The provision of bereavement care by general practitioners: data from a sentinel network.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1186/s12875-024-02625-9
Sophie C Renckens, H Roeline Pasman, Nienke J Veldhuijzen, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
{"title":"The provision of bereavement care by general practitioners: data from a sentinel network.","authors":"Sophie C Renckens, H Roeline Pasman, Nienke J Veldhuijzen, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02625-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited information exists regarding the prevalence of bereavement care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and in what cases they provide this. Insights into the current practice of bereavement care provision by GPs can highlight areas for improvement of the bereavement care practice. Therefore, we examined in how many cases GPs contacted relatives regarding bereavement care, and which case-specific characteristics are associated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study had a retrospective cross-sectional design and used data from a clustered sample of 52 GP-practices in the Netherlands. Patient cases were included if they were one year or older and died between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2022. The main outcome was whether the GP had had contact with relatives regarding bereavement care or planned to do so. Descriptive statistics were used, as well as logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following 86.4% of deaths, GPs either had contact with or planned to have contact with relatives of their deceased patients regarding bereavement care. This likelihood was higher in non-sudden deaths compared to sudden deaths (odds ratio [OR] 1.60). In cases of non-sudden death, GPs were more likely to provide bereavement care if an informal caregiver was involved (OR 3.81), or if the GP was part of a palliative care at home group (PaTz) (OR 2.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the majority of cases GPs reach out to the relatives of their deceased patients to offer bereavement care. Given their familiarity with the deceased person, particularly instances of non-sudden death, the GP seems to be well-positioned to provide bereavement care, especially support that focuses on reviewing the period leading up to the death.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02625-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited information exists regarding the prevalence of bereavement care provision by general practitioners (GPs) and in what cases they provide this. Insights into the current practice of bereavement care provision by GPs can highlight areas for improvement of the bereavement care practice. Therefore, we examined in how many cases GPs contacted relatives regarding bereavement care, and which case-specific characteristics are associated.

Methods: This study had a retrospective cross-sectional design and used data from a clustered sample of 52 GP-practices in the Netherlands. Patient cases were included if they were one year or older and died between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2022. The main outcome was whether the GP had had contact with relatives regarding bereavement care or planned to do so. Descriptive statistics were used, as well as logistic regression analyses with generalized estimating equations.

Results: Following 86.4% of deaths, GPs either had contact with or planned to have contact with relatives of their deceased patients regarding bereavement care. This likelihood was higher in non-sudden deaths compared to sudden deaths (odds ratio [OR] 1.60). In cases of non-sudden death, GPs were more likely to provide bereavement care if an informal caregiver was involved (OR 3.81), or if the GP was part of a palliative care at home group (PaTz) (OR 2.78).

Conclusions: In the majority of cases GPs reach out to the relatives of their deceased patients to offer bereavement care. Given their familiarity with the deceased person, particularly instances of non-sudden death, the GP seems to be well-positioned to provide bereavement care, especially support that focuses on reviewing the period leading up to the death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医生提供的丧亲护理:来自哨点网络的数据。
背景:关于全科医生(GPs)提供丧亲关怀的普遍程度以及在何种情况下提供这种关怀的信息有限。了解全科医生目前提供丧亲关怀的实践情况,可以突出丧亲关怀实践中需要改进的地方。因此,我们研究了全科医生就丧亲关怀与亲属联系的案例数量,以及与之相关的具体案例特征:本研究采用回顾性横断面设计,使用的数据来自荷兰 52 家全科医生诊所的聚类样本。在2018年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间死亡的年满1岁或1岁以上的患者病例均被纳入研究范围。主要结果是全科医生是否与亲属就丧亲护理进行过接触或计划这样做。结果显示,86.4%的死亡病例的全科医生曾与亲属就丧亲护理进行过联系,或计划进行联系:结果:86.4%的死亡病例发生后,全科医生曾就丧亲关怀事宜与死者亲属接触或计划与死者亲属接触。与猝死相比,非猝死患者的这种可能性更高(几率比 [OR] 1.60)。在非猝死病例中,如果有非正规护理人员参与(OR 3.81),或者全科医生是居家姑息关怀小组(PaTz)的成员(OR 2.78),全科医生就更有可能提供丧亲关怀:在大多数情况下,全科医生都会向逝者亲属提供丧亲关怀。鉴于全科医生对逝者的熟悉程度,尤其是在非猝死的情况下,全科医生似乎完全有能力提供丧亲关怀,尤其是侧重于回顾逝者生前的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-pandemic patient safety: have the characteristics of incidents with harm changed? Comparative observational study in primary care via review of medical records with a trigger tool. Opportunities of integrated care to improve equity for adults with complex needs: a qualitative study of case management in primary care. Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review. Turnover intention and continuing professional development of rural doctors from targeted admission medical education program in China: a cross-sectional study in the post-COVID-19 era. Chronic kidney disease in older adults: challenges and opportunities for the primary care provider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1