Heel Warming in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Newborns for Capillary Blood Sampling.

Joke Maria Wielenga, April Pascual, Kiki Ruhe, Christ Jan van Ganzewinkel
{"title":"Heel Warming in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Newborns for Capillary Blood Sampling.","authors":"Joke Maria Wielenga, April Pascual, Kiki Ruhe, Christ Jan van Ganzewinkel","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if performing heel stick procedures for capillary blood sampling without prior heel warming is noninferior to the standard practice of warming the heel in very-low-birth-weight newborns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Noninferiority randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place in two Level 3 NICUs in The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Newborns born at less than 32 weeks gestation in their second or third week of life without an arterial line in situ or known coagulopathy (N = 100).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomized participants to undergo a heel stick procedure in one of two groups: without heel warming (n = 50) and heel warming with a washcloth warmed with 37 °C tap water (n = 25) or with a microwaved hot pack (n = 25). The primary outcome was length of time for obtaining the required blood sample. The secondary outcomes were number of attempts, reliability of the blood sample, newborn comfort, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed no differences in background characteristics between groups and found no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in primary or secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among participants, not warming the heel before a heel stick was noninferior to warming the heel. Therefore, preheating the heel as a standard of care may be an unnecessary nursing intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if performing heel stick procedures for capillary blood sampling without prior heel warming is noninferior to the standard practice of warming the heel in very-low-birth-weight newborns.

Design: Noninferiority randomized control trial.

Setting: The study took place in two Level 3 NICUs in The Netherlands.

Participants: Newborns born at less than 32 weeks gestation in their second or third week of life without an arterial line in situ or known coagulopathy (N = 100).

Methods: We randomized participants to undergo a heel stick procedure in one of two groups: without heel warming (n = 50) and heel warming with a washcloth warmed with 37 °C tap water (n = 25) or with a microwaved hot pack (n = 25). The primary outcome was length of time for obtaining the required blood sample. The secondary outcomes were number of attempts, reliability of the blood sample, newborn comfort, and adverse events.

Results: We observed no differences in background characteristics between groups and found no statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in primary or secondary outcomes.

Conclusion: Among participants, not warming the heel before a heel stick was noninferior to warming the heel. Therefore, preheating the heel as a standard of care may be an unnecessary nursing intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为极低出生体重新生儿取毛细血管血样时进行足跟热敷
目的确定在对极低出生体重新生儿进行毛细血管血液采样时,如果不事先热敷足跟,进行足跟扎针是否不逊于热敷足跟的标准做法:非劣效性随机对照试验:研究在荷兰的两所三级新生儿重症监护室进行:妊娠不足 32 周出生的新生儿,出生后第二周或第三周没有动脉导管或已知有凝血功能障碍(N = 100):我们将参与者随机分为两组,一组接受足跟粘贴术,一组不进行足跟加温(50 人),另一组使用用 37 °C 自来水加温的毛巾进行足跟加温(25 人)或使用微波热敷包进行足跟加温(25 人)。主要结果是获得所需血液样本的时间长度。次要结果是尝试次数、血样的可靠性、新生儿舒适度和不良事件:结果:我们观察到各组之间的背景特征没有差异,在主要或次要结果中也没有发现具有统计学意义或临床相关性的差异:结论:在参与者中,足跟棒前不预热足跟与预热足跟相比并无差别。因此,将预热足跟作为护理标准可能是不必要的护理干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Women in Opioid Recovery Regarding Policies and Laws on Sexual and Reproductive Health. Relationships Among Endorsement of the Superwoman Schema and Health Outcomes. Associations Among Lifetime Discrimination Typologies and Psychological Health in Black and Hispanic Women After Birth. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1