Critical care admissions and outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07682-3
Swagata Tripathy, Neha Singh, Aparajita Panda, Subhasish Nayak, Nivedita Jayanti Bodra, Suma Rabab Ahmad, Madhusmita Parida, Monalisa Sarkar, Soumya Sarkar
{"title":"Critical care admissions and outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review","authors":"Swagata Tripathy, Neha Singh, Aparajita Panda, Subhasish Nayak, Nivedita Jayanti Bodra, Suma Rabab Ahmad, Madhusmita Parida, Monalisa Sarkar, Soumya Sarkar","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07682-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To synthesise evidence for the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, characteristics and mortality of pregnant and postpartum women with a focus on differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and report changes in reported findings since the last review by Pollock et al. (2010).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL (2010–2023), following best practice guidelines for abstract screening for large-evidence systematic reviews. Patient and study characteristics of extracted studies were analysed descriptively. Multivariable meta-regression analysis, employing mixed-effects models, was conducted for assessing ICU admission and mortality. Studies reviewed by Pollock et al. were included to perform an overall analysis, including each study period and geographic region in a model.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Seventy-one eligible studies reported data on 111,601 women admitted to ICU, with 41,291,168 deliveries reported in 65 studies. Fifty-six studies were retrospective. Case definitions, admission criteria, and causes of mortality reported were heterogeneous. The pooled ICU admission rate was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–1.99; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99.8%), 0.4% (95% CI 0.32–0.48, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99.9%) in HICs versus 2.8% (95% CI 0.65–6.4, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 99.9%) in LMICs (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The pooled ICU mortality rate among 140,780 admissions reported in 63 studies was 6.5% (95% CI 5.2–7.9; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 98.7%), with mortality in HICs 1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 98.04%) lower than LMICs 12.4% (95% CI 8.1–17.5, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 98.9%) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Multivariable meta-regression analysis found a significant association between the ICU admission rates (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.0003) with geographic region (HIC vs LMIC). Compared to the earlier study of Pollock et al. in 2010, there was an increase in reported studies (71 vs 40 in Pollock et al. study) and reported admissions (111,601 vs 7887 Pollock et al. study), particularly from LMICs’.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Mortality for critically ill peripartum women is substantial and the gap in reported ICU admissions and mortality for critically ill peripartum women between HIC and LMICs remains unacceptably high. The reports are often small and heterogeneous using many case definitions. Reporting standards focusing on critical care processes and outcomes and large multinational prospective studies are necessary to better understand and mitigate maternal and child health challenges as sustainable development goals in LMICs and HICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07682-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To synthesise evidence for the incidence of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, characteristics and mortality of pregnant and postpartum women with a focus on differences between high-income countries (HICs) and low-middle-income countries (LMICs) and report changes in reported findings since the last review by Pollock et al. (2010).

Methods

We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL (2010–2023), following best practice guidelines for abstract screening for large-evidence systematic reviews. Patient and study characteristics of extracted studies were analysed descriptively. Multivariable meta-regression analysis, employing mixed-effects models, was conducted for assessing ICU admission and mortality. Studies reviewed by Pollock et al. were included to perform an overall analysis, including each study period and geographic region in a model.

Results

Seventy-one eligible studies reported data on 111,601 women admitted to ICU, with 41,291,168 deliveries reported in 65 studies. Fifty-six studies were retrospective. Case definitions, admission criteria, and causes of mortality reported were heterogeneous. The pooled ICU admission rate was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–1.99; I2 = 99.8%), 0.4% (95% CI 0.32–0.48, I2 = 99.9%) in HICs versus 2.8% (95% CI 0.65–6.4, I2 = 99.9%) in LMICs (p < 0.0001). The pooled ICU mortality rate among 140,780 admissions reported in 63 studies was 6.5% (95% CI 5.2–7.9; I2 = 98.7%), with mortality in HICs 1.4% (95% CI 0.8–2.1, I2 = 98.04%) lower than LMICs 12.4% (95% CI 8.1–17.5, I2 = 98.9%) (p < 0.0001). Multivariable meta-regression analysis found a significant association between the ICU admission rates (p = 0.0001) and mortality (p = 0.0003) with geographic region (HIC vs LMIC). Compared to the earlier study of Pollock et al. in 2010, there was an increase in reported studies (71 vs 40 in Pollock et al. study) and reported admissions (111,601 vs 7887 Pollock et al. study), particularly from LMICs’.

Conclusions

Mortality for critically ill peripartum women is substantial and the gap in reported ICU admissions and mortality for critically ill peripartum women between HIC and LMICs remains unacceptably high. The reports are often small and heterogeneous using many case definitions. Reporting standards focusing on critical care processes and outcomes and large multinational prospective studies are necessary to better understand and mitigate maternal and child health challenges as sustainable development goals in LMICs and HICs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孕妇和产后妇女接受重症监护的情况和结果:系统综述
目的综述有关孕妇和产后妇女入住重症监护室 (ICU) 的发生率、特征和死亡率的证据,重点关注高收入国家 (HIC) 和中低收入国家 (LMIC) 之间的差异,并报告自 Pollock 等人(2010 年)上一次综述以来报告结果的变化。方法我们按照大型证据系统综述摘要筛选的最佳实践指南检索了 Ovid Medline、EMBASE 和 CINAHL(2010-2023 年)。我们对所提取研究的患者和研究特征进行了描述性分析。采用混合效应模型进行多变量元回归分析,以评估重症监护病房入院率和死亡率。结果71项符合条件的研究报告了111,601名入住ICU的产妇的数据,其中65项研究报告了41,291,168例分娩。其中 56 项研究为回顾性研究。所报告的病例定义、入院标准和死亡原因各不相同。综合 ICU 入院率为 1.6%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.28-1.99;I2 = 99.8%),高收入国家为 0.4%(95% CI 0.32-0.48,I2 = 99.9%),低收入国家为 2.8%(95% CI 0.65-6.4,I2 = 99.9%)(p < 0.0001)。在 63 项研究报告的 140,780 例住院患者中,汇总的 ICU 死亡率为 6.5%(95% CI 5.2-7.9;I2 = 98.7%),高收入国家的死亡率为 1.4%(95% CI 0.8-2.1,I2 = 98.04%),低于低收入国家的 12.4%(95% CI 8.1-17.5,I2 = 98.9%)(p <0.0001)。多变量元回归分析发现,ICU 入院率(p = 0.0001)和死亡率(p = 0.0003)与地理区域(高收入国家与低收入国家)之间存在显著关联。与 2010 年 Pollock 等人的早期研究相比,报告的研究(Pollock 等人的研究为 71 例对 40 例)和报告的入院人数(111601 对 7887 Pollock 等人的研究)都有所增加,尤其是来自低收入国家的研究。这些报告通常篇幅较小,使用的病例定义也不尽相同。为了更好地了解和减轻孕产妇和儿童健康方面的挑战,将其作为低收入和中等收入国家以及高收入国家的可持续发展目标,有必要制定侧重于危重症护理流程和结果的报告标准,并开展大型的多国前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence interpretation of chest radiographs in intensive care. Ready for prime time? [18F]FDG PET/CT to diagnose inflammation in critically ill immunocompromised patients. Individualized response to awake prone positioning in COVID-19 patients: need deeper insights. Position paper on the physiology and nomenclature of dual circulation during venoarterial ECMO in adults. Early physiologic changes after awake prone positioning predict clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1