Social Determinants of Health Affect Psychological Distress among People with Disabilities.

Jessica Kersey, Amie Devlin, Sarah Shyres, Emily A Kringle, Ashley J Housten
{"title":"Social Determinants of Health Affect Psychological Distress among People with Disabilities.","authors":"Jessica Kersey, Amie Devlin, Sarah Shyres, Emily A Kringle, Ashley J Housten","doi":"10.3390/ijerph21101359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People with disabilities experience inequitable exposure to social determinants of health (SDOH) that contribute to disparate health outcomes, including psychological distress. There is little research examining which SDOH have the strongest effect on psychological distress among people with disabilities. This leaves healthcare providers and policy makers with insufficient information to make well-informed treatment decisions or allocate resources effectively. We explored the association between SDOH and disability and which factors may moderate the association between disability and psychological distress. Using data from the US Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey (Phase 3.5), we examined SDOH among people with and without disability (<i>n</i> = 26,354). Among people with disability, the odds of severe psychological distress were highest among those who had low incomes (OR = 4.41, 95% CI: 3.51-5.60), were food insecure (OR = 3.75, 95% CI: 3.43-4.10), housing insecure (OR = 3.17, 95% CI: 2.82-3.58), or were unable to work (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.80-2.18). Only difficulty paying for household expenses moderated the association between disability and severe psychological distress (OR = 9.81, 95% CI: 7.11-13.64). These findings suggest that supporting employment and economic opportunities and improving access to safe and affordable housing and food may improve psychological well-being among people with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49056,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11507995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21101359","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People with disabilities experience inequitable exposure to social determinants of health (SDOH) that contribute to disparate health outcomes, including psychological distress. There is little research examining which SDOH have the strongest effect on psychological distress among people with disabilities. This leaves healthcare providers and policy makers with insufficient information to make well-informed treatment decisions or allocate resources effectively. We explored the association between SDOH and disability and which factors may moderate the association between disability and psychological distress. Using data from the US Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey (Phase 3.5), we examined SDOH among people with and without disability (n = 26,354). Among people with disability, the odds of severe psychological distress were highest among those who had low incomes (OR = 4.41, 95% CI: 3.51-5.60), were food insecure (OR = 3.75, 95% CI: 3.43-4.10), housing insecure (OR = 3.17, 95% CI: 2.82-3.58), or were unable to work (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.80-2.18). Only difficulty paying for household expenses moderated the association between disability and severe psychological distress (OR = 9.81, 95% CI: 7.11-13.64). These findings suggest that supporting employment and economic opportunities and improving access to safe and affordable housing and food may improve psychological well-being among people with disabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康的社会决定因素影响残疾人的心理压力。
残障人士会不公平地接触到健康的社会决定因素 (SDOH),这些因素会导致不同的健康结果,包括心理困扰。目前几乎没有研究表明哪些 SDOH 对残疾人的心理困扰影响最大。这使得医疗服务提供者和政策制定者没有足够的信息来做出明智的治疗决策或有效地分配资源。我们探讨了 SDOH 与残疾之间的关联,以及哪些因素可能会缓和残疾与心理困扰之间的关联。我们利用美国人口普查局家庭脉搏调查(第 3.5 阶段)的数据,研究了残疾人和非残疾人(n = 26,354 人)的 SDOH 状况。在残疾人士中,收入低(OR = 4.41,95% CI:3.51-5.60)、食物无保障(OR = 3.75,95% CI:3.43-4.10)、住房无保障(OR = 3.17,95% CI:2.82-3.58)或无法工作(OR = 1.98,95% CI:1.80-2.18)的人士出现严重心理困扰的几率最高。只有支付家庭开支的困难减缓了残疾与严重心理困扰之间的关联(OR = 9.81,95% CI:7.11-13.64)。这些研究结果表明,为残疾人提供就业和经济机会,改善他们获得安全、可负担得起的住房和食物的条件,可以改善他们的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14422
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH) (ISSN 1660-4601) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles, critical reviews, research notes, and short communications in the interdisciplinary area of environmental health sciences and public health. It links several scientific disciplines including biology, biochemistry, biotechnology, cellular and molecular biology, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, microbiology, oncology, pathology, pharmacology, and toxicology, in an integrated fashion, to address critical issues related to environmental quality and public health. Therefore, IJERPH focuses on the publication of scientific and technical information on the impacts of natural phenomena and anthropogenic factors on the quality of our environment, the interrelationships between environmental health and the quality of life, as well as the socio-cultural, political, economic, and legal considerations related to environmental stewardship and public health. The 2018 IJERPH Outstanding Reviewer Award has been launched! This award acknowledge those who have generously dedicated their time to review manuscripts submitted to IJERPH. See full details at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/awards.
期刊最新文献
Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Multimorbidity: The Agreement Between Patient and General Practitioner-Reported Drugs Observed in a Pilot cRCT. Towards 'Formalising' WhatsApp Teledermatology Practice in KZ-N District Hospitals: Key Informant Interviews. Cultural Insiders and Graphic Stories to Promote Research Readiness Among the South Asian Community: A Focus on Purpose, Protection, and Participation. Musculoskeletal, Pulmonary, and Cardiovascular COVID-19 Sequelae in the Context of Firefighter Occupational Health: A Narrative Review. Online and Face-to-Face Mat Pilates Training for Long COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Health Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1