Building the OAChangeMap to improve the service delivery of the New South Wales Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program: a worked example of using a co-design framework.
Jillian P Eyles, Sarah Kobayashi, Vicky Duong, David J Hunter, Christos Avdalis, Tom Buttel, Greer Dawson, Murillo Dório, Nicole D'Souza, Kirsty Foster, Katherine Maka, Marie K March, Fred Menz, Carin Pratt, Nicole M Rankin, Daniel Richardson, Julia Thompson, Charlotte Strong, Jocelyn L Bowden
{"title":"Building the OAChangeMap to improve the service delivery of the New South Wales Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program: a worked example of using a co-design framework.","authors":"Jillian P Eyles, Sarah Kobayashi, Vicky Duong, David J Hunter, Christos Avdalis, Tom Buttel, Greer Dawson, Murillo Dório, Nicole D'Souza, Kirsty Foster, Katherine Maka, Marie K March, Fred Menz, Carin Pratt, Nicole M Rankin, Daniel Richardson, Julia Thompson, Charlotte Strong, Jocelyn L Bowden","doi":"10.1002/acr.25454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP) has been implemented in Australian public hospitals to deliver best-evidence OA care. It is important to ensure that the OACCP continues to deliver evidence-based OA care as intended. We aimed to identify barriers and enablers to delivering the OACCP, prioritise the barriers, and generate strategies to address them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study provides a worked example of a seven-step theory-informed co-design framework. We invited OACCP coordinators to participate in semi-structured interviews (analysed thematically) and complete a questionnaire to identify barriers and enablers to delivery of the OACCP. We then invited a broader group of stakeholders (OACCP coordinators, health managers, policy makers, consumers, researchers) to prioritise the barriers via a short survey (survey 2). We held five co-design workshops where we mapped the priority barriers to the Theoretical Domains Framework and developed strategies to address them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen coordinators were interviewed and the main barriers identified were: 1. patients often have beliefs that are inconsistent with best-evidence care; 2. there are aspects of clinical care that are not delivered optimally; and 3. system level factors are a barrier to optimal patient care and sustainability of the OACCP. We co-designed a plan for action with patient educational materials, shared decision-making tools, and health professional education and training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our worked example of co-design used a theory-based, data driven approach with key stakeholders, identified and prioritised barriers to the delivery of the OACCP, acknowledged enablers, and generated a plan for feasible strategies to improve the program.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25454","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Program (OACCP) has been implemented in Australian public hospitals to deliver best-evidence OA care. It is important to ensure that the OACCP continues to deliver evidence-based OA care as intended. We aimed to identify barriers and enablers to delivering the OACCP, prioritise the barriers, and generate strategies to address them.
Methods: This study provides a worked example of a seven-step theory-informed co-design framework. We invited OACCP coordinators to participate in semi-structured interviews (analysed thematically) and complete a questionnaire to identify barriers and enablers to delivery of the OACCP. We then invited a broader group of stakeholders (OACCP coordinators, health managers, policy makers, consumers, researchers) to prioritise the barriers via a short survey (survey 2). We held five co-design workshops where we mapped the priority barriers to the Theoretical Domains Framework and developed strategies to address them.
Results: Sixteen coordinators were interviewed and the main barriers identified were: 1. patients often have beliefs that are inconsistent with best-evidence care; 2. there are aspects of clinical care that are not delivered optimally; and 3. system level factors are a barrier to optimal patient care and sustainability of the OACCP. We co-designed a plan for action with patient educational materials, shared decision-making tools, and health professional education and training.
Conclusion: Our worked example of co-design used a theory-based, data driven approach with key stakeholders, identified and prioritised barriers to the delivery of the OACCP, acknowledged enablers, and generated a plan for feasible strategies to improve the program.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.