Best Evidence Summary for the Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Orthopaedic Patients

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/jocn.17507
Liqiong Zhou, Yinfeng Hu, Dan Ma, Bowen Ren, Juan Cui, Qian Zhou, Meiyi Wang, Juan Li, Peilan Zhang, Xiaoxuan Qi
{"title":"Best Evidence Summary for the Prevention of Pressure Injuries in Orthopaedic Patients","authors":"Liqiong Zhou,&nbsp;Yinfeng Hu,&nbsp;Dan Ma,&nbsp;Bowen Ren,&nbsp;Juan Cui,&nbsp;Qian Zhou,&nbsp;Meiyi Wang,&nbsp;Juan Li,&nbsp;Peilan Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoxuan Qi","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To systematically search, evaluate and synthesise the most robust evidence regarding pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients admitted to general wards.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The present study provides an evidence-based summary of the most robust findings, adhering to the evidence guidelines established by the Center for Evidence-Based Nursing of Fudan University.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>According to the “6S” model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on pressure injury prevention among orthopaedic patients in general wards. The types of literature included guidelines, clinical decisions, expert Consensus, evidence summaries, etc. The search period covered the time from the beginning of the database up to December 2023.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Source<b>s</b></h3>\n \n <p>The following databases and resources were systematically searched: Up To Date, JBI, NICE, WOCN, NZWCS, etc.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen literature sources were included, comprising one clinical decision, eight guidelines, one systematic review, and one expert Consensus. In these sources, a comprehensive collection of 34 pieces of best evidence was formed across six key topics: risk assessment, position management, skin care, device used for device-related pressure injury, nutritional assessment, and support, as well as health education and training. Among the evidence gathered, a strong recommendation was made for 18 pieces, while the remaining 16 received a weak recommendation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the most robust evidence on pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients, encompassing 34 pieces of evidence that can serve as valuable references for clinical practice. Before implementing this evidence, it is crucial to evaluate the specific contextual factors within different countries and medical institutions, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing its application by healthcare professionals and patient's preferences. Furthermore, targeted evidence selection should be conducted through careful screening and subsequent adjustments in implementation, thereby offering a more scientifically grounded basis for clinical nursing practice. Future research endeavours should prioritise investigating strategies for effective evidence utilisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for the Profession and Patient Care</h3>\n \n <p>The prevention of pressure injuries poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic patients. This study presents a synthesis of 34 pieces of best evidence to provide guidance on preventive measures for pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Adhering to and implementing these 34 pieces of evidence can effectively aid in preventing pressure injuries in clinical practice. This evidence encompasses risk assessment, position management, skin care, device usage for device-related pressure injuries, nutritional support and evaluation, and health education and training, establishing a comprehensive and systematic implementation process. Assessing the risk of pressure injuries during interventions serves as an essential prerequisite for developing effective strategies to prevent such injuries among orthopaedic patients. Ultimately, this study will offer valuable guidance to healthcare professionals worldwide regarding preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Impact</h3>\n \n <p>Upon admission to the hospital, it is essential to conduct a risk assessment and implement evidence-based, individualised prevention measures for pressure ulcers in patients to prevent their occurrence. This study will provide valuable insights into preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients admitted to orthopaedic wards for healthcare workers worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> State</h3>\n \n <p>The PRIMA manifest is utilised during the text preparation process.</p>\n \n <p><b>Trail Registration:</b> ES20245365</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":"33 12","pages":"4651-4664"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.17507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To systematically search, evaluate and synthesise the most robust evidence regarding pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients admitted to general wards.

Design

The present study provides an evidence-based summary of the most robust findings, adhering to the evidence guidelines established by the Center for Evidence-Based Nursing of Fudan University.

Method

According to the “6S” model, a systematic search was conducted for literature on pressure injury prevention among orthopaedic patients in general wards. The types of literature included guidelines, clinical decisions, expert Consensus, evidence summaries, etc. The search period covered the time from the beginning of the database up to December 2023.

Data Sources

The following databases and resources were systematically searched: Up To Date, JBI, NICE, WOCN, NZWCS, etc.

Results

Fifteen literature sources were included, comprising one clinical decision, eight guidelines, one systematic review, and one expert Consensus. In these sources, a comprehensive collection of 34 pieces of best evidence was formed across six key topics: risk assessment, position management, skin care, device used for device-related pressure injury, nutritional assessment, and support, as well as health education and training. Among the evidence gathered, a strong recommendation was made for 18 pieces, while the remaining 16 received a weak recommendation.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the most robust evidence on pressure injury prevention in orthopaedic patients, encompassing 34 pieces of evidence that can serve as valuable references for clinical practice. Before implementing this evidence, it is crucial to evaluate the specific contextual factors within different countries and medical institutions, as well as the facilitators and barriers influencing its application by healthcare professionals and patient's preferences. Furthermore, targeted evidence selection should be conducted through careful screening and subsequent adjustments in implementation, thereby offering a more scientifically grounded basis for clinical nursing practice. Future research endeavours should prioritise investigating strategies for effective evidence utilisation.

Implications for the Profession and Patient Care

The prevention of pressure injuries poses a significant challenge for orthopaedic patients. This study presents a synthesis of 34 pieces of best evidence to provide guidance on preventive measures for pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients. Adhering to and implementing these 34 pieces of evidence can effectively aid in preventing pressure injuries in clinical practice. This evidence encompasses risk assessment, position management, skin care, device usage for device-related pressure injuries, nutritional support and evaluation, and health education and training, establishing a comprehensive and systematic implementation process. Assessing the risk of pressure injuries during interventions serves as an essential prerequisite for developing effective strategies to prevent such injuries among orthopaedic patients. Ultimately, this study will offer valuable guidance to healthcare professionals worldwide regarding preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients.

Impact

Upon admission to the hospital, it is essential to conduct a risk assessment and implement evidence-based, individualised prevention measures for pressure ulcers in patients to prevent their occurrence. This study will provide valuable insights into preventing pressure injuries in orthopaedic patients admitted to orthopaedic wards for healthcare workers worldwide.

State

The PRIMA manifest is utilised during the text preparation process.

Trail Registration: ES20245365

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防骨科患者压力性损伤的最佳证据摘要。
目的:系统地搜索、评估和综合有关普通病房骨科患者压力损伤预防的最可靠证据:本研究根据复旦大学循证护理研究中心制定的循证指南,对最可靠的研究结果进行循证总结:根据 "6S "模式,对普通病房骨科患者压伤预防的相关文献进行了系统检索。文献类型包括指南、临床决定、专家共识、证据摘要等。检索期从数据库建立之初至 2023 年 12 月:系统检索了以下数据库和资源:Up To Date、JBI、NICE、WOCN、NZWCS 等。结果:共收录了 15 篇文献资料,包括 1 份临床决定、8 份指南、1 份系统综述和 1 份专家共识。在这些来源中,全面收集了 34 项最佳证据,涉及六个关键主题:风险评估、体位管理、皮肤护理、用于器械相关压力损伤的器械、营养评估和支持,以及健康教育和培训。在收集到的证据中,有 18 项证据获得了强烈推荐,其余 16 项证据获得了弱推荐:本研究全面综述了有关骨科患者压力损伤预防的最有力证据,包括 34 项证据,可作为临床实践的宝贵参考。在实施这些证据之前,关键是要评估不同国家和医疗机构的具体环境因素,以及影响医护人员应用这些证据的促进因素和障碍以及患者的偏好。此外,应通过仔细筛选进行有针对性的证据选择,并在实施过程中进行后续调整,从而为临床护理实践提供更科学的依据。未来的研究工作应优先考虑调查有效利用证据的策略:预防压伤对骨科患者来说是一项重大挑战。本研究综述了 34 项最佳证据,为骨科患者压力性损伤的预防措施提供指导。在临床实践中,遵守和执行这 34 项证据可有效帮助预防压力性损伤。这些证据包括风险评估、体位管理、皮肤护理、器械相关压力损伤的器械使用、营养支持和评估以及健康教育和培训,建立了一个全面系统的实施流程。评估干预过程中的压力损伤风险是制定有效策略预防骨科患者压力损伤的必要前提。最终,这项研究将为全球医护人员预防骨科患者压力伤提供有价值的指导:入院后,必须对患者进行风险评估,并实施循证、个性化的压疮预防措施,以防止压疮的发生。这项研究将为全球医护人员提供预防骨科病房骨科患者压伤的宝贵见解:在文本准备过程中使用了 PRIMA 清单:ES20245365.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Clinicians' and Patients' Experiences and Perceptions on the Prevention and Management of Surgical Site Infections: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. The Vital Signs Criteria Suffers From Poor Accuracy to Recognise Critically Ill Patients. Exploring the Experiences of Community-Dwelling Older Adults Participating in Group Interaction Programs: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Issue Information Isolated and Combined Effects of Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1