RSV prevention options for infants and older adults: A specific expanding competitive arena

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105187
Livio Garattini , Antonio Clavenna
{"title":"RSV prevention options for infants and older adults: A specific expanding competitive arena","authors":"Livio Garattini ,&nbsp;Antonio Clavenna","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is an ubiquitous respiratory virus, which spreads like seasonal influenza throughout winter time in temperate climate countries. RSV infections are usually mild in healthy children and adults, but may be severe in premature infants, young children with congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease, immunocompromised individuals and frail elderly people.</div><div>At present, the pharmaceutical options to prevent RSV negative effects can be divided into monoclonal antibodies (mABs) and vaccines (active immunization). The two mABs licensed so far are indicated only for infants, while the first vaccines approved are mainly recommended for older adults.</div><div>The pharmaceutical competitive arena of products to prevent RSV negative effects has recently become very crowded after more than two decades with only one mAB as the unique option. Here, we try to put order in the dramatically increasing mix of very different products which have been recently launched. The aim of our effort is to provide some suggestions for European policy makers in order to limit the potentially relevant financial impact of these new expensive options on public pharmaceutical expenditures. We hope the suggested strategies might help to avoid transforming RSV from an apparently underscored health issue into a clearly overestimated health risk for the whole population in European countries. This dramatic change could be driven by a bunch of powerful multinational companies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024001970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is an ubiquitous respiratory virus, which spreads like seasonal influenza throughout winter time in temperate climate countries. RSV infections are usually mild in healthy children and adults, but may be severe in premature infants, young children with congenital heart disease or chronic lung disease, immunocompromised individuals and frail elderly people.
At present, the pharmaceutical options to prevent RSV negative effects can be divided into monoclonal antibodies (mABs) and vaccines (active immunization). The two mABs licensed so far are indicated only for infants, while the first vaccines approved are mainly recommended for older adults.
The pharmaceutical competitive arena of products to prevent RSV negative effects has recently become very crowded after more than two decades with only one mAB as the unique option. Here, we try to put order in the dramatically increasing mix of very different products which have been recently launched. The aim of our effort is to provide some suggestions for European policy makers in order to limit the potentially relevant financial impact of these new expensive options on public pharmaceutical expenditures. We hope the suggested strategies might help to avoid transforming RSV from an apparently underscored health issue into a clearly overestimated health risk for the whole population in European countries. This dramatic change could be driven by a bunch of powerful multinational companies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
婴儿和老年人 RSV 预防方案:不断扩大的特定竞争领域。
呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是一种无处不在的呼吸道病毒,它像季节性流感一样在温带气候国家的整个冬季传播。健康儿童和成人感染 RSV 后病情通常较轻,但早产儿、患有先天性心脏病或慢性肺病的幼儿、免疫力低下者和体弱老人感染 RSV 后病情可能会很严重。目前,预防 RSV 负面影响的药物可分为单克隆抗体(mABs)和疫苗(主动免疫)。目前获得许可的两种 mABs 仅适用于婴儿,而首批获批的疫苗主要推荐用于老年人。在二十多年后的今天,预防 RSV 负面影响的药品竞争领域已变得非常拥挤,只有一种 mAB 可供选择。在此,我们试图为最近推出的、急剧增加的各种不同产品建立秩序。我们努力的目的是为欧洲政策制定者提供一些建议,以限制这些新的昂贵选择对公共医药支出可能产生的相关财务影响。我们希望所建议的策略能够有助于避免 RSV 从一个明显被忽视的健康问题转变为一个明显被高估的对欧洲国家全体人口的健康风险。这种巨大的变化可能是由一群强大的跨国公司推动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
期刊最新文献
How COVID-19 illness perceptions and individual shocks are associated with trust during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, France, Germany, and South Africa. Implementing integrated care infrastructure: A longitudinal study on the interplay of policies, interorganizational arrangements and interoperability in NHS England. Public contributions to R&D of medical innovations: A framework for analysis. What mechanisms lead to the endurance of health and social care integration? A multiple case study in Italy. The right to health for socioeconomically disadvantaged TB patients in South Korea: An AAAQ framework analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1