Prognostic Evaluation of Chagasic and Non-Chagasic Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Implantation and Cardiac Resynchronization in a Tertiary Center.

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36660/abc.20230875
Laís Toledo de Vasconcelos, Larissa Natany Almeida Martins, Anna Terra França, Fábio Morato de Castilho, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
{"title":"Prognostic Evaluation of Chagasic and Non-Chagasic Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Implantation and Cardiac Resynchronization in a Tertiary Center.","authors":"Laís Toledo de Vasconcelos, Larissa Natany Almeida Martins, Anna Terra França, Fábio Morato de Castilho, Antônio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro","doi":"10.36660/abc.20230875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChCC) is one of the causes of the implantation of pacemakers (PM) in many patients and has been associated with an adverse prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the prognosis of the chagasic and non-chagasic populations undergoing PM and cardiac resynchronizer implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational, retrospective study, which analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent implantation of these devices, in a tertiary center, from October 2007 to December 2017, comparing the chagasic group with non-chagasic patients. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate patient survival. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. The primary outcome was mortality from any cause, while the secondary outcomes were the occurrence of hospitalization and the combination of hospitalization and death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 911 patients were included, of which 23.4% had ChCC. In a Cox analysis adjusted for sex and age, Chagas disease (ChD) was not associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 1.14, CI:95%, 0.86-1.51, p=0.365), hospitalization (HR: 0.79, CI:95%, 0.61-1.04, p=0.09) or combined outcome of death and hospitalization (HR: 0.90, CI:95%, 0.72-1 .12, p=0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChD was not associated with an increased risk of death, hospitalization, or combined outcome of death and hospitalization, even after adjustment for sex and age. These results contrast with those of previous studies and suggest changes in the quality of care of patients with cardiomyopathy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"121 9","pages":"e20230875"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20230875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChCC) is one of the causes of the implantation of pacemakers (PM) in many patients and has been associated with an adverse prognosis.

Objectives: To compare the prognosis of the chagasic and non-chagasic populations undergoing PM and cardiac resynchronizer implantation.

Methods: Observational, retrospective study, which analyzed a cohort of patients who underwent implantation of these devices, in a tertiary center, from October 2007 to December 2017, comparing the chagasic group with non-chagasic patients. The non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate patient survival. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 5%. The primary outcome was mortality from any cause, while the secondary outcomes were the occurrence of hospitalization and the combination of hospitalization and death.

Results: A total of 911 patients were included, of which 23.4% had ChCC. In a Cox analysis adjusted for sex and age, Chagas disease (ChD) was not associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 1.14, CI:95%, 0.86-1.51, p=0.365), hospitalization (HR: 0.79, CI:95%, 0.61-1.04, p=0.09) or combined outcome of death and hospitalization (HR: 0.90, CI:95%, 0.72-1 .12, p=0.49).

Conclusions: ChD was not associated with an increased risk of death, hospitalization, or combined outcome of death and hospitalization, even after adjustment for sex and age. These results contrast with those of previous studies and suggest changes in the quality of care of patients with cardiomyopathy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对一家三级医疗中心接受起搏器植入术和心脏再同步化术的南美锥虫病和非南美锥虫病患者的预后评估
背景:恰加斯病心肌病(ChCC)是导致许多患者植入心脏起搏器(PM)的原因之一,并与不良预后有关:比较接受心脏起搏器和心脏再同步器植入术的恰加斯病和非恰加斯病人群的预后:观察性、回顾性研究,分析了2007年10月至2017年12月在一家三级中心接受这些设备植入手术的患者队列,比较了南美锥虫病组和非南美锥虫病患者。采用非参数卡普兰-梅耶法计算患者存活率。统计分析采用的显著性水平为 5%。主要结果是任何原因导致的死亡率,次要结果是住院情况以及住院与死亡的合并情况:共纳入 911 名患者,其中 23.4% 患有 ChCC。在对性别和年龄进行调整后的 Cox 分析中,南美锥虫病(ChD)与死亡风险增加(HR:1.14,CI:95%,0.86-1.51,P=0.365)、住院风险增加(HR:0.79,CI:95%,0.61-1.04,P=0.09)或死亡和住院的合并结果(HR:0.90,CI:95%,0.72-1.12,P=0.49)无关:即使对性别和年龄进行了调整,胆总管结石也不会增加死亡、住院或死亡和住院综合结果的风险。这些结果与之前的研究结果形成鲜明对比,表明心肌病患者的护理质量发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Pulsed Field Ablation on Atrial Fibrillation. Is This a Causal Relationship? Mendelian Randomization as a Statistical Method for Unraveling Connections. Lyme Carditis: An Infectious Cause of Atrioventricular Block - A Case Report. Atrial Cardiomyopathy and Hypertension: Connections between Arterial Stiffness and Subclinical Atrial Arrhythmias. Potentially Inappropriate Cardioverter Defibrillator Implants in Secondary Prevention of Death.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1