Surgical Tracheostomies: A Retrospective Chart Analysis Comparing ENT Specialists and Residents.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3329
Virginia Dallari, Francesca De Cecco, Carlotta Liberale, Marco Mazzola, Athena Eliana Arsie, Valerio Arietti, Daniele Monzani, Luca Sacchetto, Gabriele Molteni
{"title":"Surgical Tracheostomies: A Retrospective Chart Analysis Comparing ENT Specialists and Residents.","authors":"Virginia Dallari, Francesca De Cecco, Carlotta Liberale, Marco Mazzola, Athena Eliana Arsie, Valerio Arietti, Daniele Monzani, Luca Sacchetto, Gabriele Molteni","doi":"10.62713/aic.3329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The primary aim of our retrospective chart review is to compare open surgical (OS) tracheostomies performed by specialist and supervised resident surgeons, focusing on surgical time and post-surgical complications. The secondary objective was to compare these data based on the years of surgical experience for both specialists and residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing surgical tracheostomy at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona between 1 January 2017, and 31 December 2022, were subjected to a retrospective analysis. A total of 385 OS tracheostomies were included in the study. Procedures conducted by supervised residents across various training years were compared with those performed by junior and senior specialists, focusing on surgical duration and postoperative complications. Subsequently, these data were stratified based on the surgical experience of subgroups: residents were categorized into 4 years of training, and specialists were categorized into junior (with less than 5 years of experience) and senior (with at least 5 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analysis concerning patients' anatomy revealed a significant increase in operative times among those with no palpable neck landmarks (p = 0.006) and those with previous neck surgery (p = 0.039). Among patients' comorbidities, only anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy was found to prolong operative time (p = 0.018), while the ASA score did not correlate with the duration of surgery. Finally, no statistically significant differences in surgical time were observed (p = 0.287), and no significant differences in complication frequency were reported between supervised residents and specialists (p = 0.908), regardless of years of experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under appropriate supervision, OS tracheostomy has demonstrated safety for residents as early as their first year of residency. Residents can perform tracheostomies without significantly prolonging the duration of the operation or increasing the risk of peri- and post-operative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 5","pages":"972-978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The primary aim of our retrospective chart review is to compare open surgical (OS) tracheostomies performed by specialist and supervised resident surgeons, focusing on surgical time and post-surgical complications. The secondary objective was to compare these data based on the years of surgical experience for both specialists and residents.

Methods: All patients undergoing surgical tracheostomy at the Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Department, University of Verona between 1 January 2017, and 31 December 2022, were subjected to a retrospective analysis. A total of 385 OS tracheostomies were included in the study. Procedures conducted by supervised residents across various training years were compared with those performed by junior and senior specialists, focusing on surgical duration and postoperative complications. Subsequently, these data were stratified based on the surgical experience of subgroups: residents were categorized into 4 years of training, and specialists were categorized into junior (with less than 5 years of experience) and senior (with at least 5 years).

Results: Statistical analysis concerning patients' anatomy revealed a significant increase in operative times among those with no palpable neck landmarks (p = 0.006) and those with previous neck surgery (p = 0.039). Among patients' comorbidities, only anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy was found to prolong operative time (p = 0.018), while the ASA score did not correlate with the duration of surgery. Finally, no statistically significant differences in surgical time were observed (p = 0.287), and no significant differences in complication frequency were reported between supervised residents and specialists (p = 0.908), regardless of years of experience.

Conclusions: Under appropriate supervision, OS tracheostomy has demonstrated safety for residents as early as their first year of residency. Residents can perform tracheostomies without significantly prolonging the duration of the operation or increasing the risk of peri- and post-operative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科气管造口术:对比耳鼻喉科专科医生和住院医生的回顾性病历分析。
目的:我们进行回顾性病历审查的主要目的是比较由专科医生和接受指导的住院医生实施的开放手术气管造口术(OS),重点关注手术时间和术后并发症。次要目的是根据专科医生和住院医生的手术年限对这些数据进行比较:对2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间在维罗纳大学头颈部耳鼻喉科接受气管切开手术的所有患者进行回顾性分析。研究共纳入了 385 例操作系统气管造口术。研究人员将不同培训年限的受训住院医师进行的手术与初级和高级专家进行的手术进行了比较,重点关注手术持续时间和术后并发症。随后,根据分组的手术经验对这些数据进行了分层:住院医师分为 4 个培训年限,专科医生分为初级(少于 5 年经验)和高级(至少 5 年经验):结果:对患者解剖结构的统计分析显示,无颈部可触及标志物者(p = 0.006)和曾接受过颈部手术者(p = 0.039)的手术时间显著增加。在患者的合并症中,只有抗凝或抗凝治疗会延长手术时间(p = 0.018),而 ASA 评分与手术时间无关。最后,手术时间无统计学差异(p = 0.287),接受过指导的住院医师和专科医生之间的并发症发生率无显著差异(p = 0.908),与工作年限无关:结论:在适当的指导下,OS气管造口术对住院医师的安全性已得到证实,最早可在住院医师培训的第一年使用。住院医师可以进行气管造口术,而不会明显延长手术时间或增加围手术期和术后并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Esophagus with Lung Metastasis: Case Report. Adrenocortical Adenoma Arising from Adrenohepatic Fusion: A Mimic of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Case Report. Application Evaluation of Fluorouracil Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy in Patients after Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Comparison of Hem-o-lok and Endoloop for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Observational Retrospective Study. Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Full Endoscopic Lamina Fenestration Decompression in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Unilateral Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1