Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the perceived personal control questionnaire as an outcome measure instrument for genetic counseling.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1989
Camille Raîche, Julie Lapointe, Célia Villafane-Bernier, Jocelyne Chiquette, Karine Bouchard, Sylvie Pelletier, Arian Omeranovic, Philippe Fortier, Claire Brousseau, Sophie Lauzier, Johanne Hébert, Michel Dorval, Hermann Nabi
{"title":"Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the perceived personal control questionnaire as an outcome measure instrument for genetic counseling.","authors":"Camille Raîche, Julie Lapointe, Célia Villafane-Bernier, Jocelyne Chiquette, Karine Bouchard, Sylvie Pelletier, Arian Omeranovic, Philippe Fortier, Claire Brousseau, Sophie Lauzier, Johanne Hébert, Michel Dorval, Hermann Nabi","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire serves as an instrument to assess the concept of PPC, which refers to a person's perception of their ability to achieve positive outcomes while avoiding the negative effects of a given situation. Developed and used as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in genetic counseling, the PPC questionnaire has been translated and validated in several languages, but not in French. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate a French version of the PPC questionnaire to evaluate genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). After the translation into French, cognitive interviews were conducted with nine participants who had attended genetic counseling for HBOC to examine the adequacy of this French version and to verify participants' understanding of the questionnaire items. Cognitive interview data suggested that slight modifications should be made to four of the nine items and that it would be beneficial to add a short introduction to ensure that participants' interpretation corresponded to the intended meaning. Psychometric validation was then conducted with 99 participants who had also attended genetic counseling for HBOC. Counselees completed the questionnaire before and after their genetic consultation. The acceptability of the questionnaire was demonstrated by the presence of few missing items. The original three-factor solution was not confirmed by our exploratory factor analysis, suggesting that the questionnaire should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was high, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 before genetic counseling and 0.88 after. The significant increase in PPC scores before and after genetic counseling supports the responsiveness of the questionnaire. Convergent validity was confirmed by positive association with counselees' satisfaction with genetic counseling. These properties suggest the French PPC questionnaire is a valuable instrument for use as a PROM in genetic counseling research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1989","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire serves as an instrument to assess the concept of PPC, which refers to a person's perception of their ability to achieve positive outcomes while avoiding the negative effects of a given situation. Developed and used as a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in genetic counseling, the PPC questionnaire has been translated and validated in several languages, but not in French. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt and validate a French version of the PPC questionnaire to evaluate genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). After the translation into French, cognitive interviews were conducted with nine participants who had attended genetic counseling for HBOC to examine the adequacy of this French version and to verify participants' understanding of the questionnaire items. Cognitive interview data suggested that slight modifications should be made to four of the nine items and that it would be beneficial to add a short introduction to ensure that participants' interpretation corresponded to the intended meaning. Psychometric validation was then conducted with 99 participants who had also attended genetic counseling for HBOC. Counselees completed the questionnaire before and after their genetic consultation. The acceptability of the questionnaire was demonstrated by the presence of few missing items. The original three-factor solution was not confirmed by our exploratory factor analysis, suggesting that the questionnaire should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was high, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 before genetic counseling and 0.88 after. The significant increase in PPC scores before and after genetic counseling supports the responsiveness of the questionnaire. Convergent validity was confirmed by positive association with counselees' satisfaction with genetic counseling. These properties suggest the French PPC questionnaire is a valuable instrument for use as a PROM in genetic counseling research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为遗传咨询结果测量工具的个人控制感知问卷法文版的跨文化改编和验证。
个人控制感知(PPC)问卷是评估个人控制感知概念的工具,个人控制感知概念是指一个人对自己在避免特定情况的负面影响的同时获得积极结果的能力的感知。作为遗传咨询中的患者报告结果测量(PROM),PPC 问卷已被翻译成多种语言并通过验证,但尚未翻译成法语。本研究旨在对法文版 PPC 问卷进行跨文化改编和验证,以评估遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)的遗传咨询服务。在将问卷翻译成法文后,我们对参加过遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询服务的九名参与者进行了认知访谈,以检查该法文版问卷的适当性,并验证参与者对问卷项目的理解。认知访谈数据表明,应对 9 个项目中的 4 个稍作修改,并添加简短的介绍,以确保参与者的解释与预期含义相符。随后,对 99 名参加过 HBOC 遗传咨询的参与者进行了心理计量验证。咨询者在接受遗传咨询前后填写了问卷。问卷的可接受性体现在几乎没有缺失项目。我们的探索性因素分析没有证实最初的三因素解决方案,这表明问卷应作为一维工具使用。问卷的内部一致性很高,遗传咨询前的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.89,遗传咨询后的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.88。遗传咨询前后 PPC 分数的大幅提高证明了问卷的响应性。问卷与咨询者对遗传咨询的满意度呈正相关,证实了问卷的收敛有效性。这些特性表明,法国的 PPC 问卷是遗传咨询研究中一种有价值的 PROM 工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
Navigating sexual orientation and gender identity data privacy concerns in United States genetics practices Revision request to the standardized pedigree nomenclature regarding surrogacy versus gestational carriers and suggestion for new nomenclature pertaining to embryo adoption Genetic testing for children at risk to be hemophilia carriers Issue Information A heartfelt thank you to the 2024 Journal of Genetic Counseling reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1