The effect of one-room CT guided brachytherapy on procedure time and cost in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.254
Evelien B van Well, Timothy N Showalter, Stavroula Giannouli, Elena Nioutsikou, Maroeska M Rovers, Tim M Govers
{"title":"The effect of one-room CT guided brachytherapy on procedure time and cost in the treatment of cervical cancer.","authors":"Evelien B van Well, Timothy N Showalter, Stavroula Giannouli, Elena Nioutsikou, Maroeska M Rovers, Tim M Govers","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Brachytherapy is associated with improved overall survival in cervical cancer patients, but the utilization seems hindered by high costs and relatively low reimbursement, particularly in the US. A one-room brachytherapy suite with CT (ORBT) could optimize the treatment workflow. By eliminating transport and waiting times, limiting applicator movement, and providing real-time applicator placement feedback, treatment time and costs could potentially be reduced. This study assesses the potential value of implementing ORBT in cervical cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A variable cost model was developed to compare current (multi-room) brachytherapy workflows (MBRT) to ORBT, taking into account staff utilization, staff, equipment and consumables costs and room expenses. Two current care scenarios were simulated; applicator placement performed in the operating room (S1), and applicator placement performed in a brachytherapy suite (S2). For both scenarios literature reported fraction times of MBRT were compared to a range of ORBT times. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the influence of input parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In scenario one, the results showed yearly savings of $45,572 up to $339,439 (USD), assuming a 5% and 20% reduction in fraction duration, respectively, in ORBT compared to MRBT. In scenario two, ORBT does not result in costs savings at 5% to 15% improvement. Therefore, only when ORBT results in a >20% improvement of fraction time, cost will be saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that reducing procedure time (using ORBT) can lead to cost savings, depending on the current workflow. Savings seem to depend mostly on applicator placement location, number of patients per year, and involved personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":" ","pages":"30-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2024.08.254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Brachytherapy is associated with improved overall survival in cervical cancer patients, but the utilization seems hindered by high costs and relatively low reimbursement, particularly in the US. A one-room brachytherapy suite with CT (ORBT) could optimize the treatment workflow. By eliminating transport and waiting times, limiting applicator movement, and providing real-time applicator placement feedback, treatment time and costs could potentially be reduced. This study assesses the potential value of implementing ORBT in cervical cancer treatment.

Methods and materials: A variable cost model was developed to compare current (multi-room) brachytherapy workflows (MBRT) to ORBT, taking into account staff utilization, staff, equipment and consumables costs and room expenses. Two current care scenarios were simulated; applicator placement performed in the operating room (S1), and applicator placement performed in a brachytherapy suite (S2). For both scenarios literature reported fraction times of MBRT were compared to a range of ORBT times. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the influence of input parameters.

Results: In scenario one, the results showed yearly savings of $45,572 up to $339,439 (USD), assuming a 5% and 20% reduction in fraction duration, respectively, in ORBT compared to MRBT. In scenario two, ORBT does not result in costs savings at 5% to 15% improvement. Therefore, only when ORBT results in a >20% improvement of fraction time, cost will be saved.

Conclusions: The results indicate that reducing procedure time (using ORBT) can lead to cost savings, depending on the current workflow. Savings seem to depend mostly on applicator placement location, number of patients per year, and involved personnel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单室 CT 引导近距离放射治疗对治疗宫颈癌的手术时间和成本的影响。
目的:近距离放射治疗可提高宫颈癌患者的总生存率,但高昂的费用和相对较低的报销额度似乎阻碍了近距离放射治疗的使用,尤其是在美国。带 CT 的单间近距离治疗室(ORBT)可优化治疗工作流程。通过消除运输和等待时间、限制涂药器移动以及提供实时涂药器位置反馈,治疗时间和成本都有可能减少。本研究评估了在宫颈癌治疗中实施 ORBT 的潜在价值:考虑到人员利用率、人员、设备和消耗品成本以及病房费用,我们开发了一个可变成本模型,用于比较当前(多病房)近距离放射治疗工作流程(MBRT)和 ORBT。模拟了两种当前的护理方案:在手术室(S1)中放置涂药器和在近距离治疗室(S2)中放置涂药器。在这两种情况下,将文献报道的 MBRT 分馏时间与一系列 ORBT 时间进行比较。进行了敏感性分析,以确定输入参数的影响:在方案一中,假设 ORBT 比 MRBT 的分馏时间分别缩短 5%和 20%,结果显示每年可节省 45,572 美元至 339,439 美元(USD)。在方案二中,ORBT 在 5%至 15%的改善率下并不能节省成本。因此,只有当 ORBT 使分流时间缩短 20% 以上时,才能节省成本:结果表明,缩短手术时间(使用 ORBT)可节约成本,这取决于当前的工作流程。节省的成本似乎主要取决于涂药器的放置位置、每年的患者人数和参与人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality control study of cervical cancer interstitial brachytherapy treatment plans using statistical process control. 3D-printed radiopaque episcleral plaques with radioactive collimating cavities for enhanced dose delivery in brachytherapy. Ultrasound and CT-guided implantation of iodine-125 seeds combined with transarterial chemoembolization for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma at complex sites after hepatectomy. HDR brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for unfavorable localized prostate cancer: A single center experience from inception to standard of care. From patient to pioneer: The inspiring journey of Dr. Brian Moran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1