Exploring failure evolution of anti-dip slate slope using centrifuge test and discrete element method

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s10064-024-03972-8
Meng-Chia Weng, Chia-Hsun Peng, Wen-Yi Hung, Yu-Jiun Guo
{"title":"Exploring failure evolution of anti-dip slate slope using centrifuge test and discrete element method","authors":"Meng-Chia Weng,&nbsp;Chia-Hsun Peng,&nbsp;Wen-Yi Hung,&nbsp;Yu-Jiun Guo","doi":"10.1007/s10064-024-03972-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Toppling failure commonly occurs in anti-dip slate slopes due to foliation splitting and gravitational deformation. The study uses centrifuge tests and the discrete element method (DEM) to investigate the influence of foliation and existing fractures on the toppling failure evolution of anti-dip slopes. Six centrifuge tests with slate blocks obtained from an actual slope were carried out. Then, a proposed foliation model was implemented in the DEM software 3DEC to simulate the failure evolution of anti-dip slopes. The 3DEC analysis was validated by the actual failure pattern of slopes in centrifuge tests. The results indicate that the toppling failure of the anti-dip slope was initiated by existing fractures rather than the original cohesive foliation. Though the slate foliation is regarded as a weak plane in the rock mass, it retains a higher strength than the existing fracture, so the toppling failure is difficult to initiate from the cohesive foliation. The closer the fracture is to the free surface, the more pronounced the damage. In addition, the simulation indicates that the existing fracture's position also affects the anti-dip slope's failure degree. The fractures on the top propagate more easily than those on the bottom.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"83 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10064-024-03972-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-024-03972-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toppling failure commonly occurs in anti-dip slate slopes due to foliation splitting and gravitational deformation. The study uses centrifuge tests and the discrete element method (DEM) to investigate the influence of foliation and existing fractures on the toppling failure evolution of anti-dip slopes. Six centrifuge tests with slate blocks obtained from an actual slope were carried out. Then, a proposed foliation model was implemented in the DEM software 3DEC to simulate the failure evolution of anti-dip slopes. The 3DEC analysis was validated by the actual failure pattern of slopes in centrifuge tests. The results indicate that the toppling failure of the anti-dip slope was initiated by existing fractures rather than the original cohesive foliation. Though the slate foliation is regarded as a weak plane in the rock mass, it retains a higher strength than the existing fracture, so the toppling failure is difficult to initiate from the cohesive foliation. The closer the fracture is to the free surface, the more pronounced the damage. In addition, the simulation indicates that the existing fracture's position also affects the anti-dip slope's failure degree. The fractures on the top propagate more easily than those on the bottom.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用离心机试验和离散元法探索抗倾覆板岩斜坡的破坏演变过程
由于褶皱分裂和重力变形,反倾角板岩斜坡通常会发生倾覆破坏。本研究利用离心机试验和离散元素法(DEM)研究了褶皱和现有断裂对反倾角斜坡倾覆破坏演化的影响。利用从实际斜坡中获得的板岩块进行了六次离心试验。然后,在 DEM 软件 3DEC 中实施了建议的褶皱模型,以模拟反斜坡的破坏演变。离心试验中斜坡的实际破坏模式验证了 3DEC 分析。结果表明,反斜坡的倾覆破坏是由现有的断裂而不是原始的粘聚褶皱引发的。虽然板岩褶皱被认为是岩体中的薄弱面,但它的强度高于现有的断裂,因此倾覆破坏很难从内聚褶皱开始。断裂越接近自由表面,破坏越明显。此外,模拟结果表明,现有断裂的位置也会影响反斜坡的破坏程度。顶部的断裂比底部的断裂更容易扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
期刊最新文献
Creep mechanism of landslide formation in rock with bedding and weak layers in Zezhou, Shanxi, China Effects of initial water and salt content on permeability and microstructure of sodic-saline loessal soils Experimental investigation and fractional elastoplastic damage constitutive modelling of gray sandstone under loading disturbance Probabilistic landslide-generated impulse waves estimation in mountain reservoirs, a case study A novel data-driven hybrid intelligent prediction model for reservoir landslide displacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1