Disparities in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-01
Miguel A Aristizabal, Daniel Zieman, Hannah S Berman, Kyle A Williams, Dane J Markham, Michael G Heckman, Alex Hochwald, Naiara S Barbosa, Catherine Degesys
{"title":"Disparities in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.","authors":"Miguel A Aristizabal, Daniel Zieman, Hannah S Berman, Kyle A Williams, Dane J Markham, Michael G Heckman, Alex Hochwald, Naiara S Barbosa, Catherine Degesys","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to examine possible differences in BCC characteristics and treatment patterns between two matched cohorts of Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single institution, retrospective matched cohort study, data from patients with biopsy proven BCC from June 2005 to May 2022 was collected. Demographic, BCC, and treatment characteristics were compared between Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, for continuous and ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test, for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 604 individuals with a diagnosis of biopsy-proven BCC were matched in a 1:1 fashion by age (± 0 years) and sex, based on self-identified ethnicity as Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Since all patients self-identified as White race, the two cohorts were labeled Hispanic White (n=302) and non-Hispanic White (n=302). The most frequent location for BCC was in the H area, 129 [42.7%] White Hispanic group vs 132 [43.7%] White non-Hispanic group (p = 0.87). In both Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White groups, the predominant subtype of BCC was the nodular (149 [50.2%] vs 164 [54.7%], p = 0.25). The median BCC pre-operative size in the Hispanic White group was 0.9 cm, whereas in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.0 cm (p = 0.004). Furthermore, the MMS defect size in the Hispanic White group had a median of 1.3 cm, while in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.6 cm (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, single-center study, and self-reported race and ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both groups had similar demographics, tumor features, treatments, and post-operative complications. Notably, preoperative lesion and MMS defect sizes were larger in non-Hispanic Whites than in Hispanic Whites, contrary to expectations. Despite assumptions of poorer skin cancer outcomes among Hispanics, our findings indicate increased sizes in non-Hispanic Whites. Given the diversity in genetics and clinical traits within ethnicities, especially Hispanics, more research is needed for precise insights into disease outcomes across diverse backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":53616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","volume":"17 10","pages":"24-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We sought to examine possible differences in BCC characteristics and treatment patterns between two matched cohorts of Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals.

Methods: In this single institution, retrospective matched cohort study, data from patients with biopsy proven BCC from June 2005 to May 2022 was collected. Demographic, BCC, and treatment characteristics were compared between Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, for continuous and ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test, for categorical variables.

Results: A total of 604 individuals with a diagnosis of biopsy-proven BCC were matched in a 1:1 fashion by age (± 0 years) and sex, based on self-identified ethnicity as Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Since all patients self-identified as White race, the two cohorts were labeled Hispanic White (n=302) and non-Hispanic White (n=302). The most frequent location for BCC was in the H area, 129 [42.7%] White Hispanic group vs 132 [43.7%] White non-Hispanic group (p = 0.87). In both Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White groups, the predominant subtype of BCC was the nodular (149 [50.2%] vs 164 [54.7%], p = 0.25). The median BCC pre-operative size in the Hispanic White group was 0.9 cm, whereas in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.0 cm (p = 0.004). Furthermore, the MMS defect size in the Hispanic White group had a median of 1.3 cm, while in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.6 cm (p < 0.001).

Limitations: Retrospective design, single-center study, and self-reported race and ethnicity.

Conclusion: Both groups had similar demographics, tumor features, treatments, and post-operative complications. Notably, preoperative lesion and MMS defect sizes were larger in non-Hispanic Whites than in Hispanic Whites, contrary to expectations. Despite assumptions of poorer skin cancer outcomes among Hispanics, our findings indicate increased sizes in non-Hispanic Whites. Given the diversity in genetics and clinical traits within ethnicities, especially Hispanics, more research is needed for precise insights into disease outcomes across diverse backgrounds.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基底细胞癌的差异:西班牙裔和非西班牙裔白人的比较分析。
目的我们试图研究西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔白人两个匹配队列在 BCC 特征和治疗模式上可能存在的差异:在这项单一机构的回顾性匹配队列研究中,我们收集了 2005 年 6 月至 2022 年 5 月期间经活检证实的 BCC 患者的数据。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔白人的人口统计学特征、BCC特征和治疗特征,并采用费雪精确检验比较分类变量:根据自我认同的西班牙裔或非西班牙裔种族,按年龄(± 0 岁)和性别以 1:1 的方式匹配了 604 名经活检确诊为 BCC 的患者。由于所有患者均自认为是白种人,因此这两组患者分别被称为西班牙裔白种人(302 人)和非西班牙裔白种人(302 人)。BCC 最常发生的部位是 H 区,西班牙裔白人组为 129 人[42.7%],非西班牙裔白人组为 132 人[43.7%](P = 0.87)。在西班牙裔白人组和非西班牙裔白人组中,BCC 的主要亚型是结节型(149 [50.2%] vs 164 [54.7%],p = 0.25)。西班牙裔白人组的术前 BCC 中位尺寸为 0.9 厘米,而非西班牙裔白人组为 1.0 厘米(P = 0.004)。此外,西班牙裔白人组的MMS缺损大小中位数为1.3厘米,而非西班牙裔白人组为1.6厘米(p < 0.001):局限性:回顾性设计、单中心研究、自报种族和族裔:两组患者的人口统计学、肿瘤特征、治疗方法和术后并发症相似。值得注意的是,非西班牙裔白人的术前皮损和MMS缺损面积大于西班牙裔白人,这与预期相反。尽管假设西班牙裔白人的皮肤癌预后较差,但我们的研究结果表明,非西班牙裔白人的皮肤癌面积增大。鉴于不同种族(尤其是西班牙裔)在遗传学和临床特征方面的多样性,我们需要开展更多的研究,以准确了解不同背景下的疾病预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
期刊最新文献
An Innovative Antidote to Burnout. Carboxytherapy versus its Combination with Fractional CO2 Laser for the Treatment of Striae Distensae: An Objective, Right-to-left, Comparative Study. Diagnosis of Vascular Anomalies in Patients with Skin of Color. Diagnostic Delay of Psoriatic Arthritis of More Than Six Months Contributes to Poor Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Depression, Social Ability, and Disease Impact: A Cross-sectional Study. Disparities in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1