The Impact of Standardized Training Resident on Pain Management in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Cancer Education Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5
Hai-Zhen Yi, Wei Lv, Jin-Jing Chen, Zhan Lin
{"title":"The Impact of Standardized Training Resident on Pain Management in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer.","authors":"Hai-Zhen Yi, Wei Lv, Jin-Jing Chen, Zhan Lin","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of Standardized Training Resident on pharmacological interventions for pain management in patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 84 patients with advanced lung cancer and associated pain were enrolled in the study from December 2019 to August 2023 and were divided into two groups based on their attending physician: a group managed by physician-ST Training Physicians (joint group) (n = 42) and physician-only group (usual group) (n = 42). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), oral morphine equivalent, and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the Pain Management Index (PMI) was calculated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at the 4-week follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). At week 4, compared to the usual group, the four BPI pain intensity categories were significantly lower in the joint group [worst pain: 4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9); least pain: 1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4); average pain: 2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6); pain right now: 1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)] (all P > 0.05). The hospital stay duration was significantly reduced; for the seven pain interference categories, there were no significant improvements in the joint group. Significantly more patients achieved adequate pain control in the joint group than the usual group (p = .002). A reduction in OMEDD scores was observed for both cohorts, and the joint group's reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Standardized Training for Radiation Oncology Physicians may lead to improved pharmacological interventions and enhanced pain relief. Recognizing the importance of these trainees in the healthcare team is crucial for achieving optimal pain management outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02519-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of Standardized Training Resident on pharmacological interventions for pain management in patients with advanced lung cancer. A total of 84 patients with advanced lung cancer and associated pain were enrolled in the study from December 2019 to August 2023 and were divided into two groups based on their attending physician: a group managed by physician-ST Training Physicians (joint group) (n = 42) and physician-only group (usual group) (n = 42). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), oral morphine equivalent, and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, the Pain Management Index (PMI) was calculated. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed at the 4-week follow-up using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). At week 4, compared to the usual group, the four BPI pain intensity categories were significantly lower in the joint group [worst pain: 4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9); least pain: 1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4); average pain: 2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6); pain right now: 1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)] (all P > 0.05). The hospital stay duration was significantly reduced; for the seven pain interference categories, there were no significant improvements in the joint group. Significantly more patients achieved adequate pain control in the joint group than the usual group (p = .002). A reduction in OMEDD scores was observed for both cohorts, and the joint group's reduction was statistically more significant (p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in HRQoL between the two groups. Standardized Training for Radiation Oncology Physicians may lead to improved pharmacological interventions and enhanced pain relief. Recognizing the importance of these trainees in the healthcare team is crucial for achieving optimal pain management outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准化培训驻地对晚期肺癌患者疼痛管理的影响。
本研究旨在探讨标准化培训住院医师对晚期肺癌患者疼痛治疗的药物干预效果。该研究从2019年12月至2023年8月共纳入84名晚期肺癌伴疼痛患者,并根据其主治医生分为两组:由医生-ST培训医生管理组(联合组)(n = 42)和仅由医生管理组(常规组)(n = 42)。简明疼痛量表(BPI)、口服吗啡当量和住院时间。此外,还计算了疼痛管理指数(PMI)。在4周的随访中,使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30(EORTC QLQ-C30)对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)进行了评估。第 4 周时,与普通组相比,关节组的四个 BPI 疼痛强度类别均显著降低[最严重疼痛:4 (3-5) vs 8 (3-5)] :最严重疼痛:4 (3-5) vs 8 (7-9);最轻微疼痛:1 (0-2) vs 3 (1-4);一般疼痛:2 (1-2) vs 5 (4-6);现在疼痛:1.2 (0.7-1.5) vs 1.5 (1-2):1.2 (0.7-1.9) vs 4 (3-5)](所有 P > 0.05)。住院时间明显缩短;在七个疼痛干扰类别中,关节组没有明显改善。关节组获得充分疼痛控制的患者明显多于普通组(P = .002)。两组患者的 OMEDD 评分均有所下降,而关节组的下降幅度在统计学上更为显著(p = 0.016)。两组在 HRQoL 方面没有明显差异。对放射肿瘤科医生进行标准化培训可改善药物干预,增强疼痛缓解效果。认识到这些受训人员在医疗团队中的重要性对于取得最佳疼痛治疗效果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
期刊最新文献
"Frontiers in Neoplasia" Curriculum is a Good Start, and More Can be Done. Expanding the Scope of Multidisciplinary Oncology Education: A Necessary Step Forward. An Analysis of Print and Online Media's Representation of Prostate Cancer in Public Figure. 2024 International Cancer Education Conference Abstracts. Are Sport and Exercise Science Students Receiving Enough Training to Adequately Design Exercise Programs for Patients with Cancer, Overweight, or Obesity in Spain? A Comprehensive Archival and Survey Analysis of 52 Spanish Universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1