Safety and adherence of early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a primary care setting: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1186/s13223-024-00916-5
Victoria Landry, Rachel Lewis, William Lewis, Lyndsey MacDonald, Beth Carson, Kavish Chandra, Jacqueline Fraser, Andrew J Flewelling, Paul Atkinson, Chris Vaillancourt
{"title":"Safety and adherence of early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a primary care setting: a retrospective cross-sectional study.","authors":"Victoria Landry, Rachel Lewis, William Lewis, Lyndsey MacDonald, Beth Carson, Kavish Chandra, Jacqueline Fraser, Andrew J Flewelling, Paul Atkinson, Chris Vaillancourt","doi":"10.1186/s13223-024-00916-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peanut allergy is a common food allergy with potentially life-threatening implications. Early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (P-EOIT) has been shown to be effective and safe in research and specialty clinic settings. Provision of P-EOIT in primary care would make it available to more patients. We sought to assess the safety of P-EOIT in a primary care setting by documenting the rates of peanut-related allergic reactions leading to emergency department (ED) visits and use of epinephrine. We also examined adherence by assessing the percentage of patients reaching maintenance phase and continuing ingestion after one year of P-EOIT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included all patients aged less than 36 months who started P-EOIT at a primary care allergy clinic in New Brunswick, Canada, from 2016 to 2020. The population included patients who (1) had a history of an allergic reaction to peanuts with a positive skin prick test or positive peanut specific IgE level (ps-IgE) or (2) no history of ingestion and a baseline ps-IgE ≥5 kU/L. Patients had biweekly clinic visits with graded increases in peanut protein up to a maintenance dose of 300 mg of peanut protein daily. A blinded retrospective review of paper charts and electronic medical records was conducted along with phone interviews regarding ED visits and epinephrine use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 69 consented patients reached maintenance dose over a median of 29 weeks, and 66 patients (95.7%) were still regularly consuming peanut protein after 1 year of maintenance. One patient had a peanut ingestion-related ED visit requiring epinephrine during the escalation phase of peanut protein dosing (1.4%). During the first year of maintenance phase, no patients had peanut ingestion-related ED visits nor required epinephrine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a primary care setting appears to be safe and our findings suggest that it does not lead to an increased burden of emergency department visits. Our population had high adherence rates, with the majority achieving maintenance dose and staying on this dose for one year.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":"20 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-024-00916-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peanut allergy is a common food allergy with potentially life-threatening implications. Early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (P-EOIT) has been shown to be effective and safe in research and specialty clinic settings. Provision of P-EOIT in primary care would make it available to more patients. We sought to assess the safety of P-EOIT in a primary care setting by documenting the rates of peanut-related allergic reactions leading to emergency department (ED) visits and use of epinephrine. We also examined adherence by assessing the percentage of patients reaching maintenance phase and continuing ingestion after one year of P-EOIT.

Methods: This retrospective study included all patients aged less than 36 months who started P-EOIT at a primary care allergy clinic in New Brunswick, Canada, from 2016 to 2020. The population included patients who (1) had a history of an allergic reaction to peanuts with a positive skin prick test or positive peanut specific IgE level (ps-IgE) or (2) no history of ingestion and a baseline ps-IgE ≥5 kU/L. Patients had biweekly clinic visits with graded increases in peanut protein up to a maintenance dose of 300 mg of peanut protein daily. A blinded retrospective review of paper charts and electronic medical records was conducted along with phone interviews regarding ED visits and epinephrine use.

Results: All 69 consented patients reached maintenance dose over a median of 29 weeks, and 66 patients (95.7%) were still regularly consuming peanut protein after 1 year of maintenance. One patient had a peanut ingestion-related ED visit requiring epinephrine during the escalation phase of peanut protein dosing (1.4%). During the first year of maintenance phase, no patients had peanut ingestion-related ED visits nor required epinephrine.

Conclusion: Early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a primary care setting appears to be safe and our findings suggest that it does not lead to an increased burden of emergency department visits. Our population had high adherence rates, with the majority achieving maintenance dose and staying on this dose for one year.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层医疗机构早期口服免疫疗法治疗花生过敏的安全性和依从性:一项回顾性横断面研究。
背景:花生过敏是一种常见的食物过敏,有可能危及生命。在研究和专科门诊中,针对花生过敏的早期口服免疫疗法(P-EOIT)已被证明是有效和安全的。在基层医疗机构提供花生过敏早期口服免疫疗法将使更多患者受益。我们试图通过记录导致急诊室就诊和使用肾上腺素的花生相关过敏反应发生率来评估 P-EOIT 在初级医疗机构的安全性。我们还通过评估在服用 P-EOIT 一年后达到维持阶段并继续摄入的患者比例来考察患者的依从性:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2016 年至 2020 年期间在加拿大新不伦瑞克省一家初级过敏诊所开始使用 P-EOIT 的所有年龄小于 36 个月的患者。研究对象包括以下患者:(1)有花生过敏史,皮肤点刺试验阳性或花生特异性 IgE 水平(ps-IgE)阳性;或(2)无花生摄入史,基线 ps-IgE ≥5 kU/L。患者每两周接受一次门诊,花生蛋白的摄入量逐级增加,维持剂量为每天 300 毫克花生蛋白。对纸质病历和电子病历进行了盲法回顾性检查,并就急诊室就诊和肾上腺素使用情况进行了电话访谈:所有 69 名获得同意的患者都在中位数 29 周内达到了维持剂量,66 名患者(95.7%)在维持 1 年后仍定期食用花生蛋白。在花生蛋白剂量增加阶段,有一名患者因摄入花生导致急诊就医,需要使用肾上腺素(1.4%)。在第一年的维持阶段,没有患者因误食花生而就诊,也不需要肾上腺素:我们的研究结果表明,在基层医疗机构对花生过敏进行早期口服免疫疗法似乎是安全的,而且不会增加急诊就诊负担。我们的患者坚持治疗的比例很高,大多数人都能达到维持剂量并坚持一年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of probiotics as adjuvant therapy in bronchial asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zéro allergie research clinic: a clinical and research initiative in oral immunotherapy for managing IgE-mediated food allergy. A case report of fatal anaphylaxis on first exposure to rasburicase just before lymphoma treatment. Eosinophil count testing in patients with asthma varies by healthcare provider type in the US: a retrospective study. Safety and adherence of early oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy in a primary care setting: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1