Evaluation of 3-year tuberculosis external quality assessment results of public health laboratories.

Edibe Nurzen Namli Bozkurt, S Nilay Uçarman, Ahmet Arslantürk, Alper Saribas, Derya Altun, Hamit Özsaraç, Hulya Simsek
{"title":"Evaluation of 3-year tuberculosis external quality assessment results of public health laboratories.","authors":"Edibe Nurzen Namli Bozkurt, S Nilay Uçarman, Ahmet Arslantürk, Alper Saribas, Derya Altun, Hamit Özsaraç, Hulya Simsek","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_287_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background We aimed to evaluate the 3-year participation status of tuberculosis (TB) laboratories in public health laboratories (PHL) tuberculosis external quality assessment (EQA) and EQA results. Method During 2018-2020, PHLs participated in the EQA programme organized annually by the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL). Five kinds of EQA samples were sent to the participating laboratories on three parameters, including microscopy, culture and phenotypic first-line drug susceptibility testing and they were asked to perform according to the standard protocol. The results were taken over by the Tuberculosis Laboratories Surveillance Network (TULSA) web system and analysed. Results A total of 24 PHLs participated in the EQA in 2018; 30 in 2019 and 23 in 2020. In terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility in microscopy, respectively, in 2018, 20 of the laboratories were 100%, 4 of them 80%, and in culture 16 of them were 100% and 2 of them 80%; in 2019, 28 of them were 100%, 2 of them 80%, and in culture 11 of them were 100%, 6 of them 80%, 1 of them 60%; in 2020, 20 of them were 100%, 3 of them 80%, and in culture 13 of them were 100% and 3 of them 80%. Conclusion It is beneficial for laboratories working on TB to participate in EQA in terms of evaluating the accuracy and reliability of the method used.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_287_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background We aimed to evaluate the 3-year participation status of tuberculosis (TB) laboratories in public health laboratories (PHL) tuberculosis external quality assessment (EQA) and EQA results. Method During 2018-2020, PHLs participated in the EQA programme organized annually by the National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory (NTRL). Five kinds of EQA samples were sent to the participating laboratories on three parameters, including microscopy, culture and phenotypic first-line drug susceptibility testing and they were asked to perform according to the standard protocol. The results were taken over by the Tuberculosis Laboratories Surveillance Network (TULSA) web system and analysed. Results A total of 24 PHLs participated in the EQA in 2018; 30 in 2019 and 23 in 2020. In terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and reproducibility in microscopy, respectively, in 2018, 20 of the laboratories were 100%, 4 of them 80%, and in culture 16 of them were 100% and 2 of them 80%; in 2019, 28 of them were 100%, 2 of them 80%, and in culture 11 of them were 100%, 6 of them 80%, 1 of them 60%; in 2020, 20 of them were 100%, 3 of them 80%, and in culture 13 of them were 100% and 3 of them 80%. Conclusion It is beneficial for laboratories working on TB to participate in EQA in terms of evaluating the accuracy and reliability of the method used.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估公共卫生实验室 3 年结核病外部质量评估结果。
背景 我们旨在评估结核病(TB)实验室参与公共卫生实验室(PHL)结核病外部质量评估(EQA)的3年情况和EQA结果。方法 2018-2020年期间,公共卫生实验室参加了国家结核病参考实验室(NTRL)每年组织的EQA项目。五种EQA样本被送往参与实验室,包括显微镜检查、培养和表型一线药敏试验三个参数,并要求他们按照标准方案执行。结果由结核病实验室监测网络(TULSA)网络系统接收并进行分析。结果 2018 年共有 24 家公共卫生实验室参加了 EQA;2019 年有 30 家,2020 年有 23 家。在显微镜检查的敏感性、特异性、准确性和重现性方面,2018年分别有20个实验室达到100%,4个达到80%,培养方面有16个达到100%,2个达到80%;2019年有28个实验室达到100%,2个达到80%,培养方面有11个达到100%,6个达到80%,1个达到60%;2020年有20个实验室达到100%,3个达到80%,培养方面有13个达到100%,3个达到80%。结论 结核病实验室参与 EQA 对评价所用方法的准确性和可靠性是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mid-level healthcare providers: Making a fresh case for modern Indian healthcare. Palbociclib: A novel and effective therapy for advanced liposarcoma. Regional patterns in minimum diet diversity failure and associated factors among children aged 6-23 months in India. Scrub typhus presenting as mitral valve infective endocarditis. Scrub typhus presenting with massive splenomegaly and lobar pneumonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1