory.","authors":"Alexandra Marmor, Tze Vun Voo, Meru Sheel, Timothy Sloan-Gardner, Nevada Pingault","doi":"10.33321/cdi.2024.48.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>During the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant outbreak, from August to October 2021 in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), the number of new cases 'in the community for part of their infectious period' was publicly reported daily. We describe the stratification tool used during the outbreak to determine presumptive risk of community transmission from cases, and present the results of a contemporaneous validation of each case's risk against their onward transmission detected by routine surveillance. After case interview, epidemiologists identified the most likely source of infection for each new case and used the stratification tool to classify the case as either no, low, or high risk of community transmission. Each case notified between 12 August and 14 September 2021 was matched to its recipient case(s) to determine how well the tool predicted transmission risk. Household transmissions were excluded. Of the 530 notified cases stratified, 159 (29.3%) were cases who transmitted to a recipient case. Of the 59 cases who were the source of community transmission, 66% (38/59) were undertaking high-risk activities not associated with permitted essential work at the time. Only six source cases stratified as low risk or no risk transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to those outside their own household. The tool was essential in the rapid determination of community transmission risk in the ACT, and validation of the tool against detected onward transmission provided evidence for the effectiveness of public health restrictions. In the early stages of outbreaks of diseases for which transmissibility has not yet been established, the validation of such a stratification tool relies on high quality case investigation data, but may help to understand transmission dynamics and to inform interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":36867,"journal":{"name":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2024.48.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: During the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) variant outbreak, from August to October 2021 in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), the number of new cases 'in the community for part of their infectious period' was publicly reported daily. We describe the stratification tool used during the outbreak to determine presumptive risk of community transmission from cases, and present the results of a contemporaneous validation of each case's risk against their onward transmission detected by routine surveillance. After case interview, epidemiologists identified the most likely source of infection for each new case and used the stratification tool to classify the case as either no, low, or high risk of community transmission. Each case notified between 12 August and 14 September 2021 was matched to its recipient case(s) to determine how well the tool predicted transmission risk. Household transmissions were excluded. Of the 530 notified cases stratified, 159 (29.3%) were cases who transmitted to a recipient case. Of the 59 cases who were the source of community transmission, 66% (38/59) were undertaking high-risk activities not associated with permitted essential work at the time. Only six source cases stratified as low risk or no risk transmitted SARS-CoV-2 to those outside their own household. The tool was essential in the rapid determination of community transmission risk in the ACT, and validation of the tool against detected onward transmission provided evidence for the effectiveness of public health restrictions. In the early stages of outbreaks of diseases for which transmissibility has not yet been established, the validation of such a stratification tool relies on high quality case investigation data, but may help to understand transmission dynamics and to inform interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证澳大利亚首都地区 SARS-CoV-2 三角洲社区传播的风险分层工具。
摘要:2021年8月至10月,澳大利亚首都地区(ACT)爆发了SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2)变异体疫情,在此期间,每天都会公开报告 "部分感染期在社区内 "的新病例数量。我们描述了疫情爆发期间用于确定病例社区传播推定风险的分层工具,并介绍了根据常规监测发现的病例继续传播情况对每个病例的风险进行同期验证的结果。在对病例进行访谈后,流行病学专家确定了每个新病例最可能的感染源,并使用分层工具将病例划分为无社区传播风险、低社区传播风险或高社区传播风险。2021 年 8 月 12 日至 9 月 14 日期间通报的每个病例都与接收病例进行了比对,以确定该工具预测传播风险的准确性。家庭传播被排除在外。在分层的 530 个通报病例中,有 159 个病例(29.3%)传播给了接收病例。在 59 个社区传播源病例中,66%(38/59)当时正在从事与获准的基本工作无关的高风险活动。只有 6 个被分层为低风险或无风险的源头病例将 SARS-CoV-2 传染给了自己家庭以外的人。该工具对于快速确定澳大利亚首都地区的社区传播风险至关重要,而根据检测到的继续传播情况对该工具进行验证则为公共卫生限制措施的有效性提供了证据。在传播性尚未确定的疾病爆发的早期阶段,这种分层工具的验证依赖于高质量的病例调查数据,但可能有助于了解传播动态并为干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Measles secondary vaccine failure in a childcare setting: an outbreak report. Meningococcal Surveillance Australia: Reporting period 1 April to 30 June 2024. Meningococcal Surveillance Australia: Reporting period 1 January to 31 March 2024. Never waste a measles outbreak. Learning from COVID-19: strengthening Australia's research capacity through preparedness and collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1