Semantic memory navigation in HIV: Conceptual associations and word selection patterns.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2417844
Carolina A Gattei, Franco J Ferrante, Bárbara Sampedro, Lucas Sterpin, Valeria Abusamra, Lorena Abusamra, Paola Andrea Cañataro, Adolfo M García
{"title":"Semantic memory navigation in HIV: Conceptual associations and word selection patterns.","authors":"Carolina A Gattei, Franco J Ferrante, Bárbara Sampedro, Lucas Sterpin, Valeria Abusamra, Lorena Abusamra, Paola Andrea Cañataro, Adolfo M García","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2417844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This proof-of-concept study aimed to characterize semantic memory profiles in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and mild neurocognitive impairment. <b>Method:</b> Using a semantic relatedness task, we explored conceptual association and word selection patterns in people living with HIV (PLWH; <i>n</i> = 50) relative to people living without HIV (<i>n</i> = 46). We also studied whether word selection patterns in the PLWH group were associated with working memory capacity, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. <b>Results:</b> While accuracy did not differ between groups, PLWH produced significantly longer responses than controls (<i>r</i> = .32), with fewer hypernyms (<i>d</i> = .47), more troponyms (<i>r</i> = .37), and words that were more frequent (<i>r</i> = .39) and had more phonological neighbors (<i>r</i> = .22). These patterns survived covariation with participants' cognitive status. None of these patterns correlated with measures of working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control or viral load (all correlation coefficients <i><</i> .36). <b>Conclusions:</b> Together, these results suggest that PLWH might use alternative word finding strategies during semantic memory navigation, irrespective of the severity of other cognitive symptoms. Such findings contribute to the characterization of cognitive deficits in HIV and to the search for novel markers of the condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2417844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This proof-of-concept study aimed to characterize semantic memory profiles in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and mild neurocognitive impairment. Method: Using a semantic relatedness task, we explored conceptual association and word selection patterns in people living with HIV (PLWH; n = 50) relative to people living without HIV (n = 46). We also studied whether word selection patterns in the PLWH group were associated with working memory capacity, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control. Results: While accuracy did not differ between groups, PLWH produced significantly longer responses than controls (r = .32), with fewer hypernyms (d = .47), more troponyms (r = .37), and words that were more frequent (r = .39) and had more phonological neighbors (r = .22). These patterns survived covariation with participants' cognitive status. None of these patterns correlated with measures of working memory, cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control or viral load (all correlation coefficients < .36). Conclusions: Together, these results suggest that PLWH might use alternative word finding strategies during semantic memory navigation, irrespective of the severity of other cognitive symptoms. Such findings contribute to the characterization of cognitive deficits in HIV and to the search for novel markers of the condition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾滋病病毒的语义记忆导航:概念关联和选词模式。
研究目的这项概念验证研究旨在描述人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者和轻度神经认知障碍患者的语义记忆特征。方法通过语义关联任务,我们探讨了艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH;n = 50)与非艾滋病病毒感染者(n = 46)的概念关联和词语选择模式。我们还研究了艾滋病病毒感染者群体的选词模式是否与工作记忆能力、认知灵活性和抑制控制有关。结果显示虽然各组之间的准确性没有差异,但 PLWH 群体的反应时间明显长于对照组(r = .32),超音词较少(d = .47),同义词较多(r = .37),单词频率较高(r = .39),音素邻近词较多(r = .22)。这些模式与参与者的认知状况存在共变关系。这些模式均与工作记忆、认知灵活性、抑制控制或病毒负荷的测量无关(相关系数均为 0.36)。结论总之,这些结果表明,无论其他认知症状的严重程度如何,PLWH 都可能在语义记忆导航过程中使用其他的找词策略。这些研究结果有助于确定艾滋病患者认知障碍的特征,并有助于寻找艾滋病的新标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Symptom validity indices for the Beck Depression Inventory-II: development and cross-validation in research and clinical samples. Development of a Symptom Validity Index for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Interpreting the direct- and derived-Trail Making Test scores in Argentinian children: regression-based norms, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and practice effects. Enhanced detection of suboptimal effort in psychoeducational assessments for dyslexia. Neuropsychological normative standards for late career physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1