Parity Moderates the Socioeconomic Predictors of Birth Setting Choice.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/birt.12882
Ahoua Dembélé, Bethlehem Peters, Dmitry Tumin
{"title":"Parity Moderates the Socioeconomic Predictors of Birth Setting Choice.","authors":"Ahoua Dembélé, Bethlehem Peters, Dmitry Tumin","doi":"10.1111/birt.12882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increase in the number of people choosing community birth has raised interest in understanding the factors that influence birth setting choices. This study investigates how parity influences the association between maternal socioeconomic factors and choice of community versus hospital birth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 2009-2021 US birth certificate data to identify community births (planned home or birth center births), parity, and maternal characteristics, including Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program participation, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, body mass index (BMI), and age. Parity was interacted with each covariate in a multivariable logistic regression model of birth setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 26,526,010 eligible births, 58% were to multiparous mothers, with 1.9% occurring in a birth center or at home. For most maternal characteristics, associations with community birth were stronger in the multiparous group compared to the nulliparous group. For example, being married was associated with greater odds of community birth in both groups, but the strength of this association was greater within the multiparous group (odds ratio 4.00 vs. 1.94, interaction p < 0.001). The same pattern (stronger association with community birth in the multiparous group than in the primiparous group) was observed for race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and WIC participation, all of which were associated with lower odds of community birth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that parity significantly moderates associations between maternal socioeconomic characteristics and birth setting, implying studies of decision-making in this context should purposively stratify samples and analyses by parity.</p>","PeriodicalId":55350,"journal":{"name":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12882","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increase in the number of people choosing community birth has raised interest in understanding the factors that influence birth setting choices. This study investigates how parity influences the association between maternal socioeconomic factors and choice of community versus hospital birth.

Methods: We used 2009-2021 US birth certificate data to identify community births (planned home or birth center births), parity, and maternal characteristics, including Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program participation, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, body mass index (BMI), and age. Parity was interacted with each covariate in a multivariable logistic regression model of birth setting.

Results: Among 26,526,010 eligible births, 58% were to multiparous mothers, with 1.9% occurring in a birth center or at home. For most maternal characteristics, associations with community birth were stronger in the multiparous group compared to the nulliparous group. For example, being married was associated with greater odds of community birth in both groups, but the strength of this association was greater within the multiparous group (odds ratio 4.00 vs. 1.94, interaction p < 0.001). The same pattern (stronger association with community birth in the multiparous group than in the primiparous group) was observed for race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and WIC participation, all of which were associated with lower odds of community birth.

Conclusion: This study shows that parity significantly moderates associations between maternal socioeconomic characteristics and birth setting, implying studies of decision-making in this context should purposively stratify samples and analyses by parity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
均等调节生育环境选择的社会经济预测因素。
背景:随着选择社区分娩的人数增加,人们开始关注影响分娩环境选择的因素。本研究调查了准妈妈的社会经济因素与选择社区分娩还是医院分娩之间的关系:我们使用 2009-2021 年美国出生证明数据来识别社区分娩(计划内家庭分娩或分娩中心分娩)、奇偶性和产妇特征,包括妇女、婴儿和儿童 (WIC) 计划参与情况、种族、民族、教育程度、婚姻状况、体重指数 (BMI) 和年龄。在出生环境的多变量逻辑回归模型中,胎次与每个协变量相互影响:在 26,526,010 名符合条件的新生儿中,58% 的新生儿为多产妇,1.9% 的新生儿在分娩中心或家中分娩。就大多数产妇特征而言,多产妇组与社区分娩的相关性比无产妇组更强。例如,在两组中,已婚与社区分娩的几率都更大,但在多产妇组中,这种关联的强度更大(几率比 4.00 vs. 1.94,交互作用 p):本研究表明,准妈妈的社会经济特征与分娩环境之间的关联有明显的调节作用,这意味着在这种情况下进行的决策研究应根据准妈妈的情况有目的地对样本进行分层和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care
Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care is a multidisciplinary, refereed journal devoted to issues and practices in the care of childbearing women, infants, and families. It is written by and for professionals in maternal and neonatal health, nurses, midwives, physicians, public health workers, doulas, social scientists, childbirth educators, lactation counselors, epidemiologists, and other health caregivers and policymakers in perinatal care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A History of Cesarean Birth as a Risk Factor for Postpartum Hemorrhage Even After Successful Planned Vaginal Birth. Pregnant Women's Care Needs During Early Labor-A Scoping Review. Sociodemographic and Health-Related Risk Factors Associated With Planned and Emergency Cesarean Births in Mexico. Validating the Quality Maternal and Newborn Care Framework Index: A Global Tool for Quality-of-Care Evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1