Factors influencing labial bone resorption after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.

Y Ouqi, J Wang, X Yang, Y Man
{"title":"Factors influencing labial bone resorption after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration: retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.","authors":"Y Ouqi, J Wang, X Yang, Y Man","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2024.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study examined factors influencing labial bone resorption in the anterior maxilla 6 months after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. Involving 79 patients (118 implants), the study measured labial horizontal bone width and vertical dimensions using cone beam computed tomography scans taken immediately after surgery and at 6 months. A generalized linear mixed model analyzed potential influencing factors: age, sex, implant site, timing of placement, buccal bone width at the implant platform level post-surgery, implant connection, and bone defect morphology. Significant bone resorption was noted at 6 months. The statistical analysis revealed that buccal bone width at the implant platform, implant connection, and bone defect morphology significantly impacted labial bone resorption, while patient age, sex, timing of placement, and implant site did not. Implants with a buccal bone width ≥2 mm showed significantly less labial horizontal and vertical bone resorption (horizontal P < 0.001, vertical P = 0.001), and healing abutments reduced resorption compared to cover screws (horizontal P = 0.002, vertical P = 0.034). More significant vertical resorption occurred in non-contained bone defects after guided bone regeneration (P = 0.040).</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.10.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective study examined factors influencing labial bone resorption in the anterior maxilla 6 months after implant insertion with simultaneous guided bone regeneration. Involving 79 patients (118 implants), the study measured labial horizontal bone width and vertical dimensions using cone beam computed tomography scans taken immediately after surgery and at 6 months. A generalized linear mixed model analyzed potential influencing factors: age, sex, implant site, timing of placement, buccal bone width at the implant platform level post-surgery, implant connection, and bone defect morphology. Significant bone resorption was noted at 6 months. The statistical analysis revealed that buccal bone width at the implant platform, implant connection, and bone defect morphology significantly impacted labial bone resorption, while patient age, sex, timing of placement, and implant site did not. Implants with a buccal bone width ≥2 mm showed significantly less labial horizontal and vertical bone resorption (horizontal P < 0.001, vertical P = 0.001), and healing abutments reduced resorption compared to cover screws (horizontal P = 0.002, vertical P = 0.034). More significant vertical resorption occurred in non-contained bone defects after guided bone regeneration (P = 0.040).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体植入后唇骨吸收的影响因素与同步引导骨再生:锥形束计算机断层扫描回顾性研究。
这项回顾性研究探讨了影响上颌前牙唇骨吸收的因素,这些因素发生在种植体植入 6 个月后,并同时引导骨再生。该研究共涉及 79 名患者(118 个种植体),使用锥形束计算机断层扫描测量了术后即刻和 6 个月后的唇骨水平宽度和垂直尺寸。广义线性混合模型分析了潜在的影响因素:年龄、性别、种植部位、植入时间、术后种植体平台水平的颊骨宽度、种植体连接和骨缺损形态。在 6 个月时,患者出现了明显的骨吸收。统计分析显示,种植体平台处的颊骨宽度、种植体连接和骨缺损形态对唇骨吸收有显著影响,而患者的年龄、性别、植入时间和植入部位则没有影响。颊骨宽度≥2 毫米的种植体的唇侧水平和垂直骨吸收明显较少(水平 P < 0.001,垂直 P = 0.001),与覆盖螺丝相比,愈合基台可减少吸收(水平 P = 0.002,垂直 P = 0.034)。在引导骨再生后,非包含性骨缺损的垂直吸收更明显(P = 0.040)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Food texture modification in head and neck cancer patients: a scoping review. Is weight-bearing as tolerated safe after proximal tibial metaphyseal autogenous bone harvest? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical treatment for uncommon malignancies of the paranasal sinuses and anterior cranial fossa: report of two cases and literature review. Soft tissue genioplasty: an innovative surgical technique for the correction of chin soft tissue abnormalities. Software-assisted bone thickness evaluation in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis undergoing Le Fort III osteotomy: a technical note.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1