Stent Underexpansion Is an Underestimated Cause of Intrastent Restenosis: Insights From RESTO Registry.

IF 5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Heart Association Pub Date : 2024-11-05 Epub Date: 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1161/JAHA.124.036065
Géraud Souteyrand, Thomas Mouyen, Benjamin Honton, Aurélien Mulliez, Benoit Lattuca, Jean-Guillaume Dilinger, Sébastien Levesque, Grégoire Range, Nicolas Combaret, Stéphanie Marliere, Ouarda Lamallem, Marine Quillot, Edouard Gerbaud, Pascal Motreff, Nicolas Amabile
{"title":"Stent Underexpansion Is an Underestimated Cause of Intrastent Restenosis: Insights From RESTO Registry.","authors":"Géraud Souteyrand, Thomas Mouyen, Benjamin Honton, Aurélien Mulliez, Benoit Lattuca, Jean-Guillaume Dilinger, Sébastien Levesque, Grégoire Range, Nicolas Combaret, Stéphanie Marliere, Ouarda Lamallem, Marine Quillot, Edouard Gerbaud, Pascal Motreff, Nicolas Amabile","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.124.036065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite improvement in devices, in-stent restenosis remains a frequent and challenging complication of percutaneous coronary interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The RESTO (Morphological Parameters of In-Stent Restenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT [Optical Coherence Tomography]; study NCT04268875) was a prospective multicenter registry including patients presenting with coronary syndromes related to in-stent restenosis. All patients underwent preintervention OCT analysis, which led to analysis of in-stent restenosis phenotype, number of strut layers, and presence of stent underexpansion. The primary end point was the in-stent restenosis type according to the OCT morphological classification. The 1-year incidence of target vessel failure (a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) was assessed. The study included 297 patients. The culprit stent was a drug-eluting stent in 74.2% of cases. OCT analysis revealed the presence of neoatherosclerosis in 57% (52% calcified), neointimal hyperplasia in 43% (58% homogeneous), stent underexpansion (minimal stent area <4.5 mm<sup>2</sup>) in 43%, and multiple stent layers in 30%. The prepercutaneous coronary intervention OCT analysis modified the operator's strategy for management in 30% of cases. Treatment involved drug-eluting stent implantation in 61.6% and drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in 36.1% of cases with only 63.2% optimal results. The 1-year target vessel failure incidence was 11% (95% CI, 9%-13%). Residual postpercutaneous coronary intervention stent underexpansion was associated with significantly higher target vessel failure incidence (19% [95% CI, 14%-24%] versus 7% [95% CI, 5-9], <i>P</i>=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OCT identified neoatherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia in comparable proportions. Stent underexpansion was frequent and favored subsequent adverse clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54370,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":" ","pages":"e036065"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.036065","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite improvement in devices, in-stent restenosis remains a frequent and challenging complication of percutaneous coronary interventions.

Methods and results: The RESTO (Morphological Parameters of In-Stent Restenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT [Optical Coherence Tomography]; study NCT04268875) was a prospective multicenter registry including patients presenting with coronary syndromes related to in-stent restenosis. All patients underwent preintervention OCT analysis, which led to analysis of in-stent restenosis phenotype, number of strut layers, and presence of stent underexpansion. The primary end point was the in-stent restenosis type according to the OCT morphological classification. The 1-year incidence of target vessel failure (a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) was assessed. The study included 297 patients. The culprit stent was a drug-eluting stent in 74.2% of cases. OCT analysis revealed the presence of neoatherosclerosis in 57% (52% calcified), neointimal hyperplasia in 43% (58% homogeneous), stent underexpansion (minimal stent area <4.5 mm2) in 43%, and multiple stent layers in 30%. The prepercutaneous coronary intervention OCT analysis modified the operator's strategy for management in 30% of cases. Treatment involved drug-eluting stent implantation in 61.6% and drug-eluting balloon angioplasty in 36.1% of cases with only 63.2% optimal results. The 1-year target vessel failure incidence was 11% (95% CI, 9%-13%). Residual postpercutaneous coronary intervention stent underexpansion was associated with significantly higher target vessel failure incidence (19% [95% CI, 14%-24%] versus 7% [95% CI, 5-9], P=0.01).

Conclusions: OCT identified neoatherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia in comparable proportions. Stent underexpansion was frequent and favored subsequent adverse clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支架扩张不足是造成支架内再狭窄的低估原因:RESTO 登记的启示。
背景:尽管设备有所改进,但支架内再狭窄仍是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中一种常见且具有挑战性的并发症:RESTO(通过 OCT [光学相干断层扫描] 评估和识别支架内再狭窄的形态参数;研究 NCT04268875)是一项前瞻性多中心登记项目,包括与支架内再狭窄相关的冠状动脉综合征患者。所有患者都接受了干预前的 OCT 分析,分析结果包括支架内再狭窄表型、支架层数和是否存在支架扩张不足。主要终点是根据 OCT 形态学分类得出的支架内再狭窄类型。研究还评估了靶血管衰竭(心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建的综合结果)的1年发生率。研究共纳入 297 名患者。74.2%的病例的罪魁祸首是药物洗脱支架。OCT分析显示,57%的患者存在新动脉硬化(52%为钙化),43%的患者存在新血管内膜增生(58%为均质性),43%的患者存在支架扩张不足(最小支架面积为2),30%的患者存在多层支架。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前的 OCT 分析改变了 30% 病例操作者的治疗策略。61.6%的患者接受了药物洗脱支架植入治疗,36.1%的患者接受了药物洗脱球囊血管成形术,只有63.2%的患者获得了最佳治疗效果。1年靶血管失败发生率为11%(95% CI,9%-13%)。经皮冠状动脉介入术后残余支架扩张不足与较高的靶血管失败发生率相关(19% [95% CI, 14%-24%] 对 7% [95% CI, 5-9], P=0.01):OCT发现新动脉硬化和新内膜增生的比例相当。支架扩张不足的情况很常见,并有利于随后的不良临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Heart Association
Journal of the American Heart Association CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
1749
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: As an Open Access journal, JAHA - Journal of the American Heart Association is rapidly and freely available, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice. JAHA is an authoritative, peer-reviewed Open Access journal focusing on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. JAHA provides a global forum for basic and clinical research and timely reviews on cardiovascular disease and stroke. As an Open Access journal, its content is free on publication to read, download, and share, accelerating the translation of strong science into effective practice.
期刊最新文献
Novel Adiposity Indices Are Associated With Poor Prognosis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Without the Obesity Paradox. Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outcomes After a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Capable Facility Opening by Patient Race and Community Segregation. Work-Related Stress Is Associated With Unfavorable Cardiovascular Health: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. JAHA at Scientific Sessions 2023: Moving Toward Social Justice in Cardiovascular Health in the United States. Association Between Direct Oral Anticoagulant Score and Bleeding Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1