Implementing Screening for Neonatal Delirium in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000752
Meghana Karmarkar, Mark Speziale, Willough Jenkins, Danielle Heath, Jane Kang, Julia Suvak, Peggy Grimm, Laurel Moyer
{"title":"Implementing Screening for Neonatal Delirium in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Meghana Karmarkar, Mark Speziale, Willough Jenkins, Danielle Heath, Jane Kang, Julia Suvak, Peggy Grimm, Laurel Moyer","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delirium is not commonly diagnosed in neonatal intensive care units and can adversely impact patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Recognition of delirium in the NICU is a necessary first step to address the potential impact on neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement initiative implementing screening for neonatal delirium. We aimed to increase screening in NICU patients from 0% to 85% by March 2022. Interdisciplinary meetings were held with key stakeholders to develop a clinical algorithm. We used standardized tools for delirium screening. Our process measures included weekly nursing compliance with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale/Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium/ scoring documentation (Fig. 1) and patients referred to psychiatry. Outcome measures included the percentage of patients screened for delirium before discharge. We conducted Plan-Do-Study Act cycles to optimize the screening process in the electronic medical record (EMR). This included creating an order set, documentation flowsheets, and prompts in the EMR for patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After initial implementation, we achieved an average weekly screening compliance of 76% (Fig. 1). Inclusion criteria expansion resulted in a downward compliance shift to 59%. Subsequently, the addition of the EMR checklist resulted in a center-line shift to a sustained average weekly screening compliance of 77%. An average of 82% of all eligible NICU patients received delirium screening before discharge (Fig. 2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using quality improvement methodology, there was increased screening and recognition of delirium in our NICU. Future research efforts could focus on assessing preventive measures and the impact of neonatal delirium on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delirium is not commonly diagnosed in neonatal intensive care units and can adversely impact patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Recognition of delirium in the NICU is a necessary first step to address the potential impact on neonatal outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative implementing screening for neonatal delirium. We aimed to increase screening in NICU patients from 0% to 85% by March 2022. Interdisciplinary meetings were held with key stakeholders to develop a clinical algorithm. We used standardized tools for delirium screening. Our process measures included weekly nursing compliance with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale/Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium/ scoring documentation (Fig. 1) and patients referred to psychiatry. Outcome measures included the percentage of patients screened for delirium before discharge. We conducted Plan-Do-Study Act cycles to optimize the screening process in the electronic medical record (EMR). This included creating an order set, documentation flowsheets, and prompts in the EMR for patients.

Results: After initial implementation, we achieved an average weekly screening compliance of 76% (Fig. 1). Inclusion criteria expansion resulted in a downward compliance shift to 59%. Subsequently, the addition of the EMR checklist resulted in a center-line shift to a sustained average weekly screening compliance of 77%. An average of 82% of all eligible NICU patients received delirium screening before discharge (Fig. 2).

Conclusions: Using quality improvement methodology, there was increased screening and recognition of delirium in our NICU. Future research efforts could focus on assessing preventive measures and the impact of neonatal delirium on patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新生儿重症监护病房实施新生儿谵妄筛查:质量改进计划。
简介:谵妄在新生儿重症监护病房并不常见,但会对重症监护病房的患者预后产生不利影响。识别新生儿重症监护室中的谵妄是解决新生儿预后潜在影响的第一步:我们开展了一项质量改进计划,对新生儿谵妄进行筛查。我们的目标是到 2022 年 3 月,将新生儿重症监护室患者的筛查率从 0% 提高到 85%。我们与主要利益相关者召开了跨学科会议,以制定临床算法。我们使用标准化工具进行谵妄筛查。我们的过程测量包括每周护理人员对里士满躁动镇静量表/康奈尔儿科谵妄评估/评分记录的遵守情况(图 1)和转诊至精神科的患者。结果测量包括出院前筛查出谵妄的患者比例。我们进行了 "计划-实施-研究"(Plan-Do-Study Act)循环,以优化电子病历(EMR)中的筛查流程。这包括在 EMR 中为患者创建订单集、文档流程表和提示:初步实施后,我们每周的平均筛查达标率为 76%(图 1)。扩大纳入标准后,符合率下降到 59%。随后,增加了电子病历核对表后,每周平均筛查达标率持续保持在 77% 的中线水平。在所有符合条件的新生儿重症监护病房患者中,平均有 82% 的患者在出院前接受了谵妄筛查(图 2):通过质量改进方法,我们的新生儿重症监护室对谵妄的筛查和识别率有所提高。今后的研究工作可侧重于评估预防措施以及新生儿谵妄对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Safety: Needs Assessment and Informed Curriculum at an Academic Children's Hospital. Implementing Screening for Neonatal Delirium in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Quality Improvement Initiative. Is Neonatal Delirium Ready for Prime Time Quality Improvement? Outpatient Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Low-risk Children with Solid Tumors: A Quality Improvement Initiative. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1