Analysis of Attitudes Towards Opt-Out Organ Donation Consent: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Saudi Arabian Residents

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.007
Sami Alobaidi
{"title":"Analysis of Attitudes Towards Opt-Out Organ Donation Consent: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Saudi Arabian Residents","authors":"Sami Alobaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aims to investigate public opinion on opt-out organ donation registration in Saudi Arabia, addressing a gap identified in existing research that reveals varied attitudes and intentions among the population, as indicated by studies in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed a secondary analysis approach, utilizing data from a cross-sectional survey conducted online among 1397 residents of Saudi Arabia. The survey utilized a GoogleTM form questionnaire adapted from a previous study in Qatar. The questionnaire comprised three sections, gathering socio-demographic information, assessing general awareness about organ donation, and exploring participants' agreement with opt-out consent and beliefs related to organ donation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the participants, 44.4% supported opt-out consent, with 25.7% females and 39.1% Saudi citizens. Females and diploma/graduation-level education were significantly associated with opt-out support (<em>P</em> &lt; .001, <em>P</em> = .012, respectively). 98.06% of opt-out supporters were familiar with organ donation. 93.05% agreed to promote organ donation, 98.38% believed registration saves lives, and 81.91% were willing if family had no objections. 86.75% were ready with more information, and 85.78% if informed about their religion's perspective. 92.25% believed living and posthumous donation positively impact life after death. Concerns included inadequate care (33.44%) and bodily disfigurement (28.43%) postmortem. Majority felt healthy (45.56%) and appropriate in age for donation (57.67%). Among opt-out supporters, 20.84% expressed interest, 8.4% conveyed disinterest, while 36.34% remained undecided regarding organ donation registration.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study reveals a considerable openness among Saudis toward adopting an opt-out organ donation system, suggesting a potential avenue for increased organ donation rates. While acknowledging cultural nuances, particularly familial influences, targeted interventions are vital to overcome specific barriers and ensure the successful implementation of an opt-out policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":"56 9","pages":"Pages 1916-1921"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524005268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aims to investigate public opinion on opt-out organ donation registration in Saudi Arabia, addressing a gap identified in existing research that reveals varied attitudes and intentions among the population, as indicated by studies in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This study employed a secondary analysis approach, utilizing data from a cross-sectional survey conducted online among 1397 residents of Saudi Arabia. The survey utilized a GoogleTM form questionnaire adapted from a previous study in Qatar. The questionnaire comprised three sections, gathering socio-demographic information, assessing general awareness about organ donation, and exploring participants' agreement with opt-out consent and beliefs related to organ donation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) model.

Results

Among the participants, 44.4% supported opt-out consent, with 25.7% females and 39.1% Saudi citizens. Females and diploma/graduation-level education were significantly associated with opt-out support (P < .001, P = .012, respectively). 98.06% of opt-out supporters were familiar with organ donation. 93.05% agreed to promote organ donation, 98.38% believed registration saves lives, and 81.91% were willing if family had no objections. 86.75% were ready with more information, and 85.78% if informed about their religion's perspective. 92.25% believed living and posthumous donation positively impact life after death. Concerns included inadequate care (33.44%) and bodily disfigurement (28.43%) postmortem. Majority felt healthy (45.56%) and appropriate in age for donation (57.67%). Among opt-out supporters, 20.84% expressed interest, 8.4% conveyed disinterest, while 36.34% remained undecided regarding organ donation registration.

Conclusion

The study reveals a considerable openness among Saudis toward adopting an opt-out organ donation system, suggesting a potential avenue for increased organ donation rates. While acknowledging cultural nuances, particularly familial influences, targeted interventions are vital to overcome specific barriers and ensure the successful implementation of an opt-out policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对选择不同意器官捐献的态度分析:沙特阿拉伯居民的横断面研究。
研究目的本研究旨在调查沙特阿拉伯公众对选择不进行器官捐献登记的看法,以弥补现有研究中发现的一个空白,即卡塔尔和沙特阿拉伯的研究表明,公众的态度和意向各不相同:本研究采用二次分析方法,利用对沙特阿拉伯 1397 名居民进行的在线横断面调查数据。调查使用的是根据之前在卡塔尔的一项研究改编的 GoogleTM 格式问卷。问卷由三个部分组成,分别是收集社会人口信息、评估对器官捐献的一般认识,以及利用计划行为理论(TPB)模型探讨参与者是否同意选择退出同意和与器官捐献相关的信念:在参与者中,44.4%的人支持选择不同意,其中女性占 25.7%,沙特公民占 39.1%。女性和文凭/毕业教育程度与选择不同意有显著相关性(P < .001, P = .012)。98.06%的选择退出支持者熟悉器官捐献。93.05%的人同意推广器官捐献,98.38%的人认为登记可以挽救生命,81.91%的人愿意在家人不反对的情况下进行器官捐献。86.75%的人愿意获得更多信息,85.78%的人愿意了解其宗教信仰。92.25%的人认为生前捐献和死后捐献对死后生活有积极影响。担心的问题包括死后护理不足(33.44%)和身体毁容(28.43%)。大多数人认为自己身体健康(45.56%),年龄适合捐献(57.67%)。在选择退出的支持者中,20.84%表示有兴趣,8.4%表示没有兴趣,而 36.34%对器官捐献登记仍未作出决定:研究显示,沙特人对采用选择不捐献器官制度持相当开放的态度,这表明有可能提高器官捐献率。在承认文化细微差别,尤其是家庭影响的同时,有针对性的干预对于克服特定障碍和确保选择不捐献政策的成功实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Fixed Versus Growth Mindset and the Association With Alcohol Relapse After Liver Transplantation Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Recurrent Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases After Liver transplantation: A Case Series Vitrification and Nanowarming: Redefining the Limits of Allograft Preservation for Partial Heart Transplants Infections in Liver Retransplantation: A Prospective Study of Microbial Patterns, Immune Biomarkers, and Survival Influence of Donor-Recipient Body Surface Area Ratio on Pediatric Kidney Transplant Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1