High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after extubation: a noninferior randomized controlled trial protocol.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03342-w
Xinyuan Yang, Jiangli Cheng, Zhen Wang, Meiling Dong, Zhaomin Xu, He Yu, Guopeng Liang
{"title":"High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus noninvasive ventilation for elderly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients after extubation: a noninferior randomized controlled trial protocol.","authors":"Xinyuan Yang, Jiangli Cheng, Zhen Wang, Meiling Dong, Zhaomin Xu, He Yu, Guopeng Liang","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03342-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used for sequential extubation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, NIV may cause many adverse events such as claustrophobia, facial skin compression, air leakage, bloating, and even reflux aspiration, resulting in poor patient compliance/tolerance and high failure rate, especially for older adults who are at high risk of communication difficulties and consciousness disorder. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a new alternative support to NIV, but whether it can effectively reduce the rate of re-intubation after extubation in elderly patients with COPD remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of HFNC versus NIV for elderly COPD patients after extubation.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This study is an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, non-inferior, randomized controlled trial. Elderly patients (age > 65 years) who have received invasive ventilation and was diagnosed with COPD will be randomly assigned to HFNC group or NIV group immediately after extubation with a planned enrollment of 168 patients. The primary outcomes will be reintubation rates at 72 h and 7 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes will include treatment failure, post-extubation vital signs and arterial blood gases, the scores of compliance and comfort of patients, duration of respiratory support after extubation, respiratory support related adverse events, sleep quality scores, usage of sedative and analgesic drugs after extubation, and the incidence of delirium. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days post-randomization, tracheotomy rate, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality will be evaluated.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023-2284). Informed consent is required. It is expected that a follow-up randomized controlled trial will be conducted. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400087312).</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03342-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is widely used for sequential extubation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, NIV may cause many adverse events such as claustrophobia, facial skin compression, air leakage, bloating, and even reflux aspiration, resulting in poor patient compliance/tolerance and high failure rate, especially for older adults who are at high risk of communication difficulties and consciousness disorder. High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy is a new alternative support to NIV, but whether it can effectively reduce the rate of re-intubation after extubation in elderly patients with COPD remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of HFNC versus NIV for elderly COPD patients after extubation.

Methods and analysis: This study is an investigator-initiated, single-center, prospective, non-inferior, randomized controlled trial. Elderly patients (age > 65 years) who have received invasive ventilation and was diagnosed with COPD will be randomly assigned to HFNC group or NIV group immediately after extubation with a planned enrollment of 168 patients. The primary outcomes will be reintubation rates at 72 h and 7 days after extubation. Secondary outcomes will include treatment failure, post-extubation vital signs and arterial blood gases, the scores of compliance and comfort of patients, duration of respiratory support after extubation, respiratory support related adverse events, sleep quality scores, usage of sedative and analgesic drugs after extubation, and the incidence of delirium. Additionally, clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days at 28 days post-randomization, tracheotomy rate, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, ICU and hospital mortality will be evaluated.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (2023-2284). Informed consent is required. It is expected that a follow-up randomized controlled trial will be conducted. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR2400087312).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对拔管后的老年慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行高流量鼻插管氧疗与无创通气:非劣效随机对照试验方案。
简介:无创通气(NIV)被广泛用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的顺序拔管。然而,无创通气可能会引起许多不良反应,如幽闭恐惧症、面部皮肤受压、漏气、腹胀,甚至反流吸入等,导致患者依从性/耐受性差,失败率高,尤其是对于沟通困难和意识障碍风险较高的老年人。高流量鼻插管(HFNC)氧疗是 NIV 的一种新的替代支持方式,但它能否有效降低 COPD 老年患者拔管后的再插管率仍存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨 HFNC 与 NIV 相比对老年 COPD 患者拔管后的安全性和有效性:本研究是一项由研究者发起的单中心、前瞻性、非劣效、随机对照试验。接受过有创通气并被诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的老年患者(年龄大于 65 岁)将在拔管后立即被随机分配到 HFNC 组或 NIV 组,计划招募 168 名患者。主要结果是拔管后 72 小时和 7 天内的再插管率。次要结果将包括治疗失败、拔管后生命体征和动脉血气、患者依从性和舒适度评分、拔管后呼吸支持持续时间、呼吸支持相关不良事件、睡眠质量评分、拔管后镇静和镇痛药物使用情况以及谵妄发生率。此外,还将评估随机后 28 天无呼吸机天数、气管切开率、重症监护室(ICU)和住院时间、ICU 和住院死亡率等临床结果:本研究已获得四川大学华西医院伦理委员会批准(2023-2284)。需要知情同意。预计将进行后续随机对照试验。试验结果将在同行评审期刊上发表,并在一次或多次科学会议上展示:该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 进行了回顾性注册(ChiCTR2400087312)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Impact of vitamin D on hyperoxic acute lung injury in neonatal mice. Significance of respiratory virus coinfection in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. Proposal of a radiation-free screening protocol for early detection of interstitial lung involvement in seropositive and ACPA-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Electrical impedance tomography guided positive end-expiratory pressure titration in critically ill and surgical adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Predictive value of direct bilirubin and total bile acid in lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with EGFR-TKIs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1