Deprescribing in hospitalized patients with cancer: A clinical pharmacist-initiated multidisciplinary intervention.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1177/10781552241294016
Razan Sakran, Michael Litvak, Nissim Haim, Daniel Kurnik
{"title":"Deprescribing in hospitalized patients with cancer: A clinical pharmacist-initiated multidisciplinary intervention.","authors":"Razan Sakran, Michael Litvak, Nissim Haim, Daniel Kurnik","doi":"10.1177/10781552241294016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the feasibility and utility of a clinical pharmacist-led multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention in hospitalized cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study among cancer patients hospitalized in oncology department who underwent a medication review by a clinical pharmacist. The pharmacist's recommendations were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic and clinical information, including information on medication burden before and after intervention and number and types of deprescribing recommendations and their acceptance, and compared them among patients with different estimated life expectancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a 2-year study period, 392 patients evaluated by the clinical pharmacist received 2808 prescriptions (median, 7 per patient). The clinical pharmacist recommended deprescribing of 559 medications (19.9%; 95 CI, 18.4-21.4%), at least 1 medication in 321 patients (82%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 89.6% of deprescribing recommendations, resulting in a reduction of the medication burden by 501 medications (<i>P</i> < 0.001). 12.8% of deprescriptions addressed clinically manifested adverse drug effects in 15.1% of patients. The estimation of life expectancy by the senior oncologist was reasonably accurate, but did not affect deprescribing rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A clinical pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention within a multidisciplinary team effectively reduces medication burden and addresses adverse drug effects in cancer patients. Deprescribing interventions should be incorporated in cancer patients at any stage of the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241294016"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241294016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the feasibility and utility of a clinical pharmacist-led multidisciplinary deprescribing intervention in hospitalized cancer patients.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study among cancer patients hospitalized in oncology department who underwent a medication review by a clinical pharmacist. The pharmacist's recommendations were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. We collected demographic and clinical information, including information on medication burden before and after intervention and number and types of deprescribing recommendations and their acceptance, and compared them among patients with different estimated life expectancies.

Results: During a 2-year study period, 392 patients evaluated by the clinical pharmacist received 2808 prescriptions (median, 7 per patient). The clinical pharmacist recommended deprescribing of 559 medications (19.9%; 95 CI, 18.4-21.4%), at least 1 medication in 321 patients (82%). The multidisciplinary team accepted 89.6% of deprescribing recommendations, resulting in a reduction of the medication burden by 501 medications (P < 0.001). 12.8% of deprescriptions addressed clinically manifested adverse drug effects in 15.1% of patients. The estimation of life expectancy by the senior oncologist was reasonably accurate, but did not affect deprescribing rate.

Conclusions: A clinical pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention within a multidisciplinary team effectively reduces medication burden and addresses adverse drug effects in cancer patients. Deprescribing interventions should be incorporated in cancer patients at any stage of the disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院癌症患者的去处方化:临床药剂师发起的多学科干预。
目的:研究以临床药师为主导的多学科处方干预对住院癌症患者的可行性和实用性:我们对在肿瘤科住院的癌症患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了临床药剂师的用药审查。药剂师的建议由一个多学科团队进行评估。我们收集了人口统计学和临床信息,包括干预前后的用药负担、停药建议的数量和类型及其接受程度,并对不同预期寿命的患者进行了比较:在为期两年的研究期间,接受临床药剂师评估的 392 名患者共收到 2808 份处方(中位数为每名患者 7 份)。临床药剂师建议停用 559 种药物(19.9%;95 CI,18.4-21.4%),其中 321 名患者(82%)至少停用 1 种药物。多学科团队接受了 89.6% 的减药建议,从而减少了 501 种药物的用药负担(P 结论:临床药师主导的减药治疗可减少患者的用药负担:在多学科团队中由临床药师主导的去处方干预措施可有效减轻癌症患者的用药负担,并解决药物不良反应问题。在癌症患者的任何疾病阶段都应采取减药干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic surface contamination in hospitals: Current practices, challenges and perspectives. Cytomegalovirus viremia and hepatitis B reactivation in patient with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with pralsetinib. Workflow evaluation of environmental contamination with hazardous drugs during compounding and administration in an UK hospital. An assessment of seven closed system transfer devices in accordance with the 2015 NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol. Hospital pharmacists' perceived competence in providing care to oncology patients - (HoPP-CoP2).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1