Factibilidad, fiabilidad y validez del cuestionario VIG-express como instrumento de valoración multidimensional/geriátrica rápida: estudio multicéntrico
Núria Gutiérrez Jiménez , Eva Satué-Gracia , Joan Carles Contel , Josep Basora Gallisà , Jordi Amblàs-Novellas
{"title":"Factibilidad, fiabilidad y validez del cuestionario VIG-express como instrumento de valoración multidimensional/geriátrica rápida: estudio multicéntrico","authors":"Núria Gutiérrez Jiménez , Eva Satué-Gracia , Joan Carles Contel , Josep Basora Gallisà , Jordi Amblàs-Novellas","doi":"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and validity of the VIG-express questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Catalonia.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>24 professionals from 18 centers: 10 from Primary Care, 5 from hospitals acute, 2 intermediate care and 3 residential.</div></div><div><h3>Main measurements</h3><div>For the feasibility analysis, the administration time -mean and standard deviation (SD)-. The questionnaire was administered twice to the same patient by the same professional (intraobserver agreement), or by two different professionals (interobserver agreement), evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the responses of subgroup with higher fragility (percentile ><!--> <!-->75) and subgroup with lower fragility (percentile <<!--> <!-->25), for each item of the questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>195 questionnaires were administered, 59 repeatedly, in a group of elderly (mean age of 79 years) and fragile (mean score of 0.33 in the Fragile Index-VIG). The average administration time was 6.52<!--> <!-->minutes (DE: 6.02). The concordance in the degree of fragility score obtained a ICC of 0.95 (intraobserver) and 0.72 (interobserver). In discriminant validity, the differences in response frequencies between the two subgroups ranged from 1.7 (oncological disease) to 67.1 (medication management), all of which were statistically significant (p<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.05), with the sole exceptions of the presence of oncological and neurological diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The VIG-express questionnaire appears to be a feasible, reliable and valid tool for rapid multidimensional/geriatric assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55435,"journal":{"name":"Atencion Primaria","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 103108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atencion Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and validity of the VIG-express questionnaire.
Design
Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study.
Setting
Catalonia.
Participants
24 professionals from 18 centers: 10 from Primary Care, 5 from hospitals acute, 2 intermediate care and 3 residential.
Main measurements
For the feasibility analysis, the administration time -mean and standard deviation (SD)-. The questionnaire was administered twice to the same patient by the same professional (intraobserver agreement), or by two different professionals (interobserver agreement), evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the responses of subgroup with higher fragility (percentile > 75) and subgroup with lower fragility (percentile < 25), for each item of the questionnaire.
Results
195 questionnaires were administered, 59 repeatedly, in a group of elderly (mean age of 79 years) and fragile (mean score of 0.33 in the Fragile Index-VIG). The average administration time was 6.52 minutes (DE: 6.02). The concordance in the degree of fragility score obtained a ICC of 0.95 (intraobserver) and 0.72 (interobserver). In discriminant validity, the differences in response frequencies between the two subgroups ranged from 1.7 (oncological disease) to 67.1 (medication management), all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.05), with the sole exceptions of the presence of oncological and neurological diseases.
Conclusions
The VIG-express questionnaire appears to be a feasible, reliable and valid tool for rapid multidimensional/geriatric assessment.
期刊介绍:
Atención Primaria es una revista que publica trabajos de investigación relativos al ámbito de la atención primaria de salud. Desde el punto de vista conceptual, Atención Primaria asume el nuevo modelo de atención primaria de salud, orientado no sólo a la curación de la enfermedad, sino también a su prevención y a la promoción de la salud, tanto en el plano individual como en el de la familia y la comunidad. En estos nuevos aspectos que definen el modelo de atención primaria de salud es en los que se centran los trabajos de investigación que publica Atención Primaria, la primera revista de originales española creada para recoger y difundir la producción científica realizada desde los centros de atención primaria de salud sobre cuestiones como protocolización de la asistencia, programas de prevención, seguimiento y control de pacientes crónicos, organización y gestión de la asistencia primaria, entre otros.