Erin R Weinhold, Christina L Vaughan, Mary O'Hara, Elizabeth M Bloemen, Delia Bakeman, Simon Ducharme, Peter S Pressman
{"title":"Clinical considerations regarding suspected \"BvFTD-by-proxy\": a case series.","authors":"Erin R Weinhold, Christina L Vaughan, Mary O'Hara, Elizabeth M Bloemen, Delia Bakeman, Simon Ducharme, Peter S Pressman","doi":"10.1080/13554794.2024.2419177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) often relies on informant reports of significant behavioral changes. \"BvFTD-by-proxy\" describes situations of neuropsychiatric changes reported solely by an informant under circumstances that may raise questions regarding their objectivity. We present three cases of bvFTD-like symptoms reported by spouses, where progression was unclear, testing showed mild but stable executive dysfunction, and neuroimaging was unremarkable. The subjective nature of bvFTD criteria leaves patients vulnerable to misleading informant reports, especially amid relational discord, and may threaten patient autonomy. Recognizing and managing this situation is critical but time-consuming, often requiring coordinated care across multiple providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49762,"journal":{"name":"Neurocase","volume":" ","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocase","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13554794.2024.2419177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) often relies on informant reports of significant behavioral changes. "BvFTD-by-proxy" describes situations of neuropsychiatric changes reported solely by an informant under circumstances that may raise questions regarding their objectivity. We present three cases of bvFTD-like symptoms reported by spouses, where progression was unclear, testing showed mild but stable executive dysfunction, and neuroimaging was unremarkable. The subjective nature of bvFTD criteria leaves patients vulnerable to misleading informant reports, especially amid relational discord, and may threaten patient autonomy. Recognizing and managing this situation is critical but time-consuming, often requiring coordinated care across multiple providers.
期刊介绍：
Neurocase is a rapid response journal of case studies and innovative group studies in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology that speak to the neural basis of cognition. Four types of manuscript are considered for publication: single case investigations that bear directly on issues of relevance to theoretical issues or brain-behavior relationships; group studies of subjects with brain dysfunction that address issues relevant to the understanding of human cognition; reviews of important topics in the domains of neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry and behavioral neurology; and brief reports (up to 2500 words) that replicate previous reports dealing with issues of considerable significance. Of particular interest are investigations that include precise anatomical localization of lesions or neural activity via imaging or other techniques, as well as studies of patients with neurodegenerative diseases, since these diseases are becoming more common as our population ages. Topic reviews are included in most issues.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
