Effects of Multimodal Analgesia Combined with Comfort Management on Pain and Stress Indexes in Patients with Orthopedic Trauma after Intervention: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3527
Haining Zuo, Chao Liu, Wenchuang Fan, Xing Lu
{"title":"Effects of Multimodal Analgesia Combined with Comfort Management on Pain and Stress Indexes in Patients with Orthopedic Trauma after Intervention: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Haining Zuo, Chao Liu, Wenchuang Fan, Xing Lu","doi":"10.62713/aic.3527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the impact of combining multimodal analgesia with comfort care on pain levels, stress, negative emotions, and quality of life in individuals recovering from traumatic fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from traumatic fracture patients who underwent emergency operations at our hospital between June 2022 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative pain management: the control group, which received standard measures, and the exposure group, which received a combination of multimodal analgesia and comfort-based care. We compared these groups for pain intensity (baseline and activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores), serum stress biomarkers (norepinephrine, adrenaline, cortisol), emotional distress (self-rating depression scale (SDS), and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)), and overall quality of life (Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) score). Overall, this study evaluated differences in postoperative complications between the two pain management approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, we included 101 participants, 41 in the exposed group and 60 in the control group. Before the intervention, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, one week after the intervention, the resting and active VAS scores were significantly reduced in the exposed group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, one week after the intervention, the exposed group had lower levels of serum sodium, epinephrine, cortisol, stress, and anxiety, as well as higher physical and mental health scores on the GQOLI-74 scale. During the intervention period, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining multi-mode analgesia with comfort management for patients with traumatic fractures significantly reduces postoperative pain and stress levels. Additionally, this approach can effectively enhance patients' negative emotions and improve their quality of life. This approach holds significant promise for practical use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 5","pages":"886-893"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3527","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to assess the impact of combining multimodal analgesia with comfort care on pain levels, stress, negative emotions, and quality of life in individuals recovering from traumatic fractures.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from traumatic fracture patients who underwent emergency operations at our hospital between June 2022 and February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on their postoperative pain management: the control group, which received standard measures, and the exposure group, which received a combination of multimodal analgesia and comfort-based care. We compared these groups for pain intensity (baseline and activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores), serum stress biomarkers (norepinephrine, adrenaline, cortisol), emotional distress (self-rating depression scale (SDS), and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)), and overall quality of life (Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment Questionnaire (GQOLI-74) score). Overall, this study evaluated differences in postoperative complications between the two pain management approaches.

Results: In this study, we included 101 participants, 41 in the exposed group and 60 in the control group. Before the intervention, baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, one week after the intervention, the resting and active VAS scores were significantly reduced in the exposed group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, one week after the intervention, the exposed group had lower levels of serum sodium, epinephrine, cortisol, stress, and anxiety, as well as higher physical and mental health scores on the GQOLI-74 scale. During the intervention period, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Combining multi-mode analgesia with comfort management for patients with traumatic fractures significantly reduces postoperative pain and stress levels. Additionally, this approach can effectively enhance patients' negative emotions and improve their quality of life. This approach holds significant promise for practical use in clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式镇痛结合舒适管理对矫形创伤患者干预后疼痛和压力指数的影响:一项回顾性研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估多模式镇痛与舒适护理相结合对创伤性骨折康复者疼痛程度、压力、负面情绪和生活质量的影响:这项回顾性研究分析了 2022 年 6 月至 2024 年 2 月期间在我院接受急诊手术的创伤性骨折患者的临床数据。根据术后疼痛治疗情况,患者被分为两组:对照组和暴露组,对照组接受标准措施,暴露组则接受多模式镇痛和舒适护理相结合的治疗。我们比较了这两组的疼痛强度(基线和活动视觉模拟量表 (VAS) 评分)、血清应激生物标志物(去甲肾上腺素、肾上腺素、皮质醇)、情绪困扰(抑郁自评量表 (SDS) 和焦虑自评量表 (SAS))和总体生活质量(综合生活质量评估问卷 (GQOLI-74) 评分)。总之,本研究评估了两种疼痛治疗方法在术后并发症方面的差异:本研究共纳入 101 名参与者,其中暴露组 41 人,对照组 60 人。干预前,两组的基线特征相似(P > 0.05)。然而,干预一周后,暴露组的静息和活动 VAS 评分明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。此外,干预一周后,暴露组的血清钠、肾上腺素、皮质醇、压力和焦虑水平较低,GQOLI-74 量表中的身体和心理健康评分较高。在干预期间,两组患者的术后并发症无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:对创伤性骨折患者采用多模式镇痛与舒适管理相结合的方法可显著减轻术后疼痛和应激水平。此外,这种方法还能有效缓解患者的负面情绪,提高他们的生活质量。这种方法在临床实际应用中大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Esophagus with Lung Metastasis: Case Report. Adrenocortical Adenoma Arising from Adrenohepatic Fusion: A Mimic of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Case Report. Application Evaluation of Fluorouracil Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy in Patients after Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Comparison of Hem-o-lok and Endoloop for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Observational Retrospective Study. Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Full Endoscopic Lamina Fenestration Decompression in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Unilateral Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1