Development of nursing students' professional identity in different mentoring approaches during clinical training: A quasi-experimental study

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106459
Ivana Gusar , Andrea Tokić , Robert Lovrić
{"title":"Development of nursing students' professional identity in different mentoring approaches during clinical training: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Ivana Gusar ,&nbsp;Andrea Tokić ,&nbsp;Robert Lovrić","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The professional identity (PI) of nursing students' is essential for high quality performance and safe healthcare. Clinical training plays a key role in the development of professional identity during nursing studies.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of individual and group mentoring approaches on the development of PI during clinical training, as well as the influence of the order in which these approaches are applied, and the effect of time on the development of PI.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This study used a quasi-experimental design.</div></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><div>The study was conducted at the Department of Health Studies in Croatia.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The 119 first, second, and third year ungraduate nursing students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Students were divided into two groups. Each group performed clinical training in group and individual mentoring approaches, but in different order. The Professional Identity Five Factor Scale (PIFFS) was used to measure PI levels at four different time points: immediately before and after the first and second rounds of clinical exercises.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Both groups of students, achieved approximately average results in all three dimensions of the PI. There was no statistically significant main effect of the group/individual mentoring approach on the dimensions of knowledge (P = 0.471), experience (P = 0.865) or perception of role model and professional future (P = 0.565). The levels of the dimensions knowledge (P = 0.001), experience (P = 0.001) or perception of the role model and professional future (P = 0.002) differed in four measurement points, which indicates a general increase in all three PI dimensions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>During the performance of the clinical training, the level of PI increased. The group mentoring approach has an immediate effect on increasing knowledge, but this effect diminishes over time. In terms of experience, both mentoring approaches have similar reinforcing effects. However, the individual approach seems to be more suitable for improving the perception of role models and the professional future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 106459"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724003691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The professional identity (PI) of nursing students' is essential for high quality performance and safe healthcare. Clinical training plays a key role in the development of professional identity during nursing studies.

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of individual and group mentoring approaches on the development of PI during clinical training, as well as the influence of the order in which these approaches are applied, and the effect of time on the development of PI.

Design

This study used a quasi-experimental design.

Settings

The study was conducted at the Department of Health Studies in Croatia.

Participants

The 119 first, second, and third year ungraduate nursing students.

Methods

Students were divided into two groups. Each group performed clinical training in group and individual mentoring approaches, but in different order. The Professional Identity Five Factor Scale (PIFFS) was used to measure PI levels at four different time points: immediately before and after the first and second rounds of clinical exercises.

Results

Both groups of students, achieved approximately average results in all three dimensions of the PI. There was no statistically significant main effect of the group/individual mentoring approach on the dimensions of knowledge (P = 0.471), experience (P = 0.865) or perception of role model and professional future (P = 0.565). The levels of the dimensions knowledge (P = 0.001), experience (P = 0.001) or perception of the role model and professional future (P = 0.002) differed in four measurement points, which indicates a general increase in all three PI dimensions.

Conclusions

During the performance of the clinical training, the level of PI increased. The group mentoring approach has an immediate effect on increasing knowledge, but this effect diminishes over time. In terms of experience, both mentoring approaches have similar reinforcing effects. However, the individual approach seems to be more suitable for improving the perception of role models and the professional future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床培训期间不同指导方法下护生专业认同感的发展:一项准实验研究。
背景:护理专业学生的专业认同(PI)对于高质量的工作表现和安全的医疗保健至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨临床培训期间个人和小组指导方法对专业认同感发展的影响,以及这些方法的应用顺序和时间对专业认同感发展的影响:本研究采用准实验设计:研究在克罗地亚健康研究系进行:119名一、二、三年级的护理本科生:方法:学生分为两组。方法:学生被分为两组,每组以小组和个人指导方式进行临床培训,但顺序不同。使用职业认同五因素量表(PIFFS)在四个不同的时间点测量职业认同水平:第一轮和第二轮临床实践前后:两组学生在职业认同的三个维度上都取得了大致平均的结果。在知识(P = 0.471)、经验(P = 0.865)或对榜样和职业未来的看法(P = 0.565)三个维度上,小组/个人指导方法没有统计学意义上的主效应。知识(P = 0.001)、经验(P = 0.001)或对榜样和职业未来的看法(P = 0.002)这三个维度的水平在四个测量点上存在差异,这表明所有三个 PI 维度的水平普遍提高:结论:在临床培训期间,PI 水平有所提高。小组指导方法对增加知识有立竿见影的效果,但这种效果会随着时间的推移而减弱。就经验而言,两种指导方法的强化效果相似。不过,个人指导方法似乎更适合提高对榜样和职业未来的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Clinical training challenges in critical care units for nursing students: A qualitative content analysis. Treatment fidelity in nursing education research: Striking a balance between rigor and real-world relevance as a contemporary challenge. Metaverse in healthcare education: A scoping review of definitions and challenges. Reorienting nursing education toward a culture of self-care: Nursing students' experiences of nurse self-care integration-A qualitative systematic review. AI literacy, information cocoons, and creativity in healthcare postgraduate education: A latent profile and mediation analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1