A single session of coordinative motor training does not improve spatial ability performances in healthy children.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1411127
Christina Morawietz, Anna Maria Wissmann, Till Kuehne, Thomas Muehlbauer
{"title":"A single session of coordinative motor training does not improve spatial ability performances in healthy children.","authors":"Christina Morawietz, Anna Maria Wissmann, Till Kuehne, Thomas Muehlbauer","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1411127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, studies have found small-to-medium positive effects of physical activity on academic achievement. Already acute bouts of exercise appear to improve certain cognitive functions. Spatial abilities are one aspect of cognition that is encountered frequently in daily life and that is closely related to success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-subjects. However, little is known about the effects of an acute exercise session on spatial abilities. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of a single session of coordinative motor training (CMT) on spatial ability performances in healthy children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine children were assigned to either a single session of CMT (i.e., obstacle course with motor coordinative and spatial elements) (<i>n</i> = 25, 12 females, mean age: 10.7 ± 0.6 years) or a resting control group (<i>n</i> = 24, 12 females, mean age ± SD: 11.4 ± 0.5 years). Spatial abilities were evaluated in both groups using the Paper Folding Test (PFT), Mental Rotation Test (MRT), Water Level Task (WLT), Corsi Block Test (CBT), and Numbered Cones Run (NCR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistical main effect for Test was observed for the majority of outcomes (i.e., all but the MRT). Test × Group interactions did not reach the level of significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that a single session of CMT does not improve spatial ability performances of healthy children. Future research should evaluate whether repeated longer-term interventions might be more suitable to generate significant improvements in spatial abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11513305/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1411127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In recent years, studies have found small-to-medium positive effects of physical activity on academic achievement. Already acute bouts of exercise appear to improve certain cognitive functions. Spatial abilities are one aspect of cognition that is encountered frequently in daily life and that is closely related to success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-subjects. However, little is known about the effects of an acute exercise session on spatial abilities. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of a single session of coordinative motor training (CMT) on spatial ability performances in healthy children.

Methods: Forty-nine children were assigned to either a single session of CMT (i.e., obstacle course with motor coordinative and spatial elements) (n = 25, 12 females, mean age: 10.7 ± 0.6 years) or a resting control group (n = 24, 12 females, mean age ± SD: 11.4 ± 0.5 years). Spatial abilities were evaluated in both groups using the Paper Folding Test (PFT), Mental Rotation Test (MRT), Water Level Task (WLT), Corsi Block Test (CBT), and Numbered Cones Run (NCR).

Results: A statistical main effect for Test was observed for the majority of outcomes (i.e., all but the MRT). Test × Group interactions did not reach the level of significance.

Conclusion: The results indicate that a single session of CMT does not improve spatial ability performances of healthy children. Future research should evaluate whether repeated longer-term interventions might be more suitable to generate significant improvements in spatial abilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单次协调运动训练并不能提高健康儿童的空间能力表现。
背景:近年来的研究发现,体育锻炼对学习成绩有中小程度的积极影响。急性运动似乎就能改善某些认知功能。空间能力是日常生活中经常遇到的认知能力之一,与科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)科目的成功密切相关。然而,人们对急性运动对空间能力的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在评估单节协调运动训练(CMT)对健康儿童空间能力表现的影响:方法:49 名儿童被分配到单节协调运动训练(即包含运动协调和空间元素的障碍赛)组(25 人,12 名女性,平均年龄:10.7 ± 0.6 岁)或静止对照组(24 人,12 名女性,平均年龄 ± SD:11.4 ± 0.5 岁)。两组均使用折纸测试(PFT)、心理旋转测试(MRT)、水位任务(WLT)、柯西块测试(CBT)和编号锥体跑(NCR)对空间能力进行评估:在大多数结果(即除智力旋转测试外的所有结果)中,都观察到了测试的统计主效应。测试 × 组的交互作用未达到显著性水平:结果表明,单次 CMT 训练并不能提高健康儿童的空间能力表现。未来的研究应评估长期重复干预是否更适合显著提高空间能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inter-individual differences in muscle damage following a single bout of high-intense whole-body electromyostimulation. Habitual water intake impacted the body composition of young male athletes in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. The relationship between maximal lactate accumulation rate and sprint performance parameters in male competitive swimmers. Coach perspectives on coach-athlete relationships and characteristics of Generation Z academy level rugby union players from South Africa. Digital fist bumps: searching for datafication and digitalisation in everyday CrossFit coaching practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1