A Nationwide, Population-based Study of Intelligence and Hearing Loss Among 3,104,851 Adolescents.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology and Neuro-Otology Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1159/000542157
Nir Tsur, Yonatan Reuven, Mor Rittblat, Shlomi Abuhasira, Andrei Lubarski, Ohad Hilly, Zivan Beer
{"title":"A Nationwide, Population-based Study of Intelligence and Hearing Loss Among 3,104,851 Adolescents.","authors":"Nir Tsur, Yonatan Reuven, Mor Rittblat, Shlomi Abuhasira, Andrei Lubarski, Ohad Hilly, Zivan Beer","doi":"10.1159/000542157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a relationship between general intelligence (GI) in youth and hearing loss (HL). However, no large-scale study assessed the relations of GI in late adolescence with conductive HL and sensorineural HL, stratified by severity. This study examined the connection between HL and GI in late adolescence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study on mandatory pre-military recruitment data recorded during 1967-2019 of patients aged 17-19. We compared GI between sensorineural HL, conductive HL, and those with normal hearing. In addition, we used logistic regression to measure the associations between HL and GI after adjuring for age, sex, education, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3,104,851 adolescents assessed, 20,075 (0.6%) exhibited hearing loss (HL). We categorized general intelligence (GI) into three levels for analysis: low (lowest category), medium, and high (reference category). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) revealed that sensorineural HL (SNHL) was associated with lower GI levels, with ORs ranging from 1.3 [95% CI 1.4-1.2] for the lowest GI category to 1.1 [95% CI 1.15-0.04] for the medium category. Conductive HL (CHL) also demonstrated significant associations, with ORs from 1.8 [95% CI 1.9-1.6] for the lowest GI level to 1.1 [95% CI 1.2-0.9] for medium. Further analysis revealed a statistically significant, severity-dependent relationship between SNHL and the odds of being in the lowest GI quartile (Q1). Specifically, the odds ratios for SNHL ranged from 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.3] to 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.5] as severity increased, indicating a strong link between greater SNHL severity and reduced cognitive performance. In contrast, CHL did not show a consistent correlation between its severity and GI outcomes, with an OR of 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.3] across severity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report a strong relationship between HL and GI in late adolescence. Sensorineural HL, but not conductive HL, demonstrated a severity-based decline in GI. The results highlight the value of early, specifically targeted therapies for HL that consider its etiology and degree.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a relationship between general intelligence (GI) in youth and hearing loss (HL). However, no large-scale study assessed the relations of GI in late adolescence with conductive HL and sensorineural HL, stratified by severity. This study examined the connection between HL and GI in late adolescence.

Methods: Cross-sectional study on mandatory pre-military recruitment data recorded during 1967-2019 of patients aged 17-19. We compared GI between sensorineural HL, conductive HL, and those with normal hearing. In addition, we used logistic regression to measure the associations between HL and GI after adjuring for age, sex, education, and socioeconomic status.

Results: Among 3,104,851 adolescents assessed, 20,075 (0.6%) exhibited hearing loss (HL). We categorized general intelligence (GI) into three levels for analysis: low (lowest category), medium, and high (reference category). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) revealed that sensorineural HL (SNHL) was associated with lower GI levels, with ORs ranging from 1.3 [95% CI 1.4-1.2] for the lowest GI category to 1.1 [95% CI 1.15-0.04] for the medium category. Conductive HL (CHL) also demonstrated significant associations, with ORs from 1.8 [95% CI 1.9-1.6] for the lowest GI level to 1.1 [95% CI 1.2-0.9] for medium. Further analysis revealed a statistically significant, severity-dependent relationship between SNHL and the odds of being in the lowest GI quartile (Q1). Specifically, the odds ratios for SNHL ranged from 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.3] to 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.5] as severity increased, indicating a strong link between greater SNHL severity and reduced cognitive performance. In contrast, CHL did not show a consistent correlation between its severity and GI outcomes, with an OR of 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.3] across severity levels.

Conclusion: We report a strong relationship between HL and GI in late adolescence. Sensorineural HL, but not conductive HL, demonstrated a severity-based decline in GI. The results highlight the value of early, specifically targeted therapies for HL that consider its etiology and degree.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全国范围内对 3,104,851 名青少年的智力和听力损失进行了基于人口的研究。
目的:流行病学研究表明,青少年的一般智力(GI)与听力损失(HL)之间存在关系。然而,还没有大规模的研究对青少年晚期的一般智力(GI)与传导性听力损失和感音神经性听力损失之间的关系进行评估。本研究探讨了青少年晚期听力损失与 GI 之间的关系:方法:对 1967-2019 年期间记录的 17-19 岁患者征兵前的强制性数据进行横断面研究。我们比较了感音神经性 HL、传导性 HL 和听力正常者的 GI。此外,在对年龄、性别、教育程度和社会经济状况进行判定后,我们使用逻辑回归法测量了 HL 与 GI 之间的关联:在接受评估的 3,104,851 名青少年中,有 20,075 人(0.6%)患有听力损失(HL)。我们将一般智力(GI)分为三个等级进行分析:低(最低等级)、中和高(参考等级)。调整后的几率比(ORs)显示,感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)与较低的智力水平相关,最低智力水平的几率比为 1.3 [95% CI 1.4-1.2],中等智力水平的几率比为 1.1 [95% CI 1.15-0.04]。传导性 HL(CHL)也显示出显著的关联性,ORs 从最低 GI 级别的 1.8 [95% CI 1.9-1.6] 到中等级别的 1.1 [95% CI 1.2-0.9] 不等。进一步分析表明,SNHL 与处于最低 GI 四分位数(Q1)的几率之间存在统计学意义上显著的严重程度依赖关系。具体来说,随着严重程度的增加,SNHL 的几率比为 1.2 [95% CI 1.1-1.3] 到 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.5],这表明 SNHL 严重程度越高,认知能力越差。相比之下,CHL的严重程度与消化道结果之间并不存在一致的相关性,不同严重程度的OR值为1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.3]:结论:我们报告了HL与青春期后期消化道疾病之间的密切关系。感音性 HL(而非传导性 HL)显示出 GI 严重程度的下降。这些结果凸显了考虑到 HL 病因和程度的早期针对性疗法的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Different Auditory Stimuli and Cognitive Tasks on Balance in Healthy Young Adults. A case series suggests peaking transimpedance as a possible marker for scalar dislocations in cochlear implantation. A Nationwide, Population-based Study of Intelligence and Hearing Loss Among 3,104,851 Adolescents. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Negatively Impacts Cognition in Older Subjects with Normal Lateral Semi-Circular Canal Function. The efficacy of a food supplement in the treatment of tinnitus with comorbid headache: A Statistical and Machine Learning analysis with a literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1