Artificial Intelligence for Response Assessment in Neuro Oncology (AI-RANO), part 2: recommendations for standardisation, validation, and good clinical practice

Spyridon Bakas, Philipp Vollmuth, Norbert Galldiks, Thomas C Booth, Hugo J W L Aerts, Wenya Linda Bi, Benedikt Wiestler, Pallavi Tiwari, Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Evan Calabrese, Philipp Lohmann, Martha Nowosielski, Rajan Jain, Rivka Colen, Marwa Ismail, Ghulam Rasool, Janine M Lupo, Hamed Akbari, Joerg C Tonn, Raymond Y Huang
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Response Assessment in Neuro Oncology (AI-RANO), part 2: recommendations for standardisation, validation, and good clinical practice","authors":"Spyridon Bakas, Philipp Vollmuth, Norbert Galldiks, Thomas C Booth, Hugo J W L Aerts, Wenya Linda Bi, Benedikt Wiestler, Pallavi Tiwari, Sarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Evan Calabrese, Philipp Lohmann, Martha Nowosielski, Rajan Jain, Rivka Colen, Marwa Ismail, Ghulam Rasool, Janine M Lupo, Hamed Akbari, Joerg C Tonn, Raymond Y Huang","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00315-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological advancements have enabled the extended investigation, development, and application of computational approaches in various domains, including health care. A burgeoning number of diagnostic, predictive, prognostic, and monitoring biomarkers are continuously being explored to improve clinical decision making in neuro-oncology. These advancements describe the increasing incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, including the use of radiomics. However, the broad applicability and clinical translation of AI are restricted by concerns about generalisability, reproducibility, scalability, and validation. This Policy Review intends to serve as the leading resource of recommendations for the standardisation and good clinical practice of AI approaches in health care, particularly in neuro-oncology. To this end, we investigate the repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of AI in response assessment in neuro-oncology in studies on factors affecting such computational approaches, and in publicly available open-source data and computational software tools facilitating these goals. The pathway for standardisation and validation of these approaches is discussed with the view of trustworthy AI enabling the next generation of clinical trials. We conclude with an outlook on the future of AI-enabled neuro-oncology.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00315-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advancements have enabled the extended investigation, development, and application of computational approaches in various domains, including health care. A burgeoning number of diagnostic, predictive, prognostic, and monitoring biomarkers are continuously being explored to improve clinical decision making in neuro-oncology. These advancements describe the increasing incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, including the use of radiomics. However, the broad applicability and clinical translation of AI are restricted by concerns about generalisability, reproducibility, scalability, and validation. This Policy Review intends to serve as the leading resource of recommendations for the standardisation and good clinical practice of AI approaches in health care, particularly in neuro-oncology. To this end, we investigate the repeatability, reproducibility, and stability of AI in response assessment in neuro-oncology in studies on factors affecting such computational approaches, and in publicly available open-source data and computational software tools facilitating these goals. The pathway for standardisation and validation of these approaches is discussed with the view of trustworthy AI enabling the next generation of clinical trials. We conclude with an outlook on the future of AI-enabled neuro-oncology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经肿瘤学反应评估人工智能(AI-RANO),第 2 部分:标准化、验证和良好临床实践建议
技术进步使计算方法在包括医疗保健在内的各个领域得到了广泛的研究、开发和应用。为了改善神经肿瘤学的临床决策,人们正在不断探索大量的诊断、预测、预后和监测生物标记物。这些进步表明,人工智能(AI)算法的应用日益广泛,包括放射组学的应用。然而,人工智能的广泛适用性和临床转化受到了通用性、可重复性、可扩展性和验证等问题的限制。本政策评论旨在为医疗保健领域,尤其是神经肿瘤学领域的人工智能方法标准化和良好临床实践提供主要的建议资源。为此,我们调查了神经肿瘤学反应评估中人工智能的可重复性、可再现性和稳定性,研究了影响此类计算方法的因素,以及有助于实现这些目标的公开开源数据和计算软件工具。我们讨论了这些方法的标准化和验证途径,以期让可信赖的人工智能助力下一代临床试验。最后,我们对人工智能神经肿瘤学的未来进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pesticide exposure and increased risk of breast cancer for women in rural Brazil Correction to Lancet Oncol 2024; published online Dec 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00719-8 Integrating cancer into crisis: a global vision for action from WHO and partners The changing global landscape of national cancer control plans The landscape of primary mismatch repair deficient gliomas in children, adolescents, and young adults: a multi-cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1