Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-09-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0104
Sally K Stauder, Shalmali R Borkar, Anna Najor, Adrienne Hunter, Christopher DeStephano, Michael Mohseni
{"title":"Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Sally K Stauder, Shalmali R Borkar, Anna Najor, Adrienne Hunter, Christopher DeStephano, Michael Mohseni","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decreasing primary care access and increasing emergency department (ED) usage is a potential contributor to declining cancer screening prevalences in those facing barriers to health care access. The ED is a non-traditional yet potentially high-yield setting for implementation of interventions to monitor and increase cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ED-administered survey in July 2022 gathered data on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination status of females presenting to the ED for care. This was compared with electronic health record (EHR) data extraction of all ED patients during the same timeframe. Primary outcome was proportion of cancer screening and HPV vaccination not up to date in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ED survey was administered to 101 individuals; EHR data was extracted on 2934 patients. Survey versus EHR, respectively, found cervical cancer screening was not up to date in 6.2% vs. 77.6%, breast cancer screening in 14.3% vs. 73.4%, colorectal cancer screening in 22.9% vs. 56.5%, and HPV vaccination in 33.3% vs. 57.8%. <i>p</i> value was < 0.001 for all screening category comparisons between survey and EHR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our data indicate significant discrepancies between self-reported screening history and EHR data. ED survey results were more in line with the observed screening rates in various surveillance systems and published in the literature. This suggests that point-of-care ED survey administration may be more effective in identifying those needing preventative cancer screening, especially in individuals with less access to routine health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"689-696"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decreasing primary care access and increasing emergency department (ED) usage is a potential contributor to declining cancer screening prevalences in those facing barriers to health care access. The ED is a non-traditional yet potentially high-yield setting for implementation of interventions to monitor and increase cancer screening.

Methods: An ED-administered survey in July 2022 gathered data on breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening, as well as human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination status of females presenting to the ED for care. This was compared with electronic health record (EHR) data extraction of all ED patients during the same timeframe. Primary outcome was proportion of cancer screening and HPV vaccination not up to date in each group.

Results: ED survey was administered to 101 individuals; EHR data was extracted on 2934 patients. Survey versus EHR, respectively, found cervical cancer screening was not up to date in 6.2% vs. 77.6%, breast cancer screening in 14.3% vs. 73.4%, colorectal cancer screening in 22.9% vs. 56.5%, and HPV vaccination in 33.3% vs. 57.8%. p value was < 0.001 for all screening category comparisons between survey and EHR.

Discussion: Our data indicate significant discrepancies between self-reported screening history and EHR data. ED survey results were more in line with the observed screening rates in various surveillance systems and published in the literature. This suggests that point-of-care ED survey administration may be more effective in identifying those needing preventative cancer screening, especially in individuals with less access to routine health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较急诊科不同数字健康方法的癌症一级和二级预防文件。
背景:初级医疗服务的减少和急诊科(ED)使用率的增加是导致面临医疗服务障碍的人群癌症筛查率下降的潜在原因。急诊室是一个非传统的、但却具有潜在高收益的场所,可用于实施干预措施以监测和提高癌症筛查率:方法:2022 年 7 月,在急诊室进行了一项调查,收集了到急诊室就诊的女性的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查数据以及人类乳头瘤病毒 (HPV) 疫苗接种情况。该数据与同一时间段内所有急诊室患者的电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据提取结果进行了比较。主要结果是各组中癌症筛查和HPV疫苗接种未及时的比例:对 101 人进行了急诊室调查;提取了 2934 名患者的电子病历数据。调查与电子病历比较发现,宫颈癌筛查未及时接种的比例分别为 6.2% 对 77.6%,乳腺癌筛查未及时接种的比例分别为 14.3% 对 73.4%,结直肠癌筛查未及时接种的比例分别为 22.9% 对 56.5%,HPV 疫苗接种未及时接种的比例分别为 33.3% 对 57.8%:讨论:我们的数据表明,自我报告的筛查史与电子病历数据之间存在明显差异。急诊室调查的结果更符合各种监测系统中观察到的筛查率以及文献中发表的结果。这表明,在护理点进行急诊室调查可能会更有效地识别出需要进行预防性癌症筛查的人群,尤其是在较少获得常规医疗保健服务的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Young Adults' Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Increased risks of Maternal Mental Health Conditions Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila, Prevotellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae spp. as Possible Markers in Women-Related Nutritional and Clinical Trials: Familial Mediterranean Fever Disease. Impact of Illness Perception in Overweight and Obesity on Bio-Functional Age and Eating/Movement Behavior-A Follow-Up Study. Web-Based Development of Standard Operating Procedures and Midwifery Trainings at Ugandan Birth Clinic in the Framework of Implementing a Quality Improvement System for the MEWU-Midwife Exchange with Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1