Brice N Vofo, Ayala Katzir, Mohammad Homiedat, Antonio Rivera, Fernando Estrella, Samer Khateb, Tareq Jaouni
{"title":"Role of Visual Evoked Potential and Ocular Trauma Score as Predictors of Visual Recovery in Eye Globe Injuries.","authors":"Brice N Vofo, Ayala Katzir, Mohammad Homiedat, Antonio Rivera, Fernando Estrella, Samer Khateb, Tareq Jaouni","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluate visual evoked potential (VEP) and ocular trauma score (OTS) efficacy in predicting visual potential in globe trauma without optic nerve involvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from eye globe injury cases undergoing flash VEP between January 2000 and May 2021. Inclusion criteria: flash VEP completion within 48 hours, pre-surgical intervention. Exclusions: head trauma, optic nerve injuries. Abnormal VEP: <7 µV amplitudes, >120ms latencies. The OTS was computed, and penetrating injuries were categorized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 85 eyes meeting the criteria (mean age: 31.9±20.6 years, 82.4% male), the median follow-up was 22 months. OTS directly correlated with the amount of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters gained at follow-up and was inversely correlated with ocular penetration extent, and VEP signal amplitude. VEP amplitude is inversely correlated with maintaining/improving visual acuity. Positive predictive value for normal VEP predicting maintained/improved visual acuity: 75.6%, negative predictive value: 21.3%. In blunt trauma, baseline VEP amplitude had superior predictive value compared to penetrating injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a correlation between VEP signal amplitude and OTS with visual outcomes in traumatic eye injuries without optic nerve involvement. OTS emerges as a reliable VEP substitute, particularly in blunt trauma cases, where baseline VEP amplitude predicts visual recovery more accurately than penetrating injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluate visual evoked potential (VEP) and ocular trauma score (OTS) efficacy in predicting visual potential in globe trauma without optic nerve involvement.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from eye globe injury cases undergoing flash VEP between January 2000 and May 2021. Inclusion criteria: flash VEP completion within 48 hours, pre-surgical intervention. Exclusions: head trauma, optic nerve injuries. Abnormal VEP: <7 µV amplitudes, >120ms latencies. The OTS was computed, and penetrating injuries were categorized.
Results: Of 85 eyes meeting the criteria (mean age: 31.9±20.6 years, 82.4% male), the median follow-up was 22 months. OTS directly correlated with the amount of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters gained at follow-up and was inversely correlated with ocular penetration extent, and VEP signal amplitude. VEP amplitude is inversely correlated with maintaining/improving visual acuity. Positive predictive value for normal VEP predicting maintained/improved visual acuity: 75.6%, negative predictive value: 21.3%. In blunt trauma, baseline VEP amplitude had superior predictive value compared to penetrating injury.
Conclusion: This study highlights a correlation between VEP signal amplitude and OTS with visual outcomes in traumatic eye injuries without optic nerve involvement. OTS emerges as a reliable VEP substitute, particularly in blunt trauma cases, where baseline VEP amplitude predicts visual recovery more accurately than penetrating injuries.