L Lundborg, K Åberg, X Liu, M Norman, O Stephansson, K Pettersson, M Ekborn, S Cnattingius, M Ahlberg
{"title":"Midwifery Continuity of Care During Pregnancy, Birth, and the Postpartum Period: A Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"L Lundborg, K Åberg, X Liu, M Norman, O Stephansson, K Pettersson, M Ekborn, S Cnattingius, M Ahlberg","doi":"10.1111/birt.12875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pregnancy outcomes in a midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) model to standard midwifery care in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Public healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, Stockholm, Sweden.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women giving birth at Karolinska University Hospital site Huddinge in Stockholm between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on all births including MCoC and standard care, during the time period, were retrieved from the national Swedish Pregnancy Register. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain a matched set from the standard care group for every woman in the MCoC model. Based on the matched cohort, we estimated risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Interventions during labor, mode of birth, and preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard care, women in the MCoC model were more likely to give birth spontaneously (RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10) and less likely to have an elective cesarean on maternal request (RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The risk of preterm birth was also reduced in the MCoC group (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MCoC model was associated with fewer medical interventions and improved pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12875","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes in a midwifery continuity of care (MCoC) model to standard midwifery care in Sweden.
Design: Matched cohort study.
Setting: Public healthcare during pregnancy and childbirth, Stockholm, Sweden.
Population: Women giving birth at Karolinska University Hospital site Huddinge in Stockholm between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021.
Methods: Data on all births including MCoC and standard care, during the time period, were retrieved from the national Swedish Pregnancy Register. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain a matched set from the standard care group for every woman in the MCoC model. Based on the matched cohort, we estimated risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Main outcome measures: Interventions during labor, mode of birth, and preterm birth (< 37 gestational weeks).
Results: Compared with standard care, women in the MCoC model were more likely to give birth spontaneously (RR 1.06 95% CI 1.02-1.10) and less likely to have an elective cesarean on maternal request (RR 0.24 95% CI 0.11-0.51). The risk of preterm birth was also reduced in the MCoC group (RR 0.51 95% CI 0.32-0.82).
Conclusion: The MCoC model was associated with fewer medical interventions and improved pregnancy outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.