Health-related quality of life with rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. aspirin alone in chronic stable cardiovascular disease: Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2024-09-27 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeae083
Feng Xie, Jiajun Yan, John Eikelboom, Sonia Anand, Eva Muehlhofer, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Yang Wang, Alvaro Avezum, Deepak L Bhatt, Salim Yusuf, Jackie Bosch
{"title":"Health-related quality of life with rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs. aspirin alone in chronic stable cardiovascular disease: Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.","authors":"Feng Xie, Jiajun Yan, John Eikelboom, Sonia Anand, Eva Muehlhofer, Eleanor Pullenayegum, Yang Wang, Alvaro Avezum, Deepak L Bhatt, Salim Yusuf, Jackie Bosch","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin with aspirin alone on health-related quality of life in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-3L. The treatment effects on health utility and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) scores were compared between rivaroxaban plus aspirin and aspirin alone in terms of adjusted mean difference in change from baseline and odds ratio of having deterioration events. Nine thousand forty-nine (98.9%) and 6916 (75.5%) completed the EQ-5D-3L at baseline and at final visit, respectively. Nine thousand twenty-eight (98.9%) and 6887 (76.3%) completed the EQ-5D-3L at baseline and final visit, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) health utility and EQ VAS scores at baseline were 0.871 (0.141) and 76.0 (15.3), respectively, for the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group, compared with 0.873 (0.139) and 75.8 (15.1) for the aspirin group. Adjusted mean difference in change from baseline utility was -0.002 [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.006, 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.30] between the combination therapy group and the aspirin group. The odds ratio (95% CI) of experiencing deterioration in health utility was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93, 1.10, <i>P</i> = 0.81) between the two groups. Adjusted mean difference in change from baseline EQ VAS was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.43, 0.47, <i>P</i> = 0.93) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This analysis of the COMPASS trial demonstrated that the quality of life of patients was similar between the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and the aspirin alone group.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT01776424). Trial protocol and statistical analysis plan: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118#APPNEJMoa1709118PRO.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"4 5","pages":"oeae083"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to compare the effects of the combination of rivaroxaban and aspirin with aspirin alone on health-related quality of life in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.

Methods and results: Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-3L. The treatment effects on health utility and EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) scores were compared between rivaroxaban plus aspirin and aspirin alone in terms of adjusted mean difference in change from baseline and odds ratio of having deterioration events. Nine thousand forty-nine (98.9%) and 6916 (75.5%) completed the EQ-5D-3L at baseline and at final visit, respectively. Nine thousand twenty-eight (98.9%) and 6887 (76.3%) completed the EQ-5D-3L at baseline and final visit, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) health utility and EQ VAS scores at baseline were 0.871 (0.141) and 76.0 (15.3), respectively, for the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group, compared with 0.873 (0.139) and 75.8 (15.1) for the aspirin group. Adjusted mean difference in change from baseline utility was -0.002 [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.006, 0.002, P = 0.30] between the combination therapy group and the aspirin group. The odds ratio (95% CI) of experiencing deterioration in health utility was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93, 1.10, P = 0.81) between the two groups. Adjusted mean difference in change from baseline EQ VAS was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.43, 0.47, P = 0.93) between the two groups.

Conclusion: This analysis of the COMPASS trial demonstrated that the quality of life of patients was similar between the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and the aspirin alone group.

Registration: Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov number (NCT01776424). Trial protocol and statistical analysis plan: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118#APPNEJMoa1709118PRO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性稳定型心血管疾病患者服用利伐沙班加阿司匹林与单用阿司匹林的健康相关生活质量对比:使用抗凝策略者的心血管效果(COMPASS)试验。
目的:本研究旨在比较利伐沙班和阿司匹林联合用药与阿司匹林单独用药对使用抗凝策略者心血管结局(COMPASS)试验中健康相关生活质量的影响:使用 EQ-5D-3L 评估健康相关生活质量。比较了利伐沙班加阿司匹林和单用阿司匹林对健康效用和EQ视觉模拟量表(EQ VAS)评分的治疗效果,即与基线相比的调整后平均变化差异和发生恶化事件的几率比率。分别有949人(98.9%)和6916人(75.5%)在基线和最终访问时完成了EQ-5D-3L。九千二百八十八人(98.9%)和六千八百八十七人(76.3%)分别在基线和最终就诊时完成了 EQ-5D-3L。利伐沙班加阿司匹林组基线健康效用和EQ VAS评分的平均值(标准差)分别为0.871(0.141)和76.0(15.3),而阿司匹林组分别为0.873(0.139)和75.8(15.1)。联合疗法组与阿司匹林组之间的基线效用变化调整后平均差异为-0.002 [95% 置信区间 (CI),-0.006,0.002,P = 0.30]。两组间健康效用恶化的几率比(95% CI)为 1.01(95% CI,0.93,1.10,P = 0.81)。两组间 EQ VAS 与基线相比的调整后平均变化差异为 0.02(95% CI,-0.43,0.47,P = 0.93):COMPASS试验的这项分析表明,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林组与单用阿司匹林组患者的生活质量相似:注册:试验注册号:试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov 编号(NCT01776424)。试验方案和统计分析计划:https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118#APPNEJMoa1709118PRO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The acute effect of high-dose supplemental oxygen on haemodynamics assessed by echocardiography in patients with pulmonary vascular disease living in Quito at 2850 m: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Percutaneous thrombectomy with the FlowTriever for pulmonary embolism with right heart thrombi: a retrospective two centres study. Single high-sensitivity troponin-I for ruling out acute coronary syndrome: a detection limit approach. Beyond the heart: multisystem complications fuelling cardiac dysfunction in myotonic dystrophy type 1. Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated pathway and questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1