Identifying and modeling the impact of neonicotinoid exposure on honey bee colony profit.

Miriam Bixby, Sarah K French, Sydney B Wizenberg, Aidan Jamieson, Mateus Pepinelli, Morgan M Cunningham, Ida M Conflitti, Leonard J Foster, Amro Zayed, Maria Marta Guarna
{"title":"Identifying and modeling the impact of neonicotinoid exposure on honey bee colony profit.","authors":"Miriam Bixby, Sarah K French, Sydney B Wizenberg, Aidan Jamieson, Mateus Pepinelli, Morgan M Cunningham, Ida M Conflitti, Leonard J Foster, Amro Zayed, Maria Marta Guarna","doi":"10.1093/jee/toae227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pollination by the European honey bee, Apis mellifera, is essential for the production of many crops, including highbush blueberries (Vaccinum corymbosum). To understand the impact of agrochemicals (specifically, neonicotinoids, a class of synthetic, neurotoxic insecticides) on these pollinators, we conducted a field study during the blueberry blooms of 2020 and 2021 in British Columbia (B.C.). Forty experimental honey bee colonies were placed in the Fraser Valley: half of the colonies were located within 1.5 km of highbush blueberry fields (\"near\" colonies) and half were located more than 1.5 km away (\"far\" colonies). We calculated risk quotients for these compounds using their chronic lethal dietary dose (LDD50) and median lethal concentration (LC50). Pesticide risk was similar between colonies located near and far from blueberry forage, suggesting that toxicity risks are regionally ubiquitous. Two systemic neonicotinoid insecticides, clothianidin and thiamethoxam, were found at quantities that exceeded chronic international levels of concern. We developed a profit model for a pollinating beekeeper in B.C. that was parameterized by: detected pesticide levels; lethal and sublethal bee health; and economic data. For colonies exposed to neonicotinoid pesticides in and out of the blueberry forage radii, there were economic consequences from colony mortality and sublethal effects such as a loss of honey production and compromised colony health. Further, replacing dead colonies with local bees was more profitable than replacing them with imported packages, illustrating that beekeeping management selection of local options can have a positive effect on overall profit.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pollination by the European honey bee, Apis mellifera, is essential for the production of many crops, including highbush blueberries (Vaccinum corymbosum). To understand the impact of agrochemicals (specifically, neonicotinoids, a class of synthetic, neurotoxic insecticides) on these pollinators, we conducted a field study during the blueberry blooms of 2020 and 2021 in British Columbia (B.C.). Forty experimental honey bee colonies were placed in the Fraser Valley: half of the colonies were located within 1.5 km of highbush blueberry fields ("near" colonies) and half were located more than 1.5 km away ("far" colonies). We calculated risk quotients for these compounds using their chronic lethal dietary dose (LDD50) and median lethal concentration (LC50). Pesticide risk was similar between colonies located near and far from blueberry forage, suggesting that toxicity risks are regionally ubiquitous. Two systemic neonicotinoid insecticides, clothianidin and thiamethoxam, were found at quantities that exceeded chronic international levels of concern. We developed a profit model for a pollinating beekeeper in B.C. that was parameterized by: detected pesticide levels; lethal and sublethal bee health; and economic data. For colonies exposed to neonicotinoid pesticides in and out of the blueberry forage radii, there were economic consequences from colony mortality and sublethal effects such as a loss of honey production and compromised colony health. Further, replacing dead colonies with local bees was more profitable than replacing them with imported packages, illustrating that beekeeping management selection of local options can have a positive effect on overall profit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别和模拟新烟碱暴露对蜂群利润的影响。
欧洲蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)的授粉对包括高丛蓝莓(Vaccinum corymbosum)在内的许多作物的生产至关重要。为了了解农用化学品(特别是新烟碱类,一类合成的神经毒性杀虫剂)对这些授粉者的影响,我们在不列颠哥伦比亚省(B.C.)2020 年和 2021 年蓝莓开花期间进行了一项实地研究。我们在菲沙河谷放置了 40 个实验蜂群:一半蜂群位于高丛蓝莓田 1.5 千米范围内("近 "蜂群),一半蜂群位于 1.5 千米以外("远 "蜂群)。我们使用这些化合物的慢性致死膳食剂量(LDD50)和中位数致死浓度(LC50)计算了它们的风险商数。距离蓝莓觅食地较近和较远的群落之间的农药风险相似,这表明毒性风险在区域内普遍存在。发现两种系统性新烟碱类杀虫剂--氯虫苯甲酰胺和噻虫嗪--的含量超过了国际慢性关注水平。我们为不列颠哥伦比亚省的一位授粉养蜂人建立了一个利润模型,该模型的参数包括:检测到的杀虫剂水平;致死和亚致死蜜蜂健康状况;以及经济数据。对于暴露于蓝莓饲料半径内外的新烟碱类杀虫剂的蜂群而言,蜂群死亡和亚致死效应(如蜂蜜产量损失和蜂群健康受损)会带来经济后果。此外,用本地蜜蜂取代死亡蜂群比用进口蜂群取代死亡蜂群更有利可图,这说明养蜂管理选择本地方案对总体利润有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting the distribution range of Hylurgus ligniperda (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the present and future under the influence of climate change. The impacts of climate change on the potential distribution of Cacopsylla chinensis (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in China. Diets supplemented with different solvents extracts of Lepista nuda alters longevity and fecundity, and the expression of related genes in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Diversity and role of volatile terpene and terpenoid pheromones in insects. Correction to: Electroantennographic and behavioral responses of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults to the volatiles of plum fruits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1