Post-Amputation Pain: Combined Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Opioids and Gabapentinoids versus Placebo.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S486220
Adam Arthur, Leonardo Kapural, Richard P Chiacchierini, Nicholas J Hargus, William R Patterson
{"title":"Post-Amputation Pain: Combined Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Opioids and Gabapentinoids versus Placebo.","authors":"Adam Arthur, Leonardo Kapural, Richard P Chiacchierini, Nicholas J Hargus, William R Patterson","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S486220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated 185,000 patients per year undergo an extremity amputation in the United States (over 500 amputations/day). Prolonged postoperative opioid use, defined as the presence of a filled opioid prescription between 90 and 180 days following the operative amputation procedure, affects nearly 50% of amputees. Moreover, the use of preoperative benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is strongly linked to prolonged opioid use suggesting new therapeutic strategies are needed. The goal of this study was to better understand how well post-amputation pain is currently treated by selected pharmacologic agents and the success rates of these existing agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The available literature on PubMed was screened for articles that used randomized-controlled trial (RCT) study designs and gabapentinoids (eg, gabapentin or pregabalin) or opioids (eg, morphine). Two morphine-related RCTs using at least 50% pain reduction responder criteria were combined and qualitatively compared with two gabapentin trials that were previously combined to understand the potential benefits of these drugs in post-amputation pain management compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 4 trials included measured post-amputation pain over a 4- to 6-week acute period. The combined opioid analysis demonstrated a treatment effect that favored morphine (<i>P</i>=0.02) over placebo and indicated the number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.9 (95% CI: 2.5, 9.3) patients. Similarly, the previously combined analysis of gabapentin trials favored gabapentin over placebo and indicated an estimated NNT of 8.9 (95% CI: 5.3, 27.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients undergoing limb amputation have a clear unmet need for more adequate chronic pain control. Given that post-amputation pain is often diagnosed as a chronic condition, persisting for at least 90 days, our data highlight the need for larger sample sizes and longer-term controlled trials to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of chronic use of gabapentinoids and opioids/opioid combination drugs in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"3449-3453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11514656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S486220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An estimated 185,000 patients per year undergo an extremity amputation in the United States (over 500 amputations/day). Prolonged postoperative opioid use, defined as the presence of a filled opioid prescription between 90 and 180 days following the operative amputation procedure, affects nearly 50% of amputees. Moreover, the use of preoperative benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, and antidepressants is strongly linked to prolonged opioid use suggesting new therapeutic strategies are needed. The goal of this study was to better understand how well post-amputation pain is currently treated by selected pharmacologic agents and the success rates of these existing agents.

Methods: The available literature on PubMed was screened for articles that used randomized-controlled trial (RCT) study designs and gabapentinoids (eg, gabapentin or pregabalin) or opioids (eg, morphine). Two morphine-related RCTs using at least 50% pain reduction responder criteria were combined and qualitatively compared with two gabapentin trials that were previously combined to understand the potential benefits of these drugs in post-amputation pain management compared with placebo.

Results: All 4 trials included measured post-amputation pain over a 4- to 6-week acute period. The combined opioid analysis demonstrated a treatment effect that favored morphine (P=0.02) over placebo and indicated the number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.9 (95% CI: 2.5, 9.3) patients. Similarly, the previously combined analysis of gabapentin trials favored gabapentin over placebo and indicated an estimated NNT of 8.9 (95% CI: 5.3, 27.8).

Conclusion: Patients undergoing limb amputation have a clear unmet need for more adequate chronic pain control. Given that post-amputation pain is often diagnosed as a chronic condition, persisting for at least 90 days, our data highlight the need for larger sample sizes and longer-term controlled trials to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of chronic use of gabapentinoids and opioids/opioid combination drugs in this patient population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
截肢后疼痛:评估阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物与安慰剂的随机对照试验的综合分析。
背景:据估计,美国每年有 18.5 万名患者接受四肢截肢手术(每天超过 500 例)。术后长期使用阿片类药物(定义为在截肢手术后 90 到 180 天内有阿片类药物处方)影响了近 50% 的截肢者。此外,术前使用苯二氮卓类药物、肌肉松弛剂、抗惊厥药和抗抑郁药与阿片类药物的长期使用密切相关,这表明需要新的治疗策略。本研究的目的是更好地了解目前使用特定药物治疗截肢后疼痛的效果以及这些现有药物的成功率:对 PubMed 上的现有文献进行了筛选,以查找采用随机对照试验 (RCT) 研究设计和加巴喷丁(如加巴喷丁或普瑞巴林)或阿片类药物(如吗啡)的文章。两项与吗啡相关的 RCT 采用了至少 50% 的疼痛减轻应答标准,我们将其与之前合并的两项加巴喷丁试验进行了合并和定性比较,以了解与安慰剂相比,这些药物在截肢后疼痛治疗中的潜在益处:所有 4 项试验都对截肢后 4 至 6 周的急性期疼痛进行了测量。阿片类药物的合并分析表明,吗啡(P=0.02)的治疗效果优于安慰剂,治疗所需人数(NNT)为3.9(95% CI:2.5,9.3)人。同样,之前对加巴喷丁试验的合并分析显示,加巴喷丁优于安慰剂,估计NNT为8.9(95% CI:5.3,27.8):结论:截肢患者对更充分的慢性疼痛控制的需求显然尚未得到满足。鉴于截肢后疼痛通常被诊断为慢性病,至少会持续 90 天,我们的数据突出表明需要更大的样本量和更长期的对照试验,以更好地了解在这一患者群体中长期使用加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物/阿片类药物复方制剂的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
期刊最新文献
Comment on 'Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment of the Clinical Efficacy of the Combination of Acupressure and "Three Methods of Neck Movement (TCM)" Therapy in the Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial' [Response to Letter]. Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Extra-Prevertebral Fascial Suprascapular Nerve and Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Phrenic Nerve Function in Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Pilot Study. Predictive Scores for Identifying Chronic Opioid Dependence After General Anesthesia Surgery. Functional Brain Changes in Younger Population of Cervical Spondylosis Patients with Chronic Neck Pain. A Data Mining Study for Analysis of Acupoint Selection and Combinations in Acupuncture Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome [Response to Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1