Carboxytherapy versus its Combination with Fractional CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Striae Distensae: An Objective, Right-to-left, Comparative Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Moetaz El-Domyati, Wael Hosam El-Din, Walid Medhat, Yasmin Khaled, Michel R Ibrahim
{"title":"Carboxytherapy versus its Combination with Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser for the Treatment of Striae Distensae: An Objective, Right-to-left, Comparative Study.","authors":"Moetaz El-Domyati, Wael Hosam El-Din, Walid Medhat, Yasmin Khaled, Michel R Ibrahim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Striae distensae (SD) is a common cutaneous disorder which appears as linear lesions seen mainly in women. Since previously described in 1889, SD has presented a significant challenge regarding its evaluation and treatment. Carboxytherapy was recently reported as an effective treatment for SD.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to objectively compare the clinical effectiveness of carbon dioxide therapy (CDT) as monotherapy versus a combination of CDT and fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser in the treatment of SD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study included twenty cases with bilateral and symmetrical SD. Each patient was treated with CDT only on the right (Rt) side of the body, while the left (Lt) side received a combination of CDT and fractional C0<sub>2</sub> laser.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical evaluation revealed a clearly significant clinical improvement in SD lesions after both techniques regarding length, width, texture, and pigment changes. Although the Lt side showed slightly better improvement, however no statistically significant difference could be observed between both sides. In the meantime, the objective improvement observed by the 3D camera and histometric analysis correlated with the clinical improvement. Special stains showed collagen deposition which became more compact, dense and better organized, accompanied by evident increase in elastic fibers in a normal linear microfibrillar pattern after treatment on both sides.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CDT demonstrated efficacy and safety as a minimally invasive modality for management of SD, as it induces collagen remodeling and better organization of elastic fibers with minimal side effects and downtime.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"17 10","pages":"E69-E75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Striae distensae (SD) is a common cutaneous disorder which appears as linear lesions seen mainly in women. Since previously described in 1889, SD has presented a significant challenge regarding its evaluation and treatment. Carboxytherapy was recently reported as an effective treatment for SD.

Objectives: We sought to objectively compare the clinical effectiveness of carbon dioxide therapy (CDT) as monotherapy versus a combination of CDT and fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of SD.

Methods: This randomized prospective study included twenty cases with bilateral and symmetrical SD. Each patient was treated with CDT only on the right (Rt) side of the body, while the left (Lt) side received a combination of CDT and fractional C02 laser.

Results: Clinical evaluation revealed a clearly significant clinical improvement in SD lesions after both techniques regarding length, width, texture, and pigment changes. Although the Lt side showed slightly better improvement, however no statistically significant difference could be observed between both sides. In the meantime, the objective improvement observed by the 3D camera and histometric analysis correlated with the clinical improvement. Special stains showed collagen deposition which became more compact, dense and better organized, accompanied by evident increase in elastic fibers in a normal linear microfibrillar pattern after treatment on both sides.

Conclusion: CDT demonstrated efficacy and safety as a minimally invasive modality for management of SD, as it induces collagen remodeling and better organization of elastic fibers with minimal side effects and downtime.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳氧治疗与二氧化碳点阵激光联合治疗茎突条纹:一项客观、从右到左的比较研究。
背景:远端条纹(Striae distensae,SD)是一种常见的皮肤疾病,主要表现为女性的线状皮损。自 1889 年被描述以来,SD 在评估和治疗方面一直是一个重大挑战。最近有报道称,羧基疗法是治疗 SD 的一种有效方法:我们试图客观比较二氧化碳疗法(CDT)作为单一疗法与 CDT 和点阵 CO2 激光联合疗法治疗 SD 的临床疗效:这项随机前瞻性研究包括20例双侧对称性SD患者。方法:这项随机前瞻性研究纳入了 20 例双侧对称性 SD 患者,每位患者仅在右侧接受 CDT 治疗,而左侧则接受 CDT 和点阵二氧化碳激光联合治疗:临床评估显示,两种技术治疗后,SD 病变在长度、宽度、质地和色素变化方面均有明显改善。虽然 Lt 一侧的改善效果稍好,但在统计学上,两侧的差异并不明显。同时,三维照相机和组织计量分析所观察到的客观改善与临床改善相关。特殊染色显示,两侧治疗后,胶原蛋白沉积变得更加紧密、致密和有序,弹性纤维明显增加,呈正常的线性微纤维模式:CDT 作为一种治疗 SD 的微创方法,在诱导胶原重塑和改善弹力纤维组织的同时,将副作用和停工期降到最低,因此具有很高的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊最新文献
An Innovative Antidote to Burnout. Carboxytherapy versus its Combination with Fractional CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Striae Distensae: An Objective, Right-to-left, Comparative Study. Diagnosis of Vascular Anomalies in Patients with Skin of Color. Diagnostic Delay of Psoriatic Arthritis of More Than Six Months Contributes to Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Depression, Social Ability, and Disease Impact: A Cross-sectional Study. Disparities in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1