What Do Travelers Know about Traveler's Diarrhea? Impact of a Pre-Travel Consultation in the Lisbon Area, Portugal.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.3390/tropicalmed9100232
Joana Estrada, Cláudia Conceição, Gonçalo Figueiredo Augusto, Rosa Teodósio
{"title":"What Do Travelers Know about Traveler's Diarrhea? Impact of a Pre-Travel Consultation in the Lisbon Area, Portugal.","authors":"Joana Estrada, Cláudia Conceição, Gonçalo Figueiredo Augusto, Rosa Teodósio","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed9100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traveler's diarrhea (TD) is one of the most common travel-related health problems, largely interfering with planned activities and potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to characterize the knowledge about TD among pre-travel consultation users of one Portuguese travel clinic and determine the impact of the consultation on knowledge levels. Using a quasi-experimental, separate-sample pretest-posttest design, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: control/pre-consultation group (CG) or experimental/post-consultation group (EG). An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used. A total of 470 participants were analyzed (227 CG; 243 EG). The EG/post-consultation group showed significant improvement in knowledge, with correct answers increasing from 63% to 75% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). However, knowledge gaps persisted: over 50% were unaware of TD's self-limited nature, 30% did not recognize loperamide as a symptom reliever, and 36% believed all travelers should take antibiotics to prevent TD. The educational level and previous travel outside Europe influenced baseline knowledge; previous travel medicine consultations and information on TD improved knowledge in both groups and made it easier to acquire knowledge on the subject. Thus, a pre-travel consultation effectively increased travelers' TD knowledge. However, post-consultation knowledge levels remained suboptimal, indicating the need for targeted interventions to increase travelers' literacy and optimize pre-travel consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23330,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed9100232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traveler's diarrhea (TD) is one of the most common travel-related health problems, largely interfering with planned activities and potentially contributing to antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to characterize the knowledge about TD among pre-travel consultation users of one Portuguese travel clinic and determine the impact of the consultation on knowledge levels. Using a quasi-experimental, separate-sample pretest-posttest design, participants were randomly assigned to two groups: control/pre-consultation group (CG) or experimental/post-consultation group (EG). An anonymous self-administered questionnaire was used. A total of 470 participants were analyzed (227 CG; 243 EG). The EG/post-consultation group showed significant improvement in knowledge, with correct answers increasing from 63% to 75% (p < 0.001). However, knowledge gaps persisted: over 50% were unaware of TD's self-limited nature, 30% did not recognize loperamide as a symptom reliever, and 36% believed all travelers should take antibiotics to prevent TD. The educational level and previous travel outside Europe influenced baseline knowledge; previous travel medicine consultations and information on TD improved knowledge in both groups and made it easier to acquire knowledge on the subject. Thus, a pre-travel consultation effectively increased travelers' TD knowledge. However, post-consultation knowledge levels remained suboptimal, indicating the need for targeted interventions to increase travelers' literacy and optimize pre-travel consultations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旅行者对旅行者腹泻了解多少?旅行前咨询对葡萄牙里斯本地区的影响。
旅行者腹泻(TD)是最常见的旅行相关健康问题之一,在很大程度上影响了计划中的活动,并可能导致抗菌药耐药性。本研究旨在了解葡萄牙一家旅行诊所的旅行前咨询用户对旅行者腹泻知识的了解程度,并确定咨询对知识水平的影响。研究采用准实验、独立样本的前测-后测设计,将参与者随机分配到两组:对照/咨询前组(CG)或实验/咨询后组(EG)。采用匿名自填式问卷。共分析了 470 名参与者(227 名对照组;243 名实验组)。EG/咨询后组在知识方面有显著提高,正确答案从 63% 提高到 75%(p < 0.001)。然而,知识差距依然存在:50% 以上的人不知道 TD 具有自限性,30% 的人不知道洛哌丁胺是一种缓解症状的药物,36% 的人认为所有旅行者都应该服用抗生素来预防 TD。教育水平和以前在欧洲以外的旅行经历影响了基线知识;以前的旅行医学咨询和有关 TD 的信息提高了两组人的知识水平,使他们更容易获得这方面的知识。因此,旅行前的咨询有效地增加了旅行者的 TD 知识。然而,咨询后的知识水平仍未达到最佳,这表明有必要采取有针对性的干预措施,以提高旅行者的知识水平并优化旅行前咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Innovations in TB Screening and Preventive Therapy Services for PLHIV in Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. Estimation and Characterization of Dengue Serotypes in Patients Presenting with Dengue Fever at Makkah Hospitals. Risk of Colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Among Travellers and Migrants: A Narrative Review. Biological and Social Predictors of HIV-1 RNA Viral Suppression in ART Treated PWLH in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Global Challenge of Campylobacter: Antimicrobial Resistance and Emerging Intervention Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1