Assessment of the Mental Health of Police Officers: A Systematic Review of Specific Instruments.

Davi Oliveira Teles, Raquel Alves de Oliveira, Anna Luísa de Oliveira Parnaíba, Mariana Araújo Rios, Melissa Bezerra Machado, Priscila de Souza Aquino, Purdenciana Ribeiro de Menezes, Samila Gomes Ribeiro, Paula Renata Amorim Lessa Soares, Camila Biazus Dalcin, Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro
{"title":"Assessment of the Mental Health of Police Officers: A Systematic Review of Specific Instruments.","authors":"Davi Oliveira Teles, Raquel Alves de Oliveira, Anna Luísa de Oliveira Parnaíba, Mariana Araújo Rios, Melissa Bezerra Machado, Priscila de Souza Aquino, Purdenciana Ribeiro de Menezes, Samila Gomes Ribeiro, Paula Renata Amorim Lessa Soares, Camila Biazus Dalcin, Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21101300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to identify validated instruments from the literature that assess the mental health of police officers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review of validated instruments used to assess the mental health of police officers. Searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL/EBSCO, and Virtual Health Library databases. This review follows the JBI Manual for Systematic Reviews and the PRISMA statement. The methodological quality of the articles and the risk of bias were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1530 studies were identified across the six databases, with 158 studies read in full by the authors after excluding duplicates and those that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The final 29 studies were analyzed for methodological quality and risk of bias using the AXIS and SFS-D tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review identified 27 self-administered validated instruments useful for assessing various mental health outcomes in police officers, with the most frequently used being the Police Stress Questionnaire. These findings may help guide security force administration, occupational health professionals, and mental health researchers in selecting and implementing psychometrically reliable instruments for screening the mental health of police officers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to identify validated instruments from the literature that assess the mental health of police officers.

Methods: This is a systematic review of validated instruments used to assess the mental health of police officers. Searches were conducted in the MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL/EBSCO, and Virtual Health Library databases. This review follows the JBI Manual for Systematic Reviews and the PRISMA statement. The methodological quality of the articles and the risk of bias were assessed.

Results: A total of 1530 studies were identified across the six databases, with 158 studies read in full by the authors after excluding duplicates and those that did not meet the inclusion criteria. The final 29 studies were analyzed for methodological quality and risk of bias using the AXIS and SFS-D tools.

Conclusion: This review identified 27 self-administered validated instruments useful for assessing various mental health outcomes in police officers, with the most frequently used being the Police Stress Questionnaire. These findings may help guide security force administration, occupational health professionals, and mental health researchers in selecting and implementing psychometrically reliable instruments for screening the mental health of police officers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警官心理健康评估:对特定工具的系统回顾。
目的目的是从文献中找出评估警官心理健康的有效工具:这是对用于评估警官心理健康的有效工具的系统性回顾。在 MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、CINAHL/EBSCO 和 Virtual Health Library 数据库中进行了检索。本综述遵循《JBI 系统综述手册》和 PRISMA 声明。对文章的方法学质量和偏倚风险进行了评估:六个数据库共检索到 1530 项研究,在排除重复和不符合纳入标准的研究后,作者全文阅读了 158 项研究。作者使用 AXIS 和 SFS-D 工具对最后 29 项研究的方法学质量和偏倚风险进行了分析:本综述确定了 27 种可用于评估警官各种心理健康结果的自填式有效工具,其中最常用的是警察压力问卷。这些发现可能有助于指导安全部队管理部门、职业健康专业人员和心理健康研究人员选择和使用心理计量学上可靠的工具来筛查警务人员的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
期刊最新文献
Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Multimorbidity: The Agreement Between Patient and General Practitioner-Reported Drugs Observed in a Pilot cRCT. Towards 'Formalising' WhatsApp Teledermatology Practice in KZ-N District Hospitals: Key Informant Interviews. Cultural Insiders and Graphic Stories to Promote Research Readiness Among the South Asian Community: A Focus on Purpose, Protection, and Participation. Musculoskeletal, Pulmonary, and Cardiovascular COVID-19 Sequelae in the Context of Firefighter Occupational Health: A Narrative Review. Online and Face-to-Face Mat Pilates Training for Long COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Health Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1