Perceptions of childhood immunization in São Paulo: quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Sao Paulo Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0447.R1.05062024
Lucas de Brito Costa, Carolina Nunes França, Luiz Henrique da Silva Nali, Patrícia Colombo-Souza, Neil Ferreira Novo, Yára Juliano
{"title":"Perceptions of childhood immunization in São Paulo: quantitative-qualitative cross-sectional study.","authors":"Lucas de Brito Costa, Carolina Nunes França, Luiz Henrique da Silva Nali, Patrícia Colombo-Souza, Neil Ferreira Novo, Yára Juliano","doi":"10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0447.R1.05062024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination hesitation spans from historical diseases such as smallpox to the current challenges with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In Brazil, vaccination faces obstacles related to trust and convenience. Despite the National Immunization Program, fear of adverse effects as well as misinformation challenge confidence in vaccines, and anti-vaccine movements have gained momentum.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigated childhood vaccine refusal, including COVID-19 vaccines, by comparing the reasons for and sociodemographic differences between vaccinated individuals and those who hesitated or refused immunization.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, using questionnaires administered during pediatric consultations between January and April 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigated vaccine hesitancy and the attitudes of parents and caregivers of children (0-12 years) towards vaccines. The questionnaire was administered during routine pediatric consultations at three different locations, each with 50 participants for a total of 150 participants, to avoid selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Marked differences were evident among caregivers in terms of sex, race, income, education, and religion, which influenced their attitudes toward vaccination. There was an increase in the refusal of seasonal vaccinations and a significant distrust of the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine (52%), with concerns about its side effects. Although most patients did not stop vaccination, significant delays occurred, especially in the clinical setting (58%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the importance of childhood health decisions, indicating the need to build trust in vaccines, tailor health policies, and investigate the causes of distrust to promote childhood immunizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49574,"journal":{"name":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","volume":"142 6","pages":"e2023447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0447.R1.05062024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vaccination hesitation spans from historical diseases such as smallpox to the current challenges with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In Brazil, vaccination faces obstacles related to trust and convenience. Despite the National Immunization Program, fear of adverse effects as well as misinformation challenge confidence in vaccines, and anti-vaccine movements have gained momentum.

Objectives: This study investigated childhood vaccine refusal, including COVID-19 vaccines, by comparing the reasons for and sociodemographic differences between vaccinated individuals and those who hesitated or refused immunization.

Design and setting: A cross-sectional study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, using questionnaires administered during pediatric consultations between January and April 2023.

Methods: This study investigated vaccine hesitancy and the attitudes of parents and caregivers of children (0-12 years) towards vaccines. The questionnaire was administered during routine pediatric consultations at three different locations, each with 50 participants for a total of 150 participants, to avoid selection bias.

Results: Marked differences were evident among caregivers in terms of sex, race, income, education, and religion, which influenced their attitudes toward vaccination. There was an increase in the refusal of seasonal vaccinations and a significant distrust of the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine (52%), with concerns about its side effects. Although most patients did not stop vaccination, significant delays occurred, especially in the clinical setting (58%).

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the importance of childhood health decisions, indicating the need to build trust in vaccines, tailor health policies, and investigate the causes of distrust to promote childhood immunizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣保罗对儿童免疫接种的看法:定量-定性横断面研究。
背景:从历史上的天花等疾病到现在的冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19),疫苗接种都让人犹豫不决。在巴西,疫苗接种面临着与信任和便利性有关的障碍。尽管实施了国家免疫计划,但对不良影响的恐惧和错误信息挑战着人们对疫苗的信心,反疫苗运动的势头日益高涨:本研究通过比较已接种疫苗者与犹豫不决或拒绝接种者之间的原因和社会人口学差异,调查儿童拒绝接种疫苗(包括 COVID-19 疫苗)的情况:在巴西圣保罗进行了一项横断面研究,在 2023 年 1 月至 4 月期间的儿科就诊过程中进行了问卷调查:本研究调查了儿童(0-12 岁)家长和看护人对疫苗接种的犹豫和态度。为避免选择偏差,问卷调查在三个不同地点的儿科常规咨询中进行,每个地点有 50 名参与者,共计 150 名参与者:结果:护理人员在性别、种族、收入、教育程度和宗教信仰方面存在明显差异,这影响了他们对疫苗接种的态度。拒绝接受季节性疫苗接种的人数有所增加,对 COVID-19 疫苗疗效的不信任度明显增加(52%),并担心其副作用。虽然大多数患者没有停止接种,但出现了严重的延误,尤其是在临床环境中(58%):本研究强调了儿童健康决策的重要性,表明有必要建立对疫苗的信任、调整卫生政策并调查不信任的原因,以促进儿童免疫接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Sao Paulo Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published bimonthly by the Associação Paulista de Medicina, the journal accepts articles in the fields of clinical health science (internal medicine, gynecology and obstetrics, mental health, surgery, pediatrics and public health). Articles will be accepted in the form of original articles (clinical trials, cohort, case-control, prevalence, incidence, accuracy and cost-effectiveness studies and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis), narrative reviews of the literature, case reports, short communications and letters to the editor. Papers with a commercial objective will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis prediction of prostate and testicular cancer mortality using machine learning: accuracy study. Effectiveness of short term acute electroconvulsive therapy at three Brazilian sites: an observational cohort study. Sociodemographic and clinical profiles of patients receiving home care and the occurrence and management of healthcare-associated infections: a cross-sectional study. Analyzing the effectivity of evidence-based practice in health science higher education: a narrative review. The relationship between insulin resistance and fibroblast growth factor 23 in patients with non-diabetic pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1