Identifying Clusters of Curatively-Treated Esophageal Cancer Patients Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at Three Months from Discharge: A Secondary Analysis from a Longitudinal Single Center Study.

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to identify meaningful clusters based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in curatively-treated esophageal cancer patients at three months post-discharge.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a longitudinal single-center study included 46 esophageal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery. Patients were selected based on their completion of PROMs surveys at three months post-discharge, were aged 18 years or older, and had undergone surgical resection (esophagectomy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The analysis utilized t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) for dimensionality reduction and hierarchical clustering to analyze PROMs data collected three months post-discharge. Clustering was performed on physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning variables, symptom burden, and health literacy.

Results: Three distinct clusters were identified: Cluster 1 (n = 24) with higher functioning and moderate symptoms, Cluster 2 (n = 14) with moderate functioning, higher symptoms, and lower health literacy, and Cluster 3 (n = 8) with the highest functioning, lowest symptoms, and highest health literacy. Significant differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma subtypes were observed across several PROMs domains, including critical health literacy, general health status/quality of life, nausea and vomiting, and insomnia. These clusters provide an exploratory framework for tailoring post-operative interventions to enhance patient recovery, which necessitates further confirmatory investigations, including outcomes such as complications and mortality, in the analysis.

Conclusions: This study fills a research gap by demonstrating the utility of PROMs in identifying distinct recovery patterns in esophageal cancer patients post-surgery. The findings support the use of PROMs to guide personalized post-operative care, potentially improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Further research is needed to validate these findings in larger, diverse populations.